Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] mx7dsabresd_secure_defconfig: Use CONFIG_ARMV7_BOOT_SEC_DEFAULT

On 22/07/2016 20:21, Fabio Estevam wrote: > There is no need for introducing MX7_SEC, as there is the > CONFIG_ARMV7_BOOT_SEC_DEFAULT option for this purpose. > > Switch to CONFIG_ARMV7_BOOT_SEC_DEFAULT and get rid of > MX7_SEC. > > Tested by booting a 4.1.15 NXP kernel with

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 4/4] mmc: add workaround for eSDHC erratum A009620

> -Original Message- > From: york sun > Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2016 10:48 PM > To: Yangbo Lu; u-boot@lists.denx.de > Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] mmc: add workaround for eSDHC erratum A009620 > > On 07/27/2016 12:10 AM, Yangbo Lu wrote: > >> -Original Message- > >> From: york sun >

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] mmc: send CMD0 before CMD1 for some MMC cards

Hi Yangbo, On 07/28/2016 11:45 AM, Yangbo Lu wrote: > Hi Ziyuan and Jaehoon, > > >> -Original Message- >> From: Ziyuan Xu [mailto:xzy...@rock-chips.com] >> Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2016 9:37 PM >> To: Jaehoon Chung; Yangbo Lu; u-boot@lists.denx.de; Tom Rini >> Cc: Pantelis Antoniou >>

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] config.h: clean unused CONFIG_ENV_SPI_* if using driver model

Hi York, > -Original Message- > From: york sun > Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2016 10:55 PM > To: Qianyu Gong ; u-boot@lists.denx.de; Simon Glass > > Cc: Shaohui Xie ; Zhiqiang Hou ; > Wenbin Song

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] treewide: move CONFIG_PHYS_64BIT to Kconfig

Masahiro-san >>#if !defined(CONFIG_PPC_P5020) && !defined(CONFIG_PPC_P5040) #error Must >>call Cyrus CONFIG with a specific CPU enabled. >>#endif >>diff --git a/include/configs/dra7xx_evm.h >>b/include/configs/dra7xx_evm.h index 0d51aeb..a11b692 100644 >>--- a/include/configs/dra7xx_evm.h

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] treewide: move CONFIG_PHYS_64BIT to Kconfig

Masahiro-san >#if !defined(CONFIG_PPC_P5020) && !defined(CONFIG_PPC_P5040) #error Must call >Cyrus CONFIG with a specific CPU enabled. >#endif >diff --git a/include/configs/dra7xx_evm.h b/include/configs/dra7xx_evm.h index >0d51aeb..a11b692 100644 >--- a/include/configs/dra7xx_evm.h >+++

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] mmc: dw_mmc: fix data starvation by host timeout under FIFO mode

Hi Ziyuan, On 07/28/2016 11:25 AM, Ziyuan Xu wrote: > This patch fixes data starvation by host timeout(HTO) error interrupt > which occurred under FIFO mode transfer on rk3036 board. > > The former implement, the actual bytes were transmitted may be less than > should be. The size will still

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] mmc: dw_mmc: transfer proper bytes to FIFO

Hi Ziyuan, On 07/28/2016 11:25 AM, Ziyuan Xu wrote: > The former implement, dw_mmc will push and pop the redundant data to > FIFO, we should transfer it according to the real size. Looks good to me. Acked-by: Jaehoon Chung Best Regards, Jaehoon Chung > >

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] libfdt: Introduce new ARCH_FIXUP_FDT option

On 28.7.2016 04:24, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Michal, > > On 24 July 2016 at 20:07, Simon Glass wrote: >> On 15 July 2016 at 01:35, Michal Simek wrote: >>> Add new Kconfig option to disable arch_fixup_fdt() calls for cases where >>> U-Boot shouldn't

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 02/30] x86: ivybridge: Allow microcode to be collated

On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 8:58 AM, Simon Glass wrote: > Generally the microcode is combined into a single block only (and removed > from the device tree) when there are multiple blocks. But this is not a > requirement. > > Adjust the ivybridge code to avoid assuming this. > >

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 03/30] x86: Add debugging when cpu_common_init() fails

On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 8:58 AM, Simon Glass wrote: > Add a debug() at this point to help figure out what is wrong. > > Signed-off-by: Simon Glass > --- > > arch/x86/cpu/ivybridge/cpu.c | 4 +++- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 01/30] x86: Add debugging when a microcode update fails

On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 8:58 AM, Simon Glass wrote: > Add a debug() at this point to help figure out what is wrong. > > Signed-off-by: Simon Glass > --- > > arch/x86/cpu/intel_common/cpu.c | 4 +++- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 4/4] mmc: add workaround for eSDHC erratum A009620

Hi Jaehoon, > -Original Message- > From: Jaehoon Chung [mailto:jh80.ch...@samsung.com] > Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2016 1:01 PM > To: Yangbo Lu; york sun; u-boot@lists.denx.de > Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 4/4] mmc: add workaround for eSDHC erratum > A009620 > > Hi Yangbo, > > On

[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] fs/fat: Optimizes memory size with single global variable instead of 3

Single 64KB get_contents_vfatname_block global variable would be used for all FAT implementation instead of allocating additional two global variables which are get_denfromdir_block and do_fat_read_at_block. This implementation can help in saving up 128KB memory space. Signed-off-by: Tien Fong

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] fs/fat/fatwrite: Local variable as buffer to store dir_slot entries

fill_dir_slot use get_contents_vfatname_block as a temporary buffer for constructing a list of dir_slot entries. To save the memory and providing correct type of memory for above usage, a local buffer with accurate size declaration is introduced. The local array size 640 is used because for long

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 4/4] mmc: add workaround for eSDHC erratum A009620

Hi Jaehoon, > -Original Message- > From: Jaehoon Chung [mailto:jh80.ch...@samsung.com] > Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2016 7:21 PM > To: Yangbo Lu; york sun; u-boot@lists.denx.de > Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 4/4] mmc: add workaround for eSDHC erratum > A009620 > > On 07/27/2016 04:10 PM,

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] x86: som-db5800-som-6867: fix SERIRQ on reset

On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 6:01 AM, George McCollister wrote: > Pad configuration for SERIRQ is not set to enable the SERIRQ function > on soft reset though strangely, it is on initial boot. > What does "soft reset" mean? > Signed-off-by: George McCollister

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] mmc: sdhci: revert "mmc: sdhci: Claer high speed if not supported"

Hi All, On 07/26/2016 07:03 PM, Jaehoon Chung wrote: > This "commit 429790026021d522d51617217d4b86218cca5750" is wrong. > SDHCI_QUIRK_NO_HISPD_BIT is for skipping to set CTRL_HISPD bit. > > For example, Exynos didn't have CTRL_HISPD. But Highspeed mode > is supported. > (This quirks doesn't mean

<    1   2