Hi Simon,
Great work on the SPL patches for omap. I am getting a bit familiar
with this and earlier SPL work.
Just one question about one of your patches I happen to notice [1],
why is there a SPL build for each different boot mode such as for
NAND, MMC etc?. Wouldn't it be nicer to have a
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 1:11 AM, Joel A Fernandes agnel.j...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Simon,
Great work on the SPL patches for omap. I am getting a bit familiar
with this and earlier SPL work.
Just one question about one of your patches I happen to notice [1],
Sorry, I was referring to this
On 09/16/2011 01:13 AM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
Hi Stefano,
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 5:21 PM, stefano babic sba...@denx.de wrote:
..
Does anyone have smc911x working with the latest U-boot?
I have now tested on a mx35pdk with Debug board. It has a SMC911x. It works:
Thanks for testing! I
On Sep 15, 2011, at 8:54 AM, Jason Cooper wrote:
Signed-off-by: Jason Cooper u-b...@lakedaemon.net
---
common/fdt_decode.c | 14 --
include/fdt_decode.h | 32
2 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
Did I miss where these files
-Original Message-
From: u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de [mailto:u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de] On
Behalf Of Stany MARCEL
Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2011 8:44 PM
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Cc: Jin Zhengxiong-R64188; Stany MARCEL; Jin Zhengxiong-R64188
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/6]
-Original Message-
From: Stany MARCEL [mailto:stany.mar...@novasys-ingenierie.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2011 8:44 PM
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Cc: Jin Zhengxiong-R64188; Jin Zhengxiong-R64188; Stany MARCEL
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] ColdFire: Cleanup lds files for multiple defined
On 09/16/2011 01:18 AM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
Hi Fabio,
When booting a mainline kernel on a mx31pdk the system gets getting resets
from the watchdog.
As the kernel has watchdog support, disable it from U-boot.
But if the kernel has support for watchdog, why does the system reset ?
I
Dear all,
This patch series adds support for Samsung's USB Device Controller
(UDC) on GONI reference target.
---
Depend on:
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/112847/
Lukasz Majewski (2):
usb:gadget:s5p USB Device Controller (UDC) implementation
usb:gadget:s5p Enabling the USB
Hi Joel,
The current release (based on u-boot-ti) is V9:
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/bundle/Simon/OMAP3_SPL_V9/
Or V10
http://mid.gmane.org/1315949258-12064-1-git-send-email-tr...@ti.com
(based on u-boot-arm)
Actually this may already work (although I haven't tested it yet). If
you define
Dear Angus Ainslie
On 13 September 2011 05:11, Angus Ainslie angus.ains...@linaro.org wrote:
On some hosts using relative paths will cause the build to fail. This
patch sets absolute paths for the tools directory
Get rid of MSDOS style excecutable extension
Signed-off-by: Angus Ainslie
Dear Angus Ainslie,
On 12 September 2011 16:04, Chander Kashyap chander.kash...@linaro.org wrote:
Dear Angus,
On 10 September 2011 03:32, angus.ains...@linaro.org wrote:
From: Angus Ainslie angus.ains...@linaro.org
Enable passing a flattened device tree to the kernel.
Signed-off-by:
Hello everyone,
this is my first attempt to use u-boot
on an sbc2410x board with s3c2410a arm processor (v. arm4t)
I have surfed the git repository and realised that the specific board has
been removed from the u-boot-arm branch.
commit message was : ARM: remove broken sbc2410x board
so I picked
The structure and PLL defines are added to
the imx-regs.h file and dropped from board
header files.
Signed-off-by: Stefano Babic sba...@denx.de
---
arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx35/imx-regs.h | 30 +
board/freescale/mx35pdk/mx35pdk.h | 18 -
Signed-off-by: Stefano Babic sba...@denx.de
---
arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx35/mx35_pins.h |3 +++
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx35/mx35_pins.h
b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx35/mx35_pins.h
index 14669ff..3676e33 100644
---
Signed-off-by: Stefano Babic sba...@denx.de
---
arch/arm/cpu/arm1136/mx35/generic.c | 31 +--
1 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/arm1136/mx35/generic.c
b/arch/arm/cpu/arm1136/mx35/generic.c
index fcfaba5..951bccb 100644
---
Functions inside armv7/syslib can be used by other ARM
architectures, too. The file is added as part of
ARM library.
