[U-Boot] {Spam?} We have data for many medical specialties

Practicing MDs in the United States Most medical specialties covered you can sort by many different fields Price for new customers - $392 !!! If you order by the end of the week you can take all the items below for fr ee !!! ++ Dentists ++ Veterinarians ++ Physical Therapists

Re: [U-Boot] PrimeCell Peripherals

HI, > From: Roman Mashak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [U-Boot] PrimeCell Peripherals > > To add a bit to my previous message. > > As far as I understood from U-Boot's README, a standalone > mode can and may want to use interrupts -- so it'd reasonable > to have interrupts controll

Re: [U-Boot] PrimeCell Peripherals

Hi, 2008/9/23 Gururaja Hebbar K R <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > At $(U_BOOT)/drivers/net/bcm570x.c files header, it says > > * Broadcom BCM570x Ethernet Driver for U-Boot. > * Support 5701, 5702, 5703, and 5704. Single instance driver. > > --> Single Instance Driver. Does this mean it doesn't handle I

[U-Boot] [PATCH] ppc: Fix typo in include/mpc83xx.h

Fixed typo from CONIFG_MPC837X to CONFIG_MPC837X Signed-off-by: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- include/mpc83xx.h |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/mpc83xx.h b/include/mpc83xx.h index 5d82bb4..7f30d68 100644 --- a/include/mpc83xx.h +++ b/i

Re: [U-Boot] PrimeCell Peripherals

Hi, > In U-Boot source tree there are number of drivers with > interrupt service routines running (for example, > $(U_BOOT)/drivers/net/bcm570x.c) as well as various > interrupts related macros (some of them not used thought), if > this is what you mean. > Perhaps these definitions are for fut

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] pci: Divided pci code of the powerpc

Hi, all. 2008/9/23 Stefan Roese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Monday 22 September 2008, Andrew Dyer wrote: >> >> I did a simple check. >> >> >> >> Only powerpc and i386 and sh seem to use PCI. >> >> If powerpc does not have a problem, would you commit it? >> > >> > Do I have your "go" (or at least no

Re: [U-Boot] PrimeCell Peripherals

To add a bit to my previous message. 2008/9/23 Gururaja Hebbar K R <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Thats because Most of the ARM based boards doesnt use Interrupts. Atleast as > far as i have seen. As far as I understood from U-Boot's README, a standalone mode can and may want to use interrupts -- so it'

Re: [U-Boot] PrimeCell Peripherals

Hello, 2008/9/23 Gururaja Hebbar K R <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Thats because Most of the ARM based boards doesnt use Interrupts. Atleast as > far as i have seen. > IIRC U-boot is a single process bootloader & hence Interrupts are not so much > supported. > Is there any interrupt related drivers in

Re: [U-Boot] PrimeCell Peripherals

Hi, > From: Roman Mashak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [U-Boot] PrimeCell Peripherals > > Right, that's what I've found in the U-Boot sources. How come > that widely used interrupt controllers like PL19x are not > supported by default? Thats because Most of the ARM based boards doe

Re: [U-Boot] PrimeCell Peripherals

Hello, 2008/9/23 Hebbar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I use U-booot as The Primary Bootloader on arm926ej-s based Board. > > By Default U-boot supports few Primecell peripherals drivers like PL0x1 > UART. Right, that's what I've found in the U-Boot sources. How come that widely used interrupt controller

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Add support for CONFIG_EFI_PARTITION (GUID Partition Table)

> Also, please enlighten me: what is "EFI", and what is a "GUID" > partition table, and which systems do use that? EFI is the PC BIOS replacement that Intel came up with, most notably used on Apple's Intel based computers. A blurb about EFI is here - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extensible_Firmwa

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Add support for CONFIG_EFI_PARTITION (GUID Partition Table)

Dear richardretanubun, In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > Signed-off-by: Richard Retanubun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > --- > > disk/Makefile |1 + > > disk/part.c | 33 - > > disk/part_efi.c | 428 > +++ > > disk/part_ef

[U-Boot] [PATCH] Add support for CONFIG_EFI_PARTITION (GUID Partition Table)

Signed-off-by: Richard Retanubun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- disk/Makefile |1 + disk/part.c | 33 - disk/part_efi.c | 428 +++ disk/part_efi.h | 138 ++ include/part.h |8 + 5 files changed, 605 insertion

Re: [U-Boot] Uboot-1.2.0 on MPC8360EMDS board

Dear Mike, In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > I am having problem when I try to bootup MPC8360EMDS with Uboot1.2. > The following are logs. The board reboot when the uboot tried to run > on the RAM. Any idea on this issue? ... > U-Boot 1.2.1 (Sep 23 2008 - 14:35:42) MPC83XX It's diffi

Re: [U-Boot] What's needed for new cpu subdirectory?

