If there are aliases for an uclass, set the base for the "dynamically"
allocated numbers next to the highest alias.
Please note, that this might lead to holes in the sequences, depending
on the device tree. For example if there is only an alias "ethernet1",
the next device seq number would be 2.
If there are aliases for an uclass, set the base for the "dynamically"
allocated numbers next to the highest alias.
The actual patch is 3, the first two patches will fix some breakage which
would be introduced with patch 3.
changes since v6:
- added new patch to fix dev_read_alias_highest_id()
If CONFIG_DM_DEV_READ_INLINE is set, dev_read_alias_highest_id() calls
libfdt_get_highest_id(). But this function is only available if we have
libfdt compiled in. If its not available return -1, which matches the
return code for no alias found.
This fixes the following error on omapl138_lcdk:
Heinrich,
On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 08:58:02AM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> On 5/29/20 8:41 AM, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> > There are a couple of occurrences of hash calculations in which a new
> > efi_hash_regions will be commonly used.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: AKASHI Takahiro
> > ---
> >
Hi Rick,
On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 1:23 PM Rick Chen wrote:
>
> Hi Bin
>
> > Hi Rick,
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 1, 2020 at 3:40 PM Rick Chen wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Bin
> > >
> > > > Hi Rick,
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 4:24 PM Bin Meng wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi Rick,
> > > > >
> > > > >
On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 09:04:11AM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> On 5/29/20 8:41 AM, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> > Currently, we don't use any regular expression in matching outputs from
> > U-Boot. Since its use is just redundant, we can remove all.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: AKASHI Takahiro
>
>
Heinrich,
On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 09:01:53AM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> On 5/29/20 8:41 AM, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> > A signed image may have multiple signatures in
> > - each WIN_CERTIFICATE in authenticode, and/or
> > - each SignerInfo in pkcs7 SignedData (of WIN_CERTIFICATE)
> >
Hi Bin
> Hi Rick,
>
> On Mon, Jun 1, 2020 at 3:40 PM Rick Chen wrote:
> >
> > Hi Bin
> >
> > > Hi Rick,
> > >
> > > On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 4:24 PM Bin Meng wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi Rick,
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 4:17 PM Rick Chen wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi Bin
> > > > >
> >
Heinrich,
On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 09:09:30AM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> On 5/29/20 8:41 AM, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> > In case that a type of certificate in "db" or "dbx" is
> > EFI_CERT_X509_SHA256_GUID, it is actually not a certificate which contains
> > a public key for RSA
101 - 109 of 109 matches
Mail list logo