Signed-off-by: Stefano Babic sba...@denx.de
CC: Albert ARIBAUD albert.u.b...@aribaud.net
---
arch/arm/cpu/armv7/Makefile |2 -
arch/arm/cpu/armv7/syslib.c | 69
Signed-off-by: Stefano Babic sba...@denx.de
CC: Heiko Schocher h...@denx.de
---
drivers/i2c/mxc_i2c.c |4
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/mxc_i2c.c b/drivers/i2c/mxc_i2c.c
index ebde3c5..25c33eb 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/mxc_i2c.c
+++
Signed-off-by: Stefano Babic sba...@denx.de
---
arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx35/lowlevel_macro.S | 140 +++
1 files changed, 140 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx35/lowlevel_macro.S
diff --git
The flea3 board is a custom board used in automotive.
Network (FEC), NOR, NAND and SPI are supported.
Signed-off-by: Stefano Babic sba...@denx.de
---
board/flea3/Makefile| 49
board/flea3/flea3.c | 254 +++
Signed-off-by: Stefano Babic sba...@denx.de
---
arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx35/imx-regs.h |4
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx35/imx-regs.h
b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx35/imx-regs.h
index 08fd2d5..038f0b6 100644
---
Each image handler must return a not-zero velue if the
header is not recognized to allow the main program to
iterate to the next handler.
Signed-off-by: Stefano Babic sba...@denx.de
CC: Heiko Schocher h...@denx.de
---
tools/ublimage.c |5 +
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0
Some Davinci processors supports the Application
Image Script (AIS) boot process. The patch adds the generation
of the AIS image inside the mkimage tool to make possible
to generate a bootable U-boot without external tools
(TI Davinci AIS Generator).
Signed-off-by: Stefano Babic sba...@denx.de
Hello Stefano,
Stefano Babic wrote:
Each image handler must return a not-zero velue if the
^
value
header is not recognized to allow the main program to
iterate to the next handler.
Signed-off-by:
i wannted wyslac u moje zdjecie dawno temu, ale balem sie, ze u dont like do
mnie. sprawdzic na linki u zobaczyc moje zdjecie, mam nadzieje, ze u like it
Pobierz i zobaczyc moje zdjecie ...
http://dropfile.ru/files/get/w0VuEegoD6/dc595963.zip
___
Flush the dcache before removing the TLB with caches enabled.
Otherwise this might lead to problems later on, e.g. while booting
Linux (as seen on ICON-440SPe).
Signed-off-by: Stefan Roese s...@denx.de
---
arch/powerpc/cpu/ppc4xx/44x_spd_ddr2.c |7 +++
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 0
Hello.
On 16-09-2011 3:18, Fabio Estevam wrote:
When booting a mainline kernel on a mx31pdk the system gets getting resets
from the watchdog.
That's tautological. Maybe is getting reset?
As the kernel has watchdog support, disable it from U-boot.
Signed-off-by: Fabio
On 09/16/2011 01:18 AM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
Change the prompt as done in other i.MX boards.
Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam fabio.este...@freescale.com
---
include/configs/mx31pdk.h |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/configs/mx31pdk.h
Hi Stefano,
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 6:46 AM, Stefano Babic sba...@denx.de wrote:
..
+void board_setup_sdram(void)
+{
+ u32 val;
+ struct esdc_regs *esdc = (struct esdc_regs *)ESDCTL_BASE_ADDR;
+
+ /* Initialize with default values both CSD0/1 */
+ writel(0x2000,
Hi Stefano,
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 6:46 AM, Stefano Babic sba...@denx.de wrote:
The flea3 board is a custom board used in automotive.
Network (FEC), NOR, NAND and SPI are supported.