Dear Dirk, In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > For OMAP3 patch [1] I try to move common files currently in cpu/omap3 > to cpu/arm_cortexa8/omap3 as discussed earlier [2]. Ummm... if it's common files - shouldn't these go to cpu/arm_cortexa8/ then, and cpu/arm_cortexa8/omap3/ would hav

Re: [U-Boot] Uboot-1.2.0 on MPC8360EMDS board

Hi Mike, I'm very new to Powerpc so take my words with a lot of precautions. I see two possibilities with your problem: 1. As U-Boot seems to reset after "Stack Pointer at: 0ffa9f28", you are likely to encounter a relocation issue. As I have learnt it the hard way (I cannot count the number of t

[U-Boot] Uboot-1.2.0 on MPC8360EMDS board

Hello, I am having problem when I try to bootup MPC8360EMDS with Uboot1.2. The following are logs. The board reboot when the uboot tried to run on the RAM. Any idea on this issue? Thanks, Mike U-Boot 1.2.1 (Sep 23 2008 - 14:35:42) MPC83XX Clock configuration: Coherent System Bus: 264 MHz C

Re: [U-Boot] u-boot-v2 for imx27 Board

Hi, I was running U-boot-v2 on imx27ads board and it's hanging up on the terminal after the following display. U-Boot 2.0.0-rc5-git (Sep 22 2008 - 23:05:39) Board: Freescale i.MX27 ADS - Also I am using Intel P30 strata flash. When the MTD cfi driver is enabled in the menucon

[U-Boot] What's needed for new cpu subdirectory?

For OMAP3 patch [1] I try to move common files currently in cpu/omap3 to cpu/arm_cortexa8/omap3 as discussed earlier [2]. Moving the files is easy, but how has main Makefile to be configured? I have > ls -a cpu/arm_cortexa8/ . .. omap3 > ls -a cpu/arm_cortexa8/omap3/ . board.c config.m

[U-Boot] [PATCH] Remove unused CFG_EEPROM_PAGE_WRITE_ENABLE references

Signed-off-by: Peter Tyser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- doc/README.PIP405|8 include/configs/APC405.h |1 - include/configs/ASH405.h |1 - include/configs/B2.h |1 - include/configs/CATcenter.h |1 - include/configs/CMS700.h

[U-Boot] [PATCH] Remove CFG_EEPROM_PAGE* dependencies for temperature sensors

The checks for CFG_EEPROM_PAGE_WRITE_ENABLE and CFG_EEPROM_PAGE_WRITE_BITS in various temperature sensor drivers are not necessary Signed-off-by: Peter Tyser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- drivers/hwmon/ds1621.c |5 - drivers/hwmon/lm75.c |6 -- drivers/hwmon/lm81.c |6 -- 3

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] 85xx: Remove setting of *cache-line-size in device trees

On Sep 16, 2008, at 11:36 AM, Kumar Gala wrote: > ePAPR says if the *cache-block-size is the same as *cache-line-size > than we don't need the *cache-line-size property. > > Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > --- > cpu/mpc85xx/fdt.c |3 --- > 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 3 de

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] 440spe MQ initialization

Hi Prodyut, On Tuesday, September 23, 2008 you wrote: > Hi Yuri, >> Is it OK, or should we remove these strings from the Linux driver, >> assuming U-Boot has already done this ? > Please go ahead and remove these from the linux driver. Thanks for confirmation, will do. > And I think this

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] 440spe MQ initialization

Hi Yuri, > Is it OK, or should we remove these strings from the Linux driver, > assuming U-Boot has already done this ? Please go ahead and remove these from the linux driver. And I think this driver has not been submitted to the powerpc tree, since I still don't see it in Josh's or Linus's tre

