Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] DaVinci DA8xx: fix set_cpu_clk_info()

2012-07-28 Thread Prabhakar Lad
Hi Laurence, Thanks for the patch. I have tested this patch, below are few comments. On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 4:19 PM, Laurence Withers lwith...@guralp.com wrote: For the DA8xx family of SoCs, the set_cpu_clk_info() function was not initialising the DSP frequency, leading to 'bdinfo' command

[U-Boot] [PATCH] image/FIT: Ramdisk Load, Entry address and OS tag inclusion

2012-07-28 Thread Jagan
From: Jagannadha Sutradharudu Teki 402ja...@gmail.com The current code in image.c doesn't include the Load, Entry address and OS tag to FIT image through mkimage tool. Due to this while extracting the ramdisk from FIT blob, bootm showing an error like... Can't get ramdisk subimage load

[U-Boot] [PATCH] image/FIT: Add ramdisk load, entry address and OS tag inclusion

2012-07-28 Thread Jagan
From: Jagannadha Sutradharudu Teki 402ja...@gmail.com This patch adds support to include Load, Entry address and OS tag of ramdisk on to FIT image through mkimage tool. Signed-off-by: Jagannadha Sutradharudu Teki 402ja...@gmail.com --- common/image.c |7 --- 1 files changed, 4

[U-Boot] V3: S3c64xx: Switch all I/O to use readl/writel functio and Clear variable

2012-07-28 Thread Zhong Hongbo
V3: 1. Replace ELFIN with S3C64XX for all the variable of cpu.h. 2. Change __S3C6400_H__ into __CPU__H__. 3. Use C language to implement memory initialization. 4. Use C language to re-write reset function. 5. Delete u-boot-nand.lds. V2: 1. Modify the type of return for s3c64xx_get_base_nand 2.

[U-Boot] [V3 01/15] smdk6400: Move smdk6400 board from Makefile to boards.cfg

2012-07-28 Thread Zhong Hongbo
From: Zhong Hongbo bocui...@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Zhong Hongbo bocui...@gmail.com --- Change for V3: - None Change for V2: - None --- Makefile | 20 board/samsung/smdk6400/config.mk |4 +--- boards.cfg |

[U-Boot] [V3 02/15] S3C64XX: Switch to use readl/writel to operate nand flash

2012-07-28 Thread Zhong Hongbo
From: Zhong Hongbo bocui...@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Zhong Hongbo bocui...@gmail.com --- Change for V3: - Replace the magic numbers with variable name. Change for V2: - Change the type of the return value from unsinged int to unsinged long for s3c64xx_get_base_uart

[U-Boot] [V3 03/15] S3C64XX: Use readl/writel to operate uart

2012-07-28 Thread Zhong Hongbo
From: Zhong Hongbo bocui...@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Zhong Hongbo bocui...@gmail.com --- Change for v3: - None. Change for V2: - Change the type of the return value from unsinged int to unsinged long for s3c64xx_get_base_uart function. - Delete const for the

[U-Boot] [V3 04/15] S3C64XX: add pwm for s3c64xx support

2012-07-28 Thread Zhong Hongbo
From: Zhong Hongbo bocui...@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Zhong Hongbo bocui...@gmail.com --- Change for V3: - None. Change for V2: - Change the type of the return value from unsinged int to unsinged long for s3c64xx_get_base_nand function. ---

[U-Boot] [V3 05/15] S3C64XX: reference s5p cpu time system for s3c64xx timer

2012-07-28 Thread Zhong Hongbo
From: Zhong Hongbo bocui...@gmail.com The old s3c64xx timer is not work normal, Adopt s5p time design, It work perfect. Signed-off-by: Zhong Hongbo bocui...@gmail.com --- Change for V3: - None. Change for V2: - Delete const key word for the variable of struct s3c_timer ---

