Hi
> > > > +#ifdef CFG_SDR_CONFIG
> > > > mov r1, #CFG_SDR_CONFIG
> > > > + mov r9, #0xff
> > > > +#else
> > > > + mov r1, #0x1d /* 256 MB, two banks of 128 MB */
> > > > + mov r9, #0
> > > > +#endif
> > >
> > > I don't want such $ifdef's in global code.
> According to the 8548 and 8572 manuals (not sure about others...), the
> TBIPA register value for all PHYs is 0x0 at reset, which is reserved
> according to the manuals. The description of the MIIMADD register
> supports this by stating: "Up to 31 PHYs can be addressed (0 is
> reserved)". So I
Hi Andy,
> >> > @@ -299,12 +301,10 @@ static int init_phy(struct eth_device *dev)
> >> > {
> >> >struct tsec_private *priv = (struct tsec_private *)dev->priv;
> >> >struct phy_info *curphy;
> >> > - volatile tsec_t *phyregs = priv->phyregs;
> >> >volatile tsec_t *reg
Dear Wolfgang,
Please pull u-boot-sh repositry.
The following changes since commit c0d2f87d6c450128b88e73eea715fa3654f65b6c:
Wolfgang Denk (1):
Prepare v2008.10-rc2
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.denx.de/u-boot-sh.git master
Nobuhiro Iwamatsu (1):
sh: rsk72
On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 5:17 PM, Peter Tyser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-09-15 at 16:13 -0500, Andy Fleming wrote:
>> > @@ -299,12 +301,10 @@ static int init_phy(struct eth_device *dev)
>> > {
>> >struct tsec_private *priv = (struct tsec_private *)dev->priv;
>> >struc
Signed-off-by: Victor Gallardo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Adam Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
board/amcc/kilauea/kilauea.c| 31 +++
cpu/ppc4xx/4xx_ibm_ddr2_autocalib.c |5 -
include/asm-ppc/ppc4xx-sdram.h |8
3 files changed,
On Mon, 2008-09-15 at 16:13 -0500, Andy Fleming wrote:
> > @@ -299,12 +301,10 @@ static int init_phy(struct eth_device *dev)
> > {
> >struct tsec_private *priv = (struct tsec_private *)dev->priv;
> >struct phy_info *curphy;
> > - volatile tsec_t *phyregs = priv->phyregs;
> >
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 4:54 AM, Wolfgang Denk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD,
>
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>>
>> please take a look hear
>>
>> I've already send patch to fix X86
>>
>> 4698 F May18 To u-boot-users [PATCH 00/17] x86: Fix warning
Dear Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD,
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> Please pull, into your master and u-boot-next,
Umm
> Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD (2):
> Revert "ARM: set GD_FLG_RELOC for boards skipping relocation to RAM"
> ARM: set GD_FLG_RELOC at board
Hi Wolfgang,
Please pull, into your master and u-boot-next,
The following changes since commit c0d2f87d6c450128b88e73eea715fa3654f65b6c:
Wolfgang Denk (1):
Prepare v2008.10-rc2
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.denx.de/u-boot-arm.git master
Guennadi Liakhovetski (1):
> @@ -299,12 +301,10 @@ static int init_phy(struct eth_device *dev)
> {
>struct tsec_private *priv = (struct tsec_private *)dev->priv;
>struct phy_info *curphy;
> - volatile tsec_t *phyregs = priv->phyregs;
>volatile tsec_t *regs = priv->regs;
>
>/* Assign a P
WILL CLOSE THIS MONTH. HOT !!
Title: Oracle developer strong in PL/SQL coding.
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Length: 6+ Months
Industry: Financial
KEY EXPERIENCE:
Experience : 6 to 7 Years
Skills: Good Exp in RDBMS Concepts, Strong PL/SQL, SQL , OLTP, Unix Shell
Scripting, Da
On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 19:07:52 +0200
Wolfgang Denk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Gary Jennejohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Sorry, but I don't understand what you're doing here, or why.
>
> Why would there be any machine checks in scc_i
Hi Wolfgang,
from this discussion, I have understood that the problem is that mips code
lacks the support interrupts in iv mode. I will try to do something (support
of IV modality... for example).
Thanks again,
luigi
Il domenica 14 settembre 2008 17:59:46 Wolfgang Denk ha scritto:
> Dear "Lu
Hi Wolfgang,
from this discussion, I have understood that the problem is that mips code
lacks the support interrupts in iv mode. I will try to do something (support
of IV modality... for example).
Thanks again,
luigi
Il domenica 14 settembre 2008 17:59:46 Wolfgang Denk ha scritto:
> Dear "Lu
Several minor corrections to allow clean builds of new i386 and sc520
based boards based on 2008.10
Signed-off-by: Graeme Russ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
diff --git a/cpu/i386/sc520.c b/cpu/i386/sc520.c
index 640b255..b68dfd6 100644
--- a/cpu/i386/sc520.c
+++ b/cpu/i386/sc520.c
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@
#i
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> cpu/omap3/Makefile|3
> cpu/omap3/mmc.c | 557
> ++
drivers/mmc/omap3_mmc.c is perhaps better?
Haavard
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.d
Dear Magnus,
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> It seems to me that this patch is not present in 2008.10-rc2, but the
> patch adding the README.imx31 describing the HIGH_PRECISION-flag has
> been merged (looking in both Wolfgang's tree and the arm-next tree).
I agree. The partial merg
18 matches
Mail list logo