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] 440spe MQ initialization

Hello Prodyut, On Tuesday, September 23, 2008 you wrote: > Hi Stefan/Yuri, > I looked at the changes. > I had already submitted the changes in an earlier patch. This code > to set the PLB4 arbiter depth was moved to cpu_init_f function in > cpu/ppc4xx/cpu_init.c since it is common across many p

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] 440spe MQ initialization

Hi Yuri/Stefan, I remember duriing my testing that the default Read passing limit (RPML) and MCIF limit (WRCL) was 1. So there was no need to set these registers again to the same values. Thanks, Prodyut : Tue 9/23/2008 2:43 AM To: Yuri Tikhonov Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de; Prodyut Hazarika; O

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] 440spe MQ initialization

Hi Stefan/Yuri, I looked at the changes. I had already submitted the changes in an earlier patch. This code to set the PLB4 arbiter depth was moved to cpu_init_f function in cpu/ppc4xx/cpu_init.c since it is common across many processor families. Please don't do the same thing again in the pro

[U-Boot] [RFC][PATCH v4] bootm: Add sub commands

* Use new find_cmd_tbl() to process sub-commands If this looks good I'll go ahead and clean it up for the other arches and OSes. --- common/cmd_bootm.c | 142 - include/image.h| 20 - lib_ppc/bootm.c| 262 ++-

[U-Boot] [PATCH] Expose command table search for sub-commands

Sub-command can benefit from using the same table and search functions that top level commands have. Expose this functionality by refactoring find_cmd() and introducing find_cmd_tbl() that sub-command processing can call. Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- common/command.c | 14

[U-Boot] [PATCH] mpc83xx: add h/w flash protection to board configs (was Re: erase and saveenv stop working after using fw_setenv)

On Tue, 16 Sep 2008 11:04:50 +0200 Wolfgang Denk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The problem is that the MPC8323ERDB board has flash chips that > support hardware flash protection (locking), but the board config > file does not select the CFG_FLASH_PROTECTION option. Therefore > U-Bo

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC] exposing finding a command for subcommands

Dear Kumar Gala, In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > How about something like this for exposing the command table code for > subcommands. I'll follow this up with an example of usage based on the > bootm subcommand patch Looks good to me. Just a question: > -cmd_tbl_t *find_cmd (const c

Re: [U-Boot] PrimeCell Peripherals

Hi, >>how well does U-Boot support ARM's PrimeCell peripherals? What do u mean by support. I use U-booot as The Primary Bootloader on arm926ej-s based Board. By Default U-boot supports few Primecell peripherals drivers like PL0x1 UART. I developed few others my self, like pl18x mmc, rtc, gp

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC] exposing finding a command for subcommands

Here's an example of how we sould use this. Obviously the code after the if (cmd) would change. - k diff --git a/common/cmd_bootm.c b/common/cmd_bootm.c index 3a20ad2..64e7571 100644 --- a/common/cmd_bootm.c +++ b/common/cmd_bootm.c @@ -377,10 +377,23 @@ static int bootm_load_os(image_info_t os,

[U-Boot] [RFC] exposing finding a command for subcommands

How about something like this for exposing the command table code for subcommands. I'll follow this up with an example of usage based on the bootm subcommand patch - k A --- common/command.c | 14 ++ include/command.h |7 +++ 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 4 deletions

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] 440spe MQ initialization

Yuriy/Stefan- This is AMCC confirmation about configuration. Regards, Olga Buchonina AMCC PowerPC Applications Engineering -Original Message- From: Stefan Roese [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2008 4:43 AM To: Yuri Tikhonov Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de; Prodyut Haz

[U-Boot] [RFC][PATCH v3] bootm: Add sub commands

* Use explicit command name matches - k --- common/cmd_bootm.c | 150 +- include/image.h| 20 - lib_ppc/bootm.c| 262 ++-- 3 files changed, 338 insertions(+), 94 deletions(-) diff --git a/common/cmd_boot