[U-Boot] [V3 06/15] S3C64xx: mov cpu_init.S to the board directory

2012-07-28 Thread Zhong Hongbo
From: Zhong Hongbo bocui...@gmail.com It just only do the memory init. The memory depend on the design of board. Signed-off-by: Zhong Hongbo bocui...@gmail.com --- Change for V3: - None. Change for V2: - None. --- arch/arm/cpu/arm1176/s3c64xx/Makefile |2 +-

[U-Boot] [V3 08/15] S3C6400: Adopt SPL framwork to support spl for nand flash

2012-07-28 Thread Zhong Hongbo
From: Zhong Hongbo bocui...@gmail.com Adopt the new SPL framework to implement the SPL booting of the nand flash for S3C6400. Signed-off-by: Zhong Hongbo bocui...@gmail.com --- Change for V3: - None. Change for V2: - seprate some code. --- arch/arm/cpu/arm1176/start.S

[U-Boot] [V3 07/15] S3C6400: Delete nand_spl for S3C6400

2012-07-28 Thread Zhong Hongbo
From: Zhong Hongbo bocui...@gmail.com The old spl use nand_spl directory file to support nand flash boot. We will adopt the new SPL framework to implement it. Signed-off-by: Zhong Hongbo bocui...@gmail.com --- Change for V3: - Delete u-boot-nand.lds. Change for V2: - None. ---

[U-Boot] [V3 09/15] arm1176: Fixed No relocation.

2012-07-28 Thread Zhong Hongbo
From: Zhong Hongbo bocui...@gmail.com When It do not need to relocat for u-boot, the offset(r9) of relocation should be set zero. Signed-off-by: Zhong Hongbo bocui...@gmail.com --- Change for V3: - Replace mov with moveq. Change for V2: - Seprate some code. ---

[U-Boot] [V3 10/15] S3C64XX: Change SROM init to use read/write operation

2012-07-28 Thread Zhong Hongbo
From: Zhong Hongbo bocui...@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Zhong Hongbo bocui...@gmail.com --- Change for V3: - None. Change for V2: - Change the type of return for s3c64xx_get_base_sromc function. --- arch/arm/cpu/arm1176/s3c64xx/Makefile |2 +-

[U-Boot] [V3 11/15] S3C64XX: Switch to use read/writel to operation clock system

2012-07-28 Thread Zhong Hongbo
From: Zhong Hongbo bocui...@gmail.com Switch to use read/writel function and clear the relevant variable. Signed-off-by: Zhong Hongbo bocui...@gmail.com --- Change for V3: - Use C language to re-write reset function. - Replace the magic numbers witch variale name. Change for V2:

[U-Boot] [V3 12/15] S3c64xx: clear GPIO, Interrupt, Watchdog variable.

2012-07-28 Thread Zhong Hongbo
From: Zhong Hongbo bocui...@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Zhong Hongbo bocui...@gmail.com --- Change for V3: - Replace the magic numbers with the variable name. Change for V2: - None. --- arch/arm/include/asm/arch-s3c64xx/gpio.h | 38

[U-Boot] [V3 13/15] S3C6400: clear memory init variable

2012-07-28 Thread Zhong Hongbo
From: Zhong Hongbo bocui...@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Zhong Hongbo bocui...@gmail.com --- Change for V3: - Replace the magic numbers with variable name. - Use C language to implement memory initialization. Change for V2: - None. --- arch/arm/include/asm/arch-s3c64xx/dmc.h

[U-Boot] [V3 14/15] S3C64XX: Move s3c6400.h to cpu.h to support s3c6410 board

2012-07-28 Thread Zhong Hongbo
From: Zhong Hongbo bocui...@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Zhong Hongbo bocui...@gmail.com --- Change for V3: - Replace ELFIN with S3C64XX for all the variable of cpu.h - Change __S3C6400_H__ into __CPU__H__ Change for V2: - New. --- arch/arm/cpu/arm1176/s3c64xx/pwm.c