Signed-off-by: Stefano Babic sba...@denx.de
---
board/flea3/Makefile | 49
On 09/16/2011 01:49 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
Hi Stefano,
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 6:46 AM, Stefano Babic sba...@denx.de wrote:
The flea3 board is a custom board used in automotive.
Network (FEC), NOR, NAND and SPI are supported.
Signed-off-by: Stefano Babic sba...@denx.de
---
Hi All,
Well, here we are again, a Timer API discussion :)
All things considered, I don't think the Linux approach is right for U-Boot
- It is designed to cater for way more use-cases than U-Boot will ever need
to deal with (time queues and call-backs in particular)
To summarise, in a nutshell,
On 09/16/2011 01:48 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
Hi Stefano,
Hi Fabio,
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 6:46 AM, Stefano Babic sba...@denx.de wrote:
..
+void board_setup_sdram(void)
+{
+ u32 val;
+ struct esdc_regs *esdc = (struct esdc_regs *)ESDCTL_BASE_ADDR;
+
+ /* Initialize
Kumar,
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 02:31:32AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
On Sep 15, 2011, at 8:54 AM, Jason Cooper wrote:
Signed-off-by: Jason Cooper u-b...@lakedaemon.net
---
common/fdt_decode.c | 14 --
include/fdt_decode.h | 32
2 files
Dear Joel A Fernandes,
In message CAD=gypaauvqo3s_8foufdlnayuys5cfs-fkl5guv3onng_z...@mail.gmail.com
you wrote:
Just one question about one of your patches I happen to notice [1],
why is there a SPL build for each different boot mode such as for
NAND, MMC etc?. Wouldn't it be nicer to have
Dear Athanasios Silis,
In message CADgchnu2_UASD66sCcOK3cm3teC=qtj8p2drm7mcapdqf0j...@mail.gmail.com
you wrote:
I have surfed the git repository and realised that the specific board has
been removed from the u-boot-arm branch.
commit message was : ARM: remove broken sbc2410x board
Please
On 09/16/2011 02:31 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Joel A Fernandes,
In
messageCAD=gypaauvqo3s_8foufdlnayuys5cfs-fkl5guv3onng_z...@mail.gmail.com
you wrote:
Just one question about one of your patches I happen to notice [1],
why is there a SPL build for each different boot mode such as
Currently the reset cause is printed like:
CPU: Freescale i.MX31 rev 2.0 at 531 MHz.Reset cause: POR
Improve readability by adding a new line like it is done on other i.MX boards.
Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam fabio.este...@freescale.com
---
arch/arm/cpu/arm1136/mx31/generic.c |2 +-
1
On Aug 26, 2011, at 1:32 PM, York Sun wrote:
Check second DIMM slot in case the first one is empty.
Honor DQS enable option for SDRAM mode register.
Signed-off-by: York Sun york...@freescale.com
---
arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc8xxx/ddr/ctrl_regs.c | 19 ++-
On Aug 26, 2011, at 1:32 PM, York Sun wrote:
The two slots on the same controller have different addresses.
Signed-off-by: York Sun york...@freescale.com
---
arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc8xxx/ddr/main.c | 11 +++
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
applied to 85xx 'next'
-
On Aug 26, 2011, at 1:32 PM, York Sun wrote:
Reduce the calculation error to 1ps.
Signed-off-by: York Sun york...@freescale.com
---
arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc8xxx/ddr/util.c | 26 +++---
1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
applied to 85xx 'next'
- k
On Aug 26, 2011, at 1:32 PM, York Sun wrote:
DDR2 has different ODT table and values. Adding table according to Samsung
application note.
Fix additive latency calculation to avoid interger underflow.
Signed-off-by: York Sun york...@freescale.com
---
MDSTAT.STATE occupies bits 0..5 according to all available documentation, so fix
the masks which previously was leaving out the itermediate state indicator bit.
Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov sshtyl...@ru.mvista.com
---
Analogous Linux patch has been queued in the linux-davinci tree:
On Aug 26, 2011, at 1:32 PM, York Sun wrote:
Update MPC8349EMDS to use unified DDR driver instead of spd_sdram.c.
