Dear Wolfgang,
In message 49703e5b.1080...@grandegger.com you wrote:
Yep, in the meantime I realized that it's already pre-set in
include/linux/mtd/nand.h:
/* The maximum number of NAND chips in an array */
#ifndef NAND_MAX_CHIPS
#define NAND_MAX_CHIPS 8
#endif
but
Dear Stefan Roese,
In message 200901141139.37554...@denx.de you wrote:
The following changes since commit 5f01ea63a6c263767f548b4f61880b08f7850ffc:
Wolfgang Denk (1):
Merge branch 'master' of /home/wd/git/u-boot/custodians
are available in the git repository at:
Dear Nobuhiro Iwamatsu,
In message 29ab51dc0901151903x519540bdnd8bdf9b0c8d50...@mail.gmail.com you
wrote:
Please pull u-boot-sh master branch.
Best regards,
Nobuhiro
The following changes since commit 0e3ece33801e377be67ffa29f083421ad820f28b:
Wolfgang Denk (1):
Dear Mike Frysinger,
In message 1231493897-7012-1-git-send-email-vap...@gentoo.org you wrote:
The recvfrom() function takes a socklen_t, not an int.
Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org
---
tools/ncb.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
Applied,
Dear Mike Frysinger,
In message 1231493902-7043-1-git-send-email-vap...@gentoo.org you wrote:
The netcat utility likes to exit when it receives an empty packet (as it
thinks this means EOF). This can easily occur when working with command
line editing as this behavior will be triggered when
Dear Jeff,
In message cd5706fd9959bf44a988c3ff7279b4f1010fa...@hercules.sandel.local you
wrote:
1.Does anyone have a patch for the mpc5121e for NAND booting where
there is no NOR flash in the system?
Not yet. I think Freescale / STX are working on this.
2.Are there any patches
Dear all,
Could anyone kindly tell me if u-boot supports itself as a mass storage
device?
Or if u-boot main stream support the a protocol so call USB
DFU(Universal Serial Bus Device Firmware Upgrade)?
I have first seen this on openmoko.org and seems they use u-boot as
well. However, when I look
Dear all,
Could anyone kindly tell me if u-boot supports itself as a mass storage
device?
Or if u-boot main stream support the a protocol so call USB
DFU(Universal Serial Bus Device Firmware Upgrade)?
I have first seen this on openmoko.org and seems they use u-boot as
well. However, when I look
Dear all,
Could anyone kindly tell me if u-boot supports itself as a mass storage
device?
Or if u-boot main stream support the a protocol so call USB
DFU(Universal Serial Bus Device Firmware Upgrade)?
I have first seen this on openmoko.org and seems they use u-boot as
well. However, when I look
Dear Jacky Lam,
In message 39811fe10901160153s2c9e1f63s70481667fe792...@mail.gmail.com you
wrote:
Could anyone kindly tell me if u-boot supports itself as a mass storage
device?
No, it does not. A lot of infrastructure for that is missing, for
example writable file systems to name just one.
On 17:59 Fri 16 Jan , Jacky Lam wrote:
Dear all,
Could anyone kindly tell me if u-boot supports itself as a mass storage
device?
no, maybe MTP will be simplest to implement
Or if u-boot main stream support the a protocol so call USB
DFU(Universal Serial Bus Device Firmware Upgrade)?
L. A. Linden Levy wrote:
Can someone tell me how to use the mii command? I have the following
from a dump:
uBOOT= mii dump
MII not complete
0. () -- PHY control register --
(8000:8000) 0.15= 1reset
(4000:4000) 0.14= 1loopback
(2040:2040)
I'm guessing that 1.2.0 was a BSP u-boot, that was not upstream. I don't
think upstream 1.2.0 had UPM NAND support.
You are right, there were no UPM support on U-boot-1.2.0.
I used patches sended by Anton from here:
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 07:53:29PM +0100, Remy Bohmer wrote:
Hello,
Hi,
2009/1/14 Paal Bakken pabak...@online.no:
I have problems with usb mass storage in u-boot.
We have our own at91sam9263 board, but I experience exactly the same
problems on the standard at91sam9263ek. And the
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Wolfgang,
In message 49703e5b.1080...@grandegger.com you wrote:
Yep, in the meantime I realized that it's already pre-set in
include/linux/mtd/nand.h:
/* The maximum number of NAND chips in an array */
#ifndef NAND_MAX_CHIPS
#define NAND_MAX_CHIPS
This patch renames NAND_MAX_CHIPS to CONFIG_SYS_NAND_MAX_CHIPS and
changes the default from 8 to 1 for the legacy and the new MTD
NAND layer. This allows to remove all NAND_MAX_CHIPS definitions
in the board config files because none of the boards use multi
chip support (NAND_MAX_CHIPS 1) so far.
On Friday 16 January 2009 03:37:40 Wolfgang Denk wrote:
In message 1231493902-7043-1-git-send-email-vap...@gentoo.org you wrote:
The netcat utility likes to exit when it receives an empty packet (as it
thinks this means EOF). This can easily occur when working with command
line editing as
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 06:55:54PM +0100, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
This patch renames NAND_MAX_CHIPS to CONFIG_SYS_NAND_MAX_CHIPS and
changes the default from 8 to 1 for the legacy and the new MTD
NAND layer. This allows to remove all NAND_MAX_CHIPS definitions
in the board config files
Dear sir,
My new kernel refuses to boot up complaining about invalid machine id.
(providing that my old kernel (2.6.16) works fine, while new ones (2.6.27 or
2.6.28) refuse to boot up.
I have tried looking up and bdinfo shows the correct information (
0x0106) but it reads r1 as (r1 =
Hello,
I'm hacking U-Boot to a new at91sam9261 board and would like to include
a little bit low level init code (pll, sdram, etc.).
Normally, in U-Boot it is assumed that on at91 plattforms the bootstrap
code lives in dataflash which do the job.
On the board I'm hacking there isn't any
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 02:02:26PM -0200, Alemao wrote:
I'm guessing that 1.2.0 was a BSP u-boot, that was not upstream. I don't
think upstream 1.2.0 had UPM NAND support.
You are right, there were no UPM support on U-boot-1.2.0.
I used patches sended by Anton from here:
Ping? This should go into the v2009.01 release.
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD plagn...@jcrosoft.com
---
.../README.nios_CONFIG_SYS_NIOS_CPU|0
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
rename
22 matches
Mail list logo