[U-Boot] [V3 15/15] S3C6400: Remove the unused variable for S3C6400

2012-07-28 Thread Zhong Hongbo
From: Zhong Hongbo bocui...@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Zhong Hongbo bocui...@gmail.com --- Change for V3: - None. Change for V2: - None. --- include/configs/smdk6400.h | 15 --- 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/configs/smdk6400.h

[U-Boot] [u-boot-arm/next RESEND PATCH 0/3] OMAP3: igep00x0: add nand flash and SPL support

2012-07-28 Thread Javier Martinez Canillas
IGEP-based boards can have two different flash memories, a OneNAND or a NAND device. Since u-boot still lacks of a device model to be the able to look at run-time which memory type is available on a the board, a built time config option is needed to choose which memory to use. This is a resend

[U-Boot] [u-boot-arm/next RESEND PATCH 1/3] OMAP3: igep00x0: Add config option to choose flash storage memory

2012-07-28 Thread Javier Martinez Canillas
IGEP-based boards can have two different flash memories, a OneNAND or a NAND device. Add a configuration option for to choose which memory to use. Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas jav...@dowhile0.org Acked-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra eballe...@gmail.com --- board/isee/igep0020/igep0020.h |

[U-Boot] [u-boot-arm/next RESEND PATCH 3/3] OMAP3: igep00x0: add SPL support for IGEP-based boards

2012-07-28 Thread Javier Martinez Canillas
This patch adds SPL support for IGEP-based boards. Tested on an IGEPv2 Rev.C board with Micron NAND Flash memory. Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas jav...@dowhile0.org --- board/isee/igep0020/config.mk | 33 board/isee/igep0020/igep0020.c | 42

[U-Boot] [u-boot-arm/next RESEND PATCH 2/3] OMAP3: mem: Add Numonyx OneNAND 200MHz timing information

2012-07-28 Thread Javier Martinez Canillas
Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas jav...@dowhile0.org --- arch/arm/include/asm/arch-omap3/mem.h | 29 + 1 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-omap3/mem.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-omap3/mem.h index

[U-Boot] dwc_ahsata vs ahci

2012-07-28 Thread Pavel Herrmann
Hi, While working on the DM project, I found out that there are two implementations of AHCI drivers - one in block/ahci.c, one in block/dwc_ahsata.c what is the difference between them (apart from the obvious, ahci.c exposes SCSI API, dwc_ahsata exposes SATA API)? are there any problems that

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] COMMON: Add __stringify() function

2012-07-28 Thread Marek Vasut
This function converts static number to string in preprocessor. This is useful as it allows higher usage of puts() in favour of printf() Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut ma...@denx.de Cc: Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de Cc: Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org --- include/common.h |7 +++ 1 file

[U-Boot] [RFC] [PATCH 2/2] crazy: Sort u_boot_cmd at runtime

2012-07-28 Thread Marek Vasut
This shall eliminate the need for bubblesorting of commands at runtime. Every command definition structure is now put into it's own subsection of section .u_boot_cmd, that is .u_boot_cmd.name . These are then put into .u_boot_cmd by linker and lastly, linker uses SORT() over these subsections to

[U-Boot] early_malloc() vs. enable_caches()

2012-07-28 Thread Tomas Hlavacek
Hello! I am working on early_malloc() for U-Boot Driver Model (this malloc is going to serve for internal DM structures during early init and it has it's minimalistic heap in global data). My question is how to correctly switch from early allocator to full-scale malloc and when to enable caches.