The unified driver can initialize data using DDR controller. No need to
use DMA if just to initialze for ECC.
Signed-off-by: York Sun york...@freescale.com
Signed-off-by: Kim
On Aug 30, 2011, at 6:04 PM, Kumar Gala wrote:
The P2041RDB has almost identical setup for TLB, LAWS, and PCI with
other P-Series CoreNet platforms.
The only difference between P2041RDB P3041DS/P4080DS/P5020DS is the
CPLD vs PIXIS FPGA which we can handle via some simple #ifdefs in the
On Aug 30, 2011, at 6:04 PM, Kumar Gala wrote:
We shouldn't be setting execute permissions on TLB entries that will not
actually have any code run from them.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala ga...@kernel.crashing.org
---
board/freescale/p2041rdb/tlb.c | 34 +++---
1
On Aug 26, 2011, at 1:32 PM, York Sun wrote:
Unified DDR driver is maintained for better performance, robustness and bug
fixes. Upgrading to use unified DDR driver for MPC83xx takes advantage of
overall improvement. It requires changes for board files to customize
platform-dependent
On Aug 30, 2011, at 6:04 PM, Kumar Gala wrote:
We currently support 4 SoC/Boards from the P-Series of QorIQ SoCs that
are based on the 'CoreNet' Architecture: P2041RDB, P3041DS, P4080DS, and
P5020DS. There is a significant amount of commonality shared between
these boards that we can
MDSTAT.STATE occupies bits 0..5 according to all available documentation, so fix
the masks which previously was leaving out the intermediate state indicator bit.
Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov sshtyl...@ru.mvista.com
---
Resending with the corrected subject/description...
Analogous Linux patch
Add support for Job Queue/Ring LIODN for the RAID Engine on P5020. Each
Job Queue/Ring combo needs one id assigned for a total of 4 (2 JQs/2
Rings per JQ). This just handles RAID Engine in non-DPAA mode.
Signed-off-by: Santosh Shukla santosh.shu...@freescale.com
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala
On Aug 26, 2011, at 1:32 PM, York Sun wrote:
Interactive DDR debugging provides a user interface to view and modify SPD,
DIMM parameters, board options and DDR controller registers before DDR is
initialized. With this feature, developers can fine-tune DDR for board
bringup and other
I already have configured and built and have running u-boot and booting
Linux on my custom MPC8313 based board, all ok so far.
I am now trying to enable the altbootcmd and failbootcmd features so in
the event of a image failure or non linux boot I can reboot to a known
working image set.
I
save_boot_params in start.S got called for all armv7 based cpus. Since the
function relys on the OMAP specific bootloader this broke some boards
(or to be specific added more errors to already broken ones). This patch
wraps the call in #ifdef CONFIG_OMAP.
Signed-off-by: Simon Schwarz
Hi Simon,
On Friday 16 September 2011 09:02 PM, Simon Schwarz wrote:
save_boot_params in start.S got called for all armv7 based cpus. Since the
function relys on the OMAP specific bootloader this broke some boards
(or to be specific added more errors to already broken ones). This patch
wraps
On 09/15/2011 06:02 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
On Friday, September 16, 2011 12:54:26 AM Scott Wood wrote:
How about:
ifdef CONFIG_SPL_START_FILE
START := $(subst ,,$(CONFIG_SPL_START_FILE))
else
START := $(CPUDIR)/start.o
endif
START_PATH := $(dir $(START))
LIBS-y +=
On Friday, September 16, 2011 06:16:15 PM Scott Wood wrote:
On 09/15/2011 06:02 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
On Friday, September 16, 2011 12:54:26 AM Scott Wood wrote:
How about:
ifdef CONFIG_SPL_START_FILE
START := $(subst ,,$(CONFIG_SPL_START_FILE))
else
START := $(CPUDIR)/start.o
From: Sandeep Paulraj s-paul...@ti.com
Found a build erros when i ran MAKEALL.
So fix it.