[U-Boot] PrimeCell Peripherals

Hello all, the board I'm porting U-Boot on, has several peripheral devices, which are, according to datasheet, are based on PrimeCell PLxx blocks (for example, vector interrupt controller is PL190 based; GPIOs are based on PL061 block and so on). I understand that PrimeCells are IP cores, which bu

Re: [U-Boot] U-Boot on ARM9

Hello. Thank you for your quick response. 2008/9/22 Hebbar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: [skip] > Generally bootloader doesnt use IRQ for running. But if u need to use > IRQ/FIQ u need to setup stacks for the Same. Right, because U-Boot is basically needed to initialize hardware and prepaare it to launc

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC][PATCH v2] bootm: Add sub commands

Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Kumar Gala, > > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: >> This version: >> * cleans ups issues pointed out by Jerry >> * adds a state machine to the command processing >> * adds bd_t and cmdline process on linux for ppc > > Thanks a lot. > > I'm still missing the p

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC][PATCH v2] bootm: Add sub commands

Dear Kumar Gala, In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > This version: > * cleans ups issues pointed out by Jerry > * adds a state machine to the command processing > * adds bd_t and cmdline process on linux for ppc Thanks a lot. I'm still missing the possibility to use longer sub-command na

Re: [U-Boot] stability USB memory sticks for the common OHCI USB layer.

Hello Stelian, Thanks for the logging. This is useful info. > usb_control_msg: request: 0x1, requesttype: 0x23, value 0x14 index 0x1 length > 0x0 > New Device 1 > usb_control_msg: request: 0x6, requesttype: 0x80, value 0x100 index 0x0 > length 0x40 > ERROR: USB-error: DEVICENOTRESPONDING: Devi

[U-Boot] MPC8555CDS broken on TOT (commit 8fd4166c, ELDK 4.2)

Hello, TOT U-Boot (commit 8fd4166c, compiled with ELDK 4.2) for the MPC8555CDS target is broken with the following symptoms: [flash the 8fd4166c image and reset the board] U-Boot 2008.10-rc2-00018-g8fd4166 (Sep 23 2008 - 10:23:59) CPU: 8555E, Version: 1.1, (0x80790011) Core: E500, Version:

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] 440spe MQ initialization

On Tuesday 23 September 2008, Yuri Tikhonov wrote: > BTW, when I said "recommended by AMCC" in the patch description I > referred to the following information forwarded to me by Wolfgang > Denk on Tue Mar 18 2008: > > --- > Dear Yuri, > > here is some additional (and hopefully helpful) information

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] 440spe MQ initialization

Hello, BTW, when I said "recommended by AMCC" in the patch description I referred to the following information forwarded to me by Wolfgang Denk on Tue Mar 18 2008: --- Dear Yuri, here is some additional (and hopefully helpful) information from AMCC regarding the observed hangs on the katma

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] 440spe MQ initialization

Hi Yuri, On Tuesday 23 September 2008, Yuri Tikhonov wrote: > Set the MQ Read Passing & MCIF Cycle limits to the recommended by AMCC > values. This fixes the occasional 440SPe hard locking issues when the > 440SPe's dedicated DMA engines are used (e.g. by the h/w accelerated RAID > driver). > >

[U-Boot] [PATCH] 440spe MQ initialization

Set the MQ Read Passing & MCIF Cycle limits to the recommended by AMCC values. This fixes the occasional 440SPe hard locking issues when the 440SPe's dedicated DMA engines are used (e.g. by the h/w accelerated RAID driver). Previously the appropriate initialization had been made in Linux, by th

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] pci: Divided pci code of the powerpc

On Tuesday 23 September 2008, Andy Fleming wrote: > >>> I did a simple check. > >>> > >>> Only powerpc and i386 and sh seem to use PCI. > >>> If powerpc does not have a problem, would you commit it? > >> > >> Do I have your "go" (or at least no veto) to apply this patch? > > If some of that code is

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] pci: Divided pci code of the powerpc

On Monday 22 September 2008, Andrew Dyer wrote: > >> I did a simple check. > >> > >> Only powerpc and i386 and sh seem to use PCI. > >> If powerpc does not have a problem, would you commit it? > > > > Do I have your "go" (or at least no veto) to apply this patch? > > (forgot to reply all on this, a