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC] [PATCH 2/2] crazy: Sort u_boot_cmd at runtime

2012-07-28 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Marek Vasut, In message 1343483279-11572-2-git-send-email-ma...@denx.de you wrote: This shall eliminate the need for bubblesorting of commands at runtime. Every command definition structure is now put into it's own subsection of section .u_boot_cmd, that is .u_boot_cmd.name . These are

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC] [PATCH 2/2] crazy: Sort u_boot_cmd at runtime

2012-07-28 Thread Marek Vasut
Dear Wolfgang Denk, Dear Marek Vasut, In message 1343483279-11572-2-git-send-email-ma...@denx.de you wrote: This shall eliminate the need for bubblesorting of commands at runtime. Every command definition structure is now put into it's own subsection of section .u_boot_cmd, that is

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] spi: microblaze: Adds driver for Xilinx SPI controller

2012-07-28 Thread Stephan Linz
Hi Michal, I'll resubmit a new patch which fixes your notes. br, Stephan Am Dienstag, den 24.07.2012, 12:56 +0200 schrieb Michal Simek: On 07/14/2012 12:30 AM, Stephan Linz wrote: This is an improved version of the driver patch original submitted by Graeme Smecher

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] COMMON: Add __stringify() function

2012-07-28 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Marek Vasut, In message 1343483279-11572-1-git-send-email-ma...@denx.de you wrote: This function converts static number to string in preprocessor. This is useful as it allows higher usage of puts() in favour of printf() Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut ma...@denx.de Cc: Wolfgang Denk

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] COMMON: Add __stringify() function

2012-07-28 Thread Marek Vasut
Dear Wolfgang Denk, Dear Marek Vasut, In message 1343483279-11572-1-git-send-email-ma...@denx.de you wrote: This function converts static number to string in preprocessor. This is useful as it allows higher usage of puts() in favour of printf() Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC] [PATCH 2/2] crazy: Sort u_boot_cmd at runtime

2012-07-28 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Marek Vasut, In message 201207282039.34518.ma...@denx.de you wrote: Seems incomplete in several aspects: Below the section: * NOTE * THIS PATCH IS CRAZY Then what is actually the purpose of such a posting? Just dumping unsorted thoughts to community? You are experienced enough

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] COMMON: Add __stringify() function

2012-07-28 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Marek Vasut, In message 201207282139.05998.ma...@denx.de you wrote: include/common.h |7 +++ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) We have similar things already, and we don't add dead code - you add a macro without users here. It's used in 2/2 ... what macro do you have

Re: [U-Boot] mx28evk kernel does not boot with 2012.07-rc3

2012-07-28 Thread Fabio Estevam
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 3:14 PM, Fabio Estevam feste...@gmail.com wrote: Bytes transferred = 3343968 (330660 hex) ## Booting kernel from Legacy Image at 4200 ... Image Name: Linux-3.5.0-next-20120727+ Created: 2012-07-27 17:27:30 UTC Image Type: ARM Linux Kernel Image

Re: [U-Boot] Building u-boot for iMX28 and getting error in mkimage of missing command line parameter CONFIG_IMX_CONFIG

2012-07-28 Thread Fabio Estevam
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 3:15 PM, Fabio Estevam feste...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 12:35 PM, Bill bsou...@techsi.com wrote: Thanks. I tried that and got the same results. Are there any debug/logging that I can use to see what's going on? I just tried it here and 2012.07-rc3

Re: [U-Boot] mx28evk kernel does not boot with 2012.07-rc3

2012-07-28 Thread Fabio Estevam
Hi Wolfgang, On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 4:43 PM, Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote: I understand we put the release on hold until I hear from you / see a patch / pull request ? Please go ahead with the release. It was an operator error from my side. 2012.07-rc3 boots the kernel correctly on

Re: [U-Boot] mx28evk kernel does not boot with 2012.07-rc3

2012-07-28 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Fabio, In message caomzo5cahcapwv0gmryo1fdeauwos7vyqlfvgss4u8djk88...@mail.gmail.com you wrote: I understand we put the release on hold until I hear from you / see a patch / pull request ? Please go ahead with the release. It was an operator error from my side. 2012.07-rc3 boots

Re: [U-Boot] [U-Boot-DM] [PATCH 1/1] early_malloc() introduced to ARM architecture

2012-07-28 Thread Marek Vasut
Dear Tomas Hlavacek, I think we should still mark early patches as RFC. early_malloc() introduced to ARM architecture (it is a proof of concept). GD datastructure extended for holding early-heap. mem_malloc_init() in board_init_r() has been put up by few lines. I take it was sent by the

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC] [PATCH 2/2] crazy: Sort u_boot_cmd at runtime

2012-07-28 Thread Marek Vasut
Dear Wolfgang Denk, Dear Marek Vasut, In message 201207282039.34518.ma...@denx.de you wrote: Seems incomplete in several aspects: Below the section: * NOTE * THIS PATCH IS CRAZY Then what is actually the purpose of such a posting? Just dumping unsorted thoughts to community?