Signed-off-by: Sandeep Paulraj s-paul...@ti.com
---
arch/arm/include/asm/omap_common.h |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/omap_common.h
This series contains a smaller version of the fastboot gadget. I removed
the flash/mmc/write to media part and re-add once I'm through with this
basic thing :)
This basic gadget supports the retrieval of variables (like serial
number), reboot functionality, download of binary data and booting them
This patch adds support for the Android boot-image format. The header
file is from the Android project and got slightly alterted so the struct +
its defines are not generic but have something like a namespace. The
header file is from bootloader/legacy/include/boot/bootimg.h. The header
parsing has
This is just an example how the board specific implementation can look
like. Not for merging.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior bige...@linutronix.de
---
board/ti/sdp4430/Makefile |7 ---
board/ti/sdp4430/fastboot.c | 36
2 files changed,
This patch contains an implementation of the fastboot protocol on the
device side and a little of documentation.
The gadget expects the new-style gadget framework.
The gadget implements the getvar, reboot, download and reboot commands.
What is missing is the flash handling i.e. writting the image
Le 16/09/2011 01:18, Jason a écrit :
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 07:10:49PM -0400, Jason wrote:
Albert,
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 11:42:12PM +0200, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
(re-posting cleaned up and outside any other discussion)
This RFC is for discussing how cache operation functions should be
On Friday, September 16, 2011 12:51:17 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
+#ifdef CONFIG_ANDROID_BOOT_IMAGE
we already have a standard here: CONFIG_BOOTM_ANDROID
+static u32 andoir_img_get_kload(struct andr_img_hdr *hdr)
looks like you missed a d in that andoir
-mike
signature.asc
On 09/16/2011 08:22 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Friday, September 16, 2011 12:51:17 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
+#ifdef CONFIG_ANDROID_BOOT_IMAGE
we already have a standard here: CONFIG_BOOTM_ANDROID
Ehm. Can't follow. If you want me to s/CONFIG_ANDROID_BOOT_IMAGE
/CONFIG_BOOTM_ANDROID/
York Sun wrote:
+Interactive DDR debugging
+===
+
+For DDR parameter tuning up and debugging, the interactive DDR debugging can
+be activated by saving an environment variable ddr_interactive. The value
+doesn't matter. Once activated, U-boot prompts FSL DDR before
On 09/08/2011 03:42 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut marek.va...@gmail.com
Cc: Stefano Babic sba...@denx.de
Cc: Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de
Cc: Detlev Zundel d...@denx.de
---
include/configs/m28evk.h | 11 +--
1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
On Fri, 2011-09-16 at 14:15 -0500, Timur Tabi wrote:
York Sun wrote:
+Interactive DDR debugging
+===
+
+For DDR parameter tuning up and debugging, the interactive DDR debugging
can
+be activated by saving an environment variable ddr_interactive. The value
York Sun wrote:
I think the interactive command is self-explained.
Why do people say things like that? If I say that it needs to be better
documented, then obviously it isn't self-explanatory.
I can add some
examples if needed. But I am afraid the example will be either too short
or too
On 09/15/2011 06:17 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
On Friday, September 16, 2011 12:57:44 AM Scott Wood wrote:
On 09/11/2011 11:03 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
Introduce CONFIG_SPL_NO_CPU_SUPPORT_CODE to avoid compiling the CPU
support library. This can be useful on some setups.
Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut
-Original Message-
From: u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de [mailto:u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de] On
Behalf Of Stany MARCEL
Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2011 8:44 PM
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Cc: Jin Zhengxiong-R64188; Stany MARCEL; Jin Zhengxiong-R64188
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/6]
-Original Message-
From: Stany MARCEL [mailto:stany.mar...@novasys-ingenierie.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2011 8:44 PM
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Cc: Jin Zhengxiong-R64188; Jin Zhengxiong-R64188; Stany MARCEL
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] ColdFire: Cleanup lds files for multiple defined
Dear Sergei Shtylyov,
In message 201109161858.08706.sshtyl...@ru.mvista.com you wrote:
MDSTAT.STATE occupies bits 0..5 according to all available documentation, so
fix
the masks which previously was leaving out the intermediate state indicator
bit.
Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov
Dear Sebastian Andrzej Siewior,
In message 1316191879-27214-2-git-send-email-bige...@linutronix.de you wrote:
This patch adds support for the Android boot-image format. The header
file is from the Android project and got slightly alterted so the struct +
its defines are not generic but have
Dear Sebastian Andrzej Siewior,
In message 1316191879-27214-3-git-send-email-bige...@linutronix.de you wrote:
This patch contains an implementation of the fastboot protocol on the
device side and a little of documentation.
The gadget expects the new-style gadget framework.
The gadget
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 1:14 AM, Simon Schwarz
simonschwarz...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi Joel,
The current release (based on u-boot-ti) is V9:
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/bundle/Simon/OMAP3_SPL_V9/
Or V10
http://mid.gmane.org/1315949258-12064-1-git-send-email-tr...@ti.com
(based on
Dear Sebastian Andrzej Siewior,
In message 1316191879-27214-4-git-send-email-bige...@linutronix.de you wrote:
This is just an example how the board specific implementation can look
like. Not for merging.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior bige...@linutronix.de
...
--- /dev/null
+++
On 09/16/2011 11:03 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Sebastian Andrzej Siewior,
Hi Wolfgang,
+ * Copyright (C) 2008 The Android Open Source Project
+ * All rights reserved.
+ *
+ * Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
+ * modification, are permitted provided that
On Friday, September 16, 2011 17:28:08 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
On 09/16/2011 11:03 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Sebastian Andrzej Siewior,
+ * Copyright (C) 2008 The Android Open Source Project
+ * All rights reserved.
+ *
+ * Redistribution and use in source and binary forms,
On Friday, September 16, 2011 09:49:28 PM Scott Wood wrote:
On 09/15/2011 06:17 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
On Friday, September 16, 2011 12:57:44 AM Scott Wood wrote:
On 09/11/2011 11:03 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
Introduce CONFIG_SPL_NO_CPU_SUPPORT_CODE to avoid compiling the CPU
support
On 09/16/2011 04:38 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
On Friday, September 16, 2011 09:49:28 PM Scott Wood wrote:
Still, this seems hackish. Shouldn't the control be on specific files
that you include, not directories?
I don't think so ... why ?
That's how the main U-Boot build does it... More
On Friday, September 16, 2011 11:42:50 PM Scott Wood wrote:
On 09/16/2011 04:38 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
On Friday, September 16, 2011 09:49:28 PM Scott Wood wrote:
Still, this seems hackish. Shouldn't the control be on specific files
that you include, not directories?
I don't think so
On 09/16/2011 11:35 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Friday, September 16, 2011 17:28:08 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
On 09/16/2011 11:03 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Sebastian Andrzej Siewior,
+ * Copyright (C) 2008 The Android Open Source Project
+ * All rights reserved.
+ *
+ *
On 09/16/2011 04:47 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
On Friday, September 16, 2011 11:42:50 PM Scott Wood wrote:
On 09/16/2011 04:38 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
On Friday, September 16, 2011 09:49:28 PM Scott Wood wrote:
Still, this seems hackish. Shouldn't the control be on specific files
that you
On Saturday, September 17, 2011 12:07:52 AM Scott Wood wrote:
On 09/16/2011 04:47 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
On Friday, September 16, 2011 11:42:50 PM Scott Wood wrote:
On 09/16/2011 04:38 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
On Friday, September 16, 2011 09:49:28 PM Scott Wood wrote:
Still, this seems
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 9:42 AM, s-paul...@ti.com wrote:
From: Sandeep Paulraj s-paul...@ti.com
Found a build erros when i ran MAKEALL.
So fix it.
Signed-off-by: Sandeep Paulraj s-paul...@ti.com
---
arch/arm/include/asm/omap_common.h | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 7:31 AM, Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote:
Dear Joel A Fernandes,
In message
CAD=gypaauvqo3s_8foufdlnayuys5cfs-fkl5guv3onng_z...@mail.gmail.com you
wrote:
Just one question about one of your patches I happen to notice [1],
why is there a SPL build for each
85 matches
Mail list logo
