[U-Boot] [PATCH]

2009-06-01 Thread Kim, Heung Jun
Dear Jean, I made new patch about L2 cane enable/disable function. The related thread is here. http://www.mail-archive.com/u-boot@lists.denx.de/msg14744.html I fixed title issue apart header. Thanks to read :) Best Regards, riverful = omap3 L2 cache enable/disable function moved from

[U-Boot] [PATCH] omap3 L2-cache enable/disable function to omap3 dependent code

2009-06-01 Thread Kim, Heung Jun
Dear Jean, I miss mail title sorry. :) = Dear Jean, I made new patch about L2 cane enable/disable function. The related thread is here. http://www.mail-archive.com/u-boot@lists.denx.de/msg14744.html I fixed title issue apart header. Thanks to read :) Best Regards, riverful

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V2] board support patch for phyCORE-MPC5200B-tiny

2009-06-01 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Jon Smirl, In message 9e4733910905311659u5e7c77a2ld80b526149c0d...@mail.gmail.com you wrote: Are you sure? This is pessimal choice. EEPROM is slow and unreliable. After you decided for a solution, then please remove the (then) dead code. Phytec ships default with the boards

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V2] board support patch for phyCORE-MPC5200B-tiny

2009-06-01 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Jon Smirl, In message 9e4733910905311805r2682b953tb87a4b97847b8...@mail.gmail.com you wrote: On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 6:11 PM, Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote: +#define CONFIG_SYS_LOAD_ADDR 0x10 /* default load address */ This used to be a reasonable choice with Linux 2.4.4; it

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ARM Cortex A8: Move OMAP3 specific reset handler to OMAP3 code

2009-06-01 Thread Kim, Heung Jun
Dear Jean Dirk, Jean's opinion seems that file naming func naming must match for soruce maintaining, definitely I agree with that. Moreover it's a very first time to implement the new arm_cortexa8 code for u-boot source. So, the matching works is needed. On the other hand, Dirk's opinion

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ARM Cortex A8: Move OMAP3 specific reset handler to OMAP3 code

2009-06-01 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Riverful, In message b64afca20906010014r321bd3fas3539d97f6667e...@mail.gmail.com you wrote: Jean's opinion seems that file naming func naming must match for soruce maintaining, definitely I agree with that. I do not agree. Yes, they _should_ match. That means we should try to

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH]

2009-06-01 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Kim, Heung Jun, In message b64afca20905312308r1dbe50d8pc3d04e8450483...@mail.gmail.com you wrote: I made new patch about L2 cane enable/disable function. The related thread is here. http://www.mail-archive.com/u-boot@lists.denx.de/msg14744.html I fixed title issue apart header.

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] omap3 L2-cache enable/disable function to omap3 dependent code

2009-06-01 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Kim, Heung Jun, In message b64afca20905312312w578a4699q1939b50d573b0...@mail.gmail.com you wrote: Dear Jean, I miss mail title sorry. :) = Dear Jean, I made new patch about L2 cane enable/disable function. The related thread is here.

[U-Boot] uboot under cygwin

2009-06-01 Thread Stas Desyatnlkov
Hi All, My first post here. Sorry if it was asked before and I couldn't find it. I need to build uboot for my own board based on 5121ads design from Freescale. My board is different from the reference as it has no CPLD, so I have to change a few things in the uboot code. I use Windows based

Re: [U-Boot] [U-BOot] new cpu(Ingenic), new board(PI)

2009-06-01 Thread xiangfu
Wolfgang Denk wrote: Dear xiangfu, In message 4a21e74f.6080...@gmail.com you wrote: there is two branch in my git[2]. [xiangfu] this one , I try to merge with the upstream. [u-boot] is the upstream. I use git diff u-boot..xiangfu ~/pi_project.patch to generate the patch[1]. No.