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] COMMON: Add __stringify() function

2012-07-28 Thread Marek Vasut
Dear Wolfgang Denk, Dear Marek Vasut, In message 201207282139.05998.ma...@denx.de you wrote: include/common.h |7 +++ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) We have similar things already, and we don't add dead code - you add a macro without users here. It's used in

[U-Boot] [PATCH v4] MX28: extend print_cpuinfo() to use chip information

2012-07-28 Thread Otavio Salvador
The information now is gathered from HW_DIGCTL_CHIPID register and includes the chip modem and revision on the output. Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador ota...@ossystems.com.br --- Changes in v2: - use ?? for unidentified revision and cpu type - use numeric revisions Changes in v3: - drop mx23 data

[U-Boot] [PATCH v3] MX28: use a clear name for DDR2 initialization

2012-07-28 Thread Otavio Salvador
The mx28 prefix has been added to the initialization data and function so it is clear by which SoC it is used as i.MX233 will have a specific one. While on that, we also change it to static. Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador ota...@ossystems.com.br --- Changes in v2: - use static for the allocation

[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] microblaze: Wire up SPI driver

2012-07-28 Thread Stephan Linz
Depending on XILINX_SPI_FLASH_BASEADDR enable SPI flash and environment in SPI flash. Expected values from xparameters.h are: - XILINX_SPI_FLASH_BASEADDR - XILINX_SPI_FLASH_MAX_FREQ - XILINX_SPI_FLASH_CS Signed-off-by: Stephan Linz l...@li-pro.net ---

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] spi: microblaze: Adds driver for Xilinx SPI controller

2012-07-28 Thread Stephan Linz
This is an improved version of the driver patch original submitted by Graeme Smecher graeme.smec...@mail.mcgill.ca The changes are: - remove hard coded Xilinx BSP defines (XPAR_SPI_*) and use CONFIG_SYS_SPI_BASE from config.h instead - add extensive register struct definitions -

[U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 0/5] Rework for mxs SoC family support

2012-07-28 Thread Otavio Salvador
This patchset is the basis for inclusion of i.MX233 support on U-Boot. To accomplish it, this patchset moves code around to create the mxs SoC family support. The idea of posting it on the mailing list is to receive comments on ways to improve the patchset and also try to merge it during the

[U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 1/5] mxs: reorganize source directory for easy sharing of code in i.MXS SoCs

2012-07-28 Thread Otavio Salvador
Most code can be shared between i.MX23 and i.MX28 as both are from i.MXS family; this source directory structure makes easy to share code among them. Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador ota...@ossystems.com.br --- arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/{mx28 = mxs}/Makefile |0

[U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 2/5] mxs: prefix register acessor macros with 'mxs' prefix

2012-07-28 Thread Otavio Salvador
As the register accessing mode is the same for all i.MXS SoCs we ought to use 'mxs' prefix intead of 'mx28'. Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador ota...@ossystems.com.br --- arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/mxs/clock.c |4 +- arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/mxs/iomux.c |6 +-

[U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 3/5] mxs: prefix register structs with 'mxs' prefix

2012-07-28 Thread Otavio Salvador
Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador ota...@ossystems.com.br --- arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/mxs/clock.c | 36 arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/mxs/mx28.c| 28 +++--- arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/mxs/spl_lradc_init.c |4 +- arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/mxs/spl_mem_init.c| 24 +++---

