Dear All,
Are there anyone or projects for u-boot on marvell littleton debug board?
it's based PXA310, the same as zylonite.
Thanks!
Ricky
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Ulf Samuelsson wrote:
ons 2009-01-07 klockan 21:56 +0100 skrev Jean-Christophe
PLAGNIOL-VILLARD:
Hi,
The AT91 arch use a at45 driver design to be show as a parallel flash
but it's a spi flash.
Haavard add a new spi flash framework which support the dataflash
so
I am making usb driver for omap1510 on uboot. When I pluged in the USB port
to PC. It found COM6 (a virtual com port). But When I open the COM6 on
hyper-terminal, it says Cannot open
The following traces are from the Bus Hound
Device Phase Data
On Wednesday 07 January 2009 14:40:30 Ulf Samuelsson wrote:
tis 2009-01-06 klockan 14:48 -0800 skrev Brad Bozarth:
Hmm... looking in the datasheet I have, it says:
Flexible Erase Options
– Page Erase (512 Bytes)
– Block Erase (4 Kbytes)
– Sector Erase (64 Kbytes)
– Chip Erase (32
Hello Andy,
Except it's apparently not fine. The code is reporting that it is reading
0x as the value of the PHY identifier. That value is found by
reading registers 2 and 3 of the PHY. If the code is reporting that the
value is 0x, then you have a series of possible culprits:
On Thursday 08 January 2009 03:21:24 Haavard Skinnemoen wrote:
Ulf Samuelsson wrote:
6) Support partitions for
bootstrap
environemnt
u-boot
kernel
filesystem
in the boot dataflash.
additional dataflash should have other partitions.
We should add a
I agree with Haavard
The whole storage concept is really not working
when storage becomes larger than the SDRAM.
How do you download an 128 MB image over the network
to a machine with 64 MB SDRAM. - Major pain...
You need to be able to TFTP to flash directly
if you want to have an
On 06:04 Thu 08 Jan , Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Thursday 08 January 2009 03:21:24 Haavard Skinnemoen wrote:
Ulf Samuelsson wrote:
6) Support partitions for
bootstrap
environemnt
u-boot
kernel
filesystem
in the boot dataflash.
additional dataflash
Hello,
I am working on the freescale M5271EVB board on the 2009.01-rc1 u-boot
baseline.
I was able to boot ok, but found out that the baud rate that comes out
is half of what is specified in the board config file
(e.g. 57600 instead of 115200) I've tried changing baud rates, but it
always
Hi,
I'm wondering what the best way is to handle bad environment blocks in NAND.
According to the spec of our supplier a delivered component is considered to be
OK if less than 2% of the blocks are not bad.
This means that for our products we need to take into account that worst case
2% of the
My understanding is that u-boot already support bad block for the environment
config. When reading or writing the config from/to the nand, u-boot skip bad
block. However, you need to reserve some spare blocks in nand for environment
config. This is done in u-boot-nand.lds:
/* Align to next
Hi,
I am new to U-Boot.. I am currently looking for a u-Boot compatible
with the Aspeed AST2050 chip.
The Aspeed AST2050 is a silicon chip based on the ARM 926EJ.
I have seen it working from a solution provided by a firmware vendor but I
would like to know if there is one
On 11:56 Thu 08 Jan , Audet, Jean-Michel wrote:
Hi,
I am new to U-Boot.. I am currently looking for a u-Boot
compatible with the Aspeed AST2050 chip.
The Aspeed AST2050 is a silicon chip based on the ARM 926EJ.
Not in the mainline but we support other arm926ejs as the
Hi all,
I want to install u-boot on the xupv2p board embedding a ppc405 processor.
I have some questions before doing this:
1. Which configuration do I have to use:
make ml300_config or
make xupv2p_config
2. Do I have to change the ~/u-boot/board/xilinx/ml300/xparameters.h file
in
Hi,
I think bad blocks are less likely to happen near the first block, which
is guaranteed to be good. It may be possible to find NAND chip that
guarantee more blocks but I have not encountered one myself.
U-boot has the code to skip bad block when reading environment. As
Sylvain said, you
The following changes since commit f85cd46918241842546e5021d0b88db2be50a048:
Wolfgang Denk (1):
Merge branch 'master' of git://git.denx.de/u-boot-mpc85xx
are available in the git repository at:
git://www.denx.de/git/u-boot-blackfin.git master
Mike Frysinger (5):
Blackfin: set
On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 07:19:29AM -0800, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote:
Is there a solution for this? (obviously I am not considering the
situation for a single system, where I just would relocate the
environment block; this concerns a production situation).
E.g. it would be nice if U-Boot could
Hi,
I'm in the process of bringing up a custom board featuring AMCC's
440EPx processor. I'm using the uboot-2008-10 source tree and
sequoia board for my starting configuration, also using ELDK v4.2.
for cross-compiler tools and such.
Although my board initializes and completes its memory tests
On Thursday 08 January 2009 15:33:09 Brad Bozarth wrote:
Linux - yes, it's supported. Uboot - I have another patch that allows
power of 2 mode (I believe it's on the blackfin portal).
istr said patch was against the Blackfin eeprom/spi driver and not the new
common layer ? ive been largely
Hi all,
I want to install u-boot on the xupv2p board embedding a ppc405 processor.
I have some questions before doing this:
1. Which configuration do I have to use:
make ml300_config or
make xupv2p_config
2. Do I have to change the ~/u-boot/board/xilinx/ml300/xparameters.h file
in
Hi,
Is there any support for eMMC in uboot level?
Regards,
Naveen
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Hi Jonathan,
On Thursday 08 January 2009, Jonathan Barrow wrote:
I'm in the process of bringing up a custom board featuring AMCC's
440EPx processor. I'm using the uboot-2008-10 source tree and
sequoia board for my starting configuration, also using ELDK v4.2.
for cross-compiler tools and
is there a spi/mmc driver floating around ? i googled but didnt find anything
useful. there is a driver for the Blackfin port, but it's highly Blackfin-
specific, and i know there's a Linux driver, but i dont know how well it'd
translate to u-boot ...
hopefully someone else has already dug
Scott Wood scottwood at freescale.com writes:
On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 07:19:29AM -0800, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote:
Is there a solution for this? (obviously I am not considering the
situation for a single system, where I just would relocate the
environment block; this concerns a production
Sylvain, Scott,
Thanks for the info.
If the bad env blocks are skipped that at least would solve my problem.
I hope that it does not break fw_setenv.
Storing the pointer in oob in block 0 is an interesting idea. I need to think
about the impact on that one a little bit more.
With large blocks
Hi Xavier,
Hi all,
First of all - do not send your messages twice.
I want to install u-boot on the xupv2p board embedding a ppc405 processor.
I have some questions before doing this:
1. Which configuration do I have to use:
make ml300_config or
make xupv2p_config
If is
26 matches
Mail list logo