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC/PATCH] jffs2/mtdparts: Fix problem with usage from JFFS2 and MTDPARTS together

2009-06-01 Thread Renaud barbier
Wolfgang Denk wrote: Dear Stefan Roese, In message 1242468262-25814-1-git-send-email...@denx.de you wrote: Currently using JFFS2 with MTDPARTS enabled doesn't work. This is because mtdparts_init() is available in both files, cmd_mtdparts.c and cmd_jffs2.c. Please note that in the

[U-Boot] [PATCH] The omap3 L2 cache enable/disable function to omap3 dependent code

2009-06-01 Thread Kim, Heung Jun
CC: Dirk Behme dirk.be...@googlemail.com Signed-off-by: HeungJun, Kim riverful@samsung.com --- The L2 cache enable/disable function in the cpu/arm_cortexa8/cpu.c moved to cpu/arm_cortexa8/omap3/cache.c. This patches fixes the First issue in the following

[U-Boot] potential Uboot Ping problem

2009-06-01 Thread Steven Zedeck
Hi, It appears the ping in UBOOT is broken. The ping works fine if you have a network connection. But if the network connection is disconnected the ping hangs the system. There is no response to Control-C either. I have to power cycle the proto to get back to a UBOOT prompt. Is this a known issue

Re: [U-Boot] potential Uboot Ping problem

2009-06-01 Thread Premi, Sanjeev
-Original Message- From: u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de [mailto:u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de] On Behalf Of Steven Zedeck Sent: Monday, June 01, 2009 8:05 PM To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Subject: [U-Boot] potential Uboot Ping problem Hi, It appears the ping in UBOOT is broken. The

Re: [U-Boot] potential Uboot Ping problem

2009-06-01 Thread Steven Zedeck
I guess thats good news. I looked inside the cmd_ping code a bit. I bet there's a while loop somewhere that is waiting for something and may not have a timeout loop. Any ideas? Thanks, Steve Premi, Sanjeev wrote: -Original Message- From: u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ARM Cortex A8: Move OMAP3 specific reset handler to OMAP3 code

2009-06-01 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
On 17:56 Sun 31 May , Dirk Behme wrote: Dear Jean-Christophe, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: On 09:30 Sat 30 May , Dirk Behme wrote: Reset is SoC specific and not ARM Cortex A8 generic. Move it from generic code to OMAP3 SoC specific file. CC: Kim, Heung Jun

[U-Boot] [PATCH V3] board support patch for phyCORE-MPC5200B-tiny

2009-06-01 Thread Jon Smirl
Add support for the Phytec phyCORE-MPC5200B-tiny. Code originally from Pengutronix.de. Added MAKEALL and MAINTAINER entry per last posting. Signed-off-by: Jon Smirl jonsm...@gmail.com --- MAINTAINERS |4 MAKEALL |1 Makefile

Re: [U-Boot] USB gadget interface from cdc branch into mainline

2009-06-01 Thread Remy Bohmer
Hello Ragha, 2009/5/30 Ragha raghavendra...@gmail.com: Hello, The gadget interface at cdc branch [1] sounds good. Any plans for merging it into mainline? Yeah, I planned it for the next release. Kind Regards, Remy Regards, -Ragha [1]

Re: [U-Boot] uboot under cygwin

2009-06-01 Thread Kim Phillips
On Mon, 1 Jun 2009 10:37:11 +0300 Stas Desyatnlkov s...@tech-mer.com wrote: gcc -g -Wall -idirafter /cygdrive/d/temp/Freescale/u-boot-2008.10/include -idirafter /cygdrive/d/temp/Freescale/u-boot-2008.10/include2 -idirafter /cygdrive/d/temp/Fr EXT_BASE=0xFFF0 -DUSE_HOSTCC -O -c -o

Re: [U-Boot] Large Block USB Flash Drive Problem

2009-06-01 Thread Remy Bohmer
Hello, 2009/5/28 Barnes, Clifton A. cabar...@indesign-llc.com:        I have been trying out loading the Linux kernel using a USB flash drive in the u-boot-2009.06-rc2 release and ran into a problem with one of my flash drives.  This particular drive has a block size of 2048 while the other

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] The omap3 L2 cache enable/disable function to omap3 dependent code

2009-06-01 Thread Kim Phillips
On Tue, 2 Jun 2009 01:08:53 +0900 Kim, Heung Jun river...@gmail.com wrote: Dear Kim Philips, Thanks to review help. 3. while making backreferences by pointing to messages in the list archive is cool, they don't stand the test of time - the URL may one day cease to exist. So it is

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 3/6] mpc83xx: USB: Reorganized its support