[U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 4/5] mxs: Reowork SPL to use 'mxs' prefix for methods

2012-07-28 Thread Otavio Salvador
Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador ota...@ossystems.com.br --- arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/mxs/mx28.c |8 +- .../cpu/arm926ejs/mxs/{mx28_init.h = mxs_init.h} | 14 +- arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/mxs/spl_boot.c | 20 +-- arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/mxs/spl_lradc_init.c|

[U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 5/5] mxs: rename mx28.c to mxs.c as it is common to i.MX233 and i.MX28 SoCs

2012-07-28 Thread Otavio Salvador
Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador ota...@ossystems.com.br --- arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/mxs/Makefile |2 +- arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/mxs/{mx28.c = mxs.c} |0 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) rename arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/mxs/{mx28.c = mxs.c} (100%) diff --git

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 2/5] ehci-hcd: Boost transfer speed

2012-07-28 Thread Benoît Thébaudeau
Dear Stefan, Sorry for the delay. I'm very busy, and there is much to tell on this topic. On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 03:02:00 PM, Stefan Herbrechtsmeier wrote: Am 23.07.2012 19:15, schrieb Benoît Thébaudeau: On Monday 23 July 2012 15:35:25 Stefan Herbrechtsmeier wrote: Am 20.07.2012 17:35,

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/5] ehci-hcd: Boost transfer speed

2012-07-28 Thread Benoît Thébaudeau
Dear Marek, On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 04:13:45 PM, Benoît Thébaudeau wrote: On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 04:01:11 PM, Marek Vasut wrote: [...] + token = (toggle 31) | + (xfr_bytes 16) | + ((req == NULL ? 1 : 0) 15)

Re: [U-Boot] usb_stor_BBB_transport 5 ms delay - performance

2012-07-28 Thread Benoît Thébaudeau
Dear Marek, On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 07:44:04 PM, Marek Vasut wrote: I did see a flags field but thought having a new one was conservative (I had no real reason to have a new field). As for the typecasts I was following the API which tests for device ready (Monkey See Monkey Do).

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 2/5] mxs: prefix register acessor macros with 'mxs' prefix

2012-07-28 Thread Marek Vasut
Dear Otavio Salvador, As the register accessing mode is the same for all i.MXS SoCs we ought to use 'mxs' prefix intead of 'mx28'. Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador ota...@ossystems.com.br --- arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/mxs/clock.c |4 +- arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/mxs/iomux.c

Re: [U-Boot] usb_stor_BBB_transport 5 ms delay - performance

2012-07-28 Thread Marek Vasut
Dear Benoît Thébaudeau, Dear Marek, On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 07:44:04 PM, Marek Vasut wrote: I did see a flags field but thought having a new one was conservative (I had no real reason to have a new field). As for the typecasts I was following the API which tests for device

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/5] ehci-hcd: Boost transfer speed

2012-07-28 Thread Marek Vasut
Dear Benoît Thébaudeau, Dear Marek, On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 04:13:45 PM, Benoît Thébaudeau wrote: On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 04:01:11 PM, Marek Vasut wrote: [...] + token = (toggle 31) | + (xfr_bytes 16) | +

Re: [U-Boot] RFC - PatchTrack Specification (revised)

2012-07-28 Thread Marek Vasut
Dear Graeme Russ, A revised version of the spec (sorry, I would have used reply-to but something went amiss with gmail and I've lost the original) How does it surprise me ... superawesome google imap just crashed on me like a week ago, I finished syncing my emails today ... [...] Operation

Re: [U-Boot] RFC - PatchTrack Specification (revised)

2012-07-28 Thread Graeme Russ
Hi Marek, For future reference, please comment against: Take a look at http://www.denx.de/wiki/U-Boot/ToolsPatchTracking On 07/29/2012 01:15 PM, Marek Vasut wrote: Dear Graeme Russ, You might want to actually create an mbox of all these stacked patches so people can download and apply