2009-06-01 Thread Remy Bohmer
Hello Vivek, 2009/5/25 Vivek Mahajan vivek.maha...@freescale.com: The following patch reorganizes/reworks the USB support for mpc83xx as under:-  * Moves the 83xx USB clock init from drivers/usb/host/ehci-fsl.c to    cpu/mpx83xx/cpu_init.c  * Board specific usb_phy_type is read from the

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 4/6] mpc85xx: USB: Add support

2009-06-01 Thread Remy Bohmer
Hello Vivek, 2009/5/21 Vivek Mahajan vivek.maha...@freescale.com: The following patch adds 85xx-specific USB support and also revamps Copyright in immap_85xx.h Signed-off-by: Vivek Mahajan vivek.maha...@freescale.com Sorry, but this patch does not apply to U-boot-usb next branch, can you

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 6/6] mpc85xx: 8536ds: Add USB related CONFIGs

2009-06-01 Thread Remy Bohmer
Hello Vivek, 2009/5/25 Vivek Mahajan vivek.maha...@freescale.com: This patch adds CONFIGs for enabling USB in mpc8536ds and also adds usb_phy_type in CONFIG_EXTRA_ENV_SETTINGS. Also revamps its Copyright. Signed-off-by: Vivek Mahajan vivek.maha...@freescale.com --- v2 change: usb_phy_type

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/3] ZOOM2 detect the version of the zoom2 board at runtime.

2009-06-01 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
On 09:58 Fri 29 May , Tom Rix wrote: There are currently 3 versions of the zoom2 board. The production board, that is currently being released. The beta board, similar in form to the production board but not released. The alpha board, a set of PCBs with a very limited circulation. GPIO

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] The omap3 L2 cache enable/disable function to omap3 dependent code

2009-06-01 Thread Dirk Behme
Kim Phillips wrote: On Mon, 1 Jun 2009 19:14:49 +0900 Kim, Heung Jun river...@gmail.com wrote: CC: Dirk Behme dirk.be...@googlemail.com Signed-off-by: HeungJun, Kim riverful@samsung.com --- The L2 cache enable/disable function in the cpu/arm_cortexa8/cpu.c moved to

Re: [U-Boot] [U-BOOT] nand merge problem

2009-06-01 Thread Scott Wood
On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 04:09:35PM +0800, xiangfu wrote: static void jz_hwcontrol(struct mtd_info *mtd, int cmd, unsigned int ctrl) { struct nand_chip *this = (struct nand_chip *)(mtd-priv); unsigned int nandaddr = (unsigned int)this-IO_ADDR_W; if (ctrl NAND_CTRL_CHANGE)

[U-Boot] [PATCH] Adds WATCHDOG_RESET() function call to lib_m68k dtimer_interrupt.

2009-06-01 Thread Tsi-Chung Liew
From: Richard Retanubun richardretanu...@ruggedcom.com Ported from lib_ppc/interrupts.c, this adds the ability for the coldfire system timer to auto-reset the watchdog when dtimer_interrupts is called. Signed-off-by: Richard Retanubun richardretanu...@ruggedcom.com --- lib_m68k/time.c | 13

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/3] MX31: Add NAND SPL for i.MX31.

2009-06-01 Thread Scott Wood
On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 09:54:56AM +0200, Magnus Lilja wrote: 2009/5/29 Scott Wood scottw...@freescale.com: The bad block location is typically different (offset 0 rather than 5) with large page flash. I think that's because of the non-standard imlementation of large page support in the

[U-Boot] [PATCH] Compier warning cleanup

2009-06-01 Thread TsiChung Liew
From: Richard Retanubun richardretanu...@ruggedcom.com Follow up to git commit: 19b5b533ccd522abeb501d510750693c35e20456 Cleanup on compiler warnings on unused variables now that bd-bi_enetaddr is no longer used. Signed-off-by: Richard Retanubun richardretanu...@ruggedcom.com ---

[U-Boot] [PATCH] Coldfire M5271: Activate u-boot system timer interrupt.

2009-06-01 Thread TsiChung Liew
From: Richard Retanubun richardretanu...@ruggedcom.com This patch assigns the u-boot system timer interrupt to interrupt level 3, priority 6. Without this patch the interrupt will be a level 0, priority 0, which disables it and cause u-boot functions that relies on the timer (e.g. sleep command)

[U-Boot] [PATCH] Standardize the use of MCFFEC_TOUT_LOOP as a udelay(1) loop counter.

2009-06-01 Thread TsiChung Liew
From: Richard Retanubun richardretanu...@ruggedcom.com Signed-off-by: Richard Retanubun richardretanu...@ruggedcom.com --- drivers/net/mcfmii.c |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/mcfmii.c b/drivers/net/mcfmii.c index 4f1c0a0..4acc29e 100644 ---

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] The omap3 L2 cache enable/disable function to omap3 dependent code

2009-06-01 Thread Kim Phillips
On Mon, 01 Jun 2009 18:46:21 +0200 Dirk Behme dirk.be...@googlemail.com wrote: 2. your signoff is in the correct location, however the commit message is not. It belongs above the line with the '---'. 3. while making backreferences by pointing to messages in the list archive is cool, they

[U-Boot] [PATCH] The omap3 L2 cache enable/disable function to omap3 dependent code

2009-06-01 Thread Kim, Heung Jun
CC: Dirk Behme dirk.be...@googlemail.com Signed-off-by: HeungJun, Kim riverful@samsung.com --- The L2 cache enable/disable function in the cpu/arm_cortexa8/cpu.c moved to cpu/arm_cortexa8/omap3/cache.c. This patches fixes the First issue in the following

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] The omap3 L2 cache enable/disable function to omap3 dependent code

2009-06-01 Thread Kim, Heung Jun
Dear Wolfgang, I fixed the deficiencies like the following : http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-June/053534.html And, I use git-format-patch. One more thing, I wanted to tell that this is the exact time in the unmatch-naming case, by the following thread. :

[U-Boot] REJECT: Too many recipients to the message

2009-06-01 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Hi, there is an increasing number of postings with loong lists of recipients (10 addresses and more); usually several of these are regular and active users of this mailing list so this is actually redundant; for the remaining addresses question is if these people really need

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V3] board support patch for phyCORE-MPC5200B-tiny

2009-06-01 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Jon Smirl, In message 20090601150640.12311.66146.st...@terra you wrote: Add support for the Phytec phyCORE-MPC5200B-tiny. Code originally from Pengutronix.de. Added MAKEALL and MAINTAINER entry per last posting. Signed-off-by: Jon Smirl jonsm...@gmail.com ... +pcm030_config \

[U-Boot] [PATCH] Enable display CPU-Info for at91sam9261

2009-06-01 Thread Remy Bohmer
Signed-off-by: Remy Bohmer li...@bohmer.net --- include/configs/at91sam9261ek.h |2 ++ 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/configs/at91sam9261ek.h b/include/configs/at91sam9261ek.h index fdaa71c..9a50347 100644 --- a/include/configs/at91sam9261ek.h +++

Re: [U-Boot] REJECT: Too many recipients to the message

2009-06-01 Thread Scott Wood
Jerry Van Baren wrote: That is actually a MailMan feature. If you go to your personal configuration page, you will find the last option to be... Avoid duplicate copies of messages? When you are listed explicitly in

[U-Boot] [PATCH V4] board support patch for phyCORE-MPC5200B-tiny

2009-06-01 Thread Jon Smirl
Add support for the Phytec phyCORE-MPC5200B-tiny. Code originally from Pengutronix.de. Added MAKEALL and MAINTAINER entry per last posting. Signed-off-by: Jon Smirl jonsm...@gmail.com --- MAINTAINERS |4 MAKEALL |1 Makefile

[U-Boot] UBIFS will not build for Davinci (2006.06-rc2)

2009-06-01 Thread kevin_springle
Hi, I am trying to add UBIFS support to the davinci_dvevm board (ARCH=arm, CPU=arm926ejs, BOARD=dvevm, VENDOR=davinci, SOC=davinci) configuration. However, I encountered a number of issues that lead me to belive that UBIFS support is limited to PowerPC architectures. Has UBIFS support been

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V2] Add display cpuinfo for Atmel at91 arm926ejs based cores

2009-06-01 Thread Stelian Pop
Hi Rémy, I do have a few comments, see below: On Mon, Jun 01, 2009 at 08:21:42PM +0200, Remy Bohmer wrote: V2 reworked comments from Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD [...] +COBJS-$(CONFIG_DISPLAY_CPUINFO) +=cpuinfo.o missing space ? + switch ((cidr AT91_CIDR_EPROC) 5) { + /*

Re: [U-Boot] REJECT: Too many recipients to the message

2009-06-01 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Scott Wood, In message 4a242071.1010...@freescale.com you wrote: there is an increasing number of postings with loong lists of recipients (10 addresses and more); usually several of these are regular and active users of this mailing list so this is actually

Re: [U-Boot] REJECT: Too many recipients to the message

2009-06-01 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Scott Wood, In message 4a242313.3060...@freescale.com you wrote: I already have that set to no. It's not the list e-mail that isn't making it, but the direct CC e-mail. It only happens some of the time. To the best of my knowledge both messages get sent, but it seems some servers drop

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Enable display CPU-Info for at91sam9261

2009-06-01 Thread Stelian Pop
On Mon, Jun 01, 2009 at 08:21:43PM +0200, Remy Bohmer wrote: Signed-off-by: Remy Bohmer li...@bohmer.net --- include/configs/at91sam9261ek.h |2 ++ 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/configs/at91sam9261ek.h b/include/configs/at91sam9261ek.h index

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/3] MX31: Add NAND SPL for i.MX31.

2009-06-01 Thread Magnus Lilja
Hi 2009/6/1 Scott Wood scottw...@freescale.com: On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 09:54:56AM +0200, Magnus Lilja wrote: 2009/5/29 Scott Wood scottw...@freescale.com: The bad block location is typically different (offset 0 rather than 5) with large page flash. I think that's because of the

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/3] MX31: Add NAND SPL for i.MX31.

2009-06-01 Thread Magnus Lilja
Hi 2009/5/30 Magnus Lilja lilja.mag...@gmail.com: 2009/5/29 Scott Wood scottw...@freescale.com: On Sun, May 03, 2009 at 09:56:57PM +0200, Magnus Lilja wrote: +static void mx31_nand_page_address(unsigned int page_address) +{ +     unsigned int page_count; + +     writew(0x00,

Re: [U-Boot] REJECT: Too many recipients to the message

2009-06-01 Thread T Ziomek
On Mon, Jun 01, 2009 at 10:00:12PM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote: Dear Scott Wood, In message 4a242071.1010...@freescale.com you wrote: there is an increasing number of postings with loong lists of recipients (10 addresses and more); usually several of these are regular

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V2] Add display cpuinfo for Atmel at91 arm926ejs based cores

2009-06-01 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
On 21:59 Mon 01 Jun , Stelian Pop wrote: Hi Rémy, I do have a few comments, see below: On Mon, Jun 01, 2009 at 08:21:42PM +0200, Remy Bohmer wrote: V2 reworked comments from Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD [...] +COBJS-$(CONFIG_DISPLAY_CPUINFO) +=cpuinfo.o missing space ?

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Enable display CPU-Info for at91sam9261

2009-06-01 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
On 22:03 Mon 01 Jun , Stelian Pop wrote: On Mon, Jun 01, 2009 at 08:21:43PM +0200, Remy Bohmer wrote: Signed-off-by: Remy Bohmer li...@bohmer.net --- include/configs/at91sam9261ek.h |2 ++ 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git

Re: [U-Boot] REJECT: Too many recipients to the message

2009-06-01 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear T Ziomek, In message 20090601203258.gg8...@email.mot.com you wrote: Yes, but how one's MUA / mail client handles them may *not* be identi- cal. Quite a few people configure their MUA to prioritize messages based on whether they are on the To: list, CC:, BCC:, or none of the above

Re: [U-Boot] REJECT: Too many recipients to the message

2009-06-01 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear T Ziomek, In message 20090601210846.gj8...@email.mot.com you wrote: How about reconfiguring the list software instead? I see no reason for that yet. I see no reason, at least none articulated as of yet, for the current configuration. The current configurations is (1) the

Re: [U-Boot] potential Uboot Ping problem

2009-06-01 Thread Peter Tyser
Hi Steven, On Mon, 2009-06-01 at 08:03 -0700, Steven Zedeck wrote: I guess thats good news. I looked inside the cmd_ping code a bit. I bet there's a while loop somewhere that is waiting for something and may not have a timeout loop. Any ideas? Thanks, Steve Please don't top post, it makes

Re: [U-Boot] REJECT: Too many recipients to the message

2009-06-01 Thread Scott Wood
Wolfgang Denk wrote: Dear T Ziomek, In message 20090601210846.gj8...@email.mot.com you wrote: How about reconfiguring the list software instead? I see no reason for that yet. I see no reason, at least none articulated as of yet, for the current configuration. The current configurations

[U-Boot] [PATCH] Blackfin: add jtagconsole helper script

2009-06-01 Thread Mike Frysinger
This script is similar to the netconsole script, but instead works with the JTAG console device driver that exists on Blackfin parts. Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org --- tools/jtagconsole | 39 +++ 1 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 0

Re: [U-Boot] REJECT: Too many recipients to the message

2009-06-01 Thread T Ziomek
On Tue, Jun 02, 2009 at 12:00:21AM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote: Dear T Ziomek, In message 20090601210846.gj8...@email.mot.com you wrote: How about reconfiguring the list software instead? I see no reason for that yet. I see no reason, at least none articulated as of yet,

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Canyonlands SATA harddisk driver

2009-06-01 Thread Kazuaki Ichinohe
Hello Kuribayashi-san, Please make sure I'm not talking about register definition structures. They're harmless, and no need to be cleaned up. The definition of the register of DMA is the following. However, the structure is used a little for the usage in which DMA is disabled. struct dmareg {

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Canyonlands SATA harddisk driver

2009-06-01 Thread Shinya Kuribayashi
Kazuaki Ichinohe wrote: But, other local, private, resource management structures are encouraged to be shrinked/optimized, as it's just waste of ROM space. Originally U-boot of PowerPC is not importance for the size because the size is large. I will point out and object about you. As

Re: [U-Boot] potential Uboot Ping problem

2009-06-01 Thread Steven Zedeck
Peter Tyser wrote: Hi Steven, On Mon, 2009-06-01 at 08:03 -0700, Steven Zedeck wrote: I guess thats good news. I looked inside the cmd_ping code a bit. I bet there's a while loop somewhere that is waiting for something and may not have a timeout loop. Any ideas? Thanks, Steve

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Canyonlands SATA harddisk driver

2009-06-01 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
On 18:07 Fri 29 May , Shinya Kuribayashi wrote: Kazuaki Ichinohe wrote: DMA function was scheduled to be developed as my schedule. However, the development of the DMA function is discontinued once now. The structure of the register that controls DMA has not been used any longer. I

Re: [U-Boot] USB gadget interface from cdc branch into mainline

2009-06-01 Thread Raghu
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 10:38 AM, Remy Bohmer li...@bohmer.net wrote: Yeah, I planned it for the next release. Is it going to be u-boot-2009.06? I am interested in supporting OMAP3 musb drivers with this new interface. Thanks, -Raghu ___ U-Boot mailing

Re: [U-Boot] [U-BOOT] nand merge problem

2009-06-01 Thread xiangfu
Thanks Scott, it's work. :-) Scott Wood wrote: Try something like this instead: static void jz_hwcontrol(struct mtd_info *mtd, int cmd, unsigned int ctrl) { struct nand_chip *this = mtd-priv; unsigned long nandaddr = (unsigned long)this-IO_ADDR_W; if (ctrl

Re: [U-Boot] REJECT: Too many recipients to the message

2009-06-01 Thread HeungJun, Kim
Dear Wolfgang everyone, It happened ”Too many recipients to the message”, and I'm very sorry that my messages's many CC cause this event. Before that, I didn't find the recipients # limits on the u-boot mailinglist guidelines. So, I just send the messages like other my situation. If It's

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC/PATCH] jffs2/mtdparts: Fix problem with usage from JFFS2 and MTDPARTS together

2009-06-01 Thread Stefan Roese
On Monday 01 June 2009 10:59:16 Renaud barbier wrote: Renaud, you reported this problem on 05-04-2009 [mtdparts and JFFS2]. Could you please take a look at my patch. Does this work for you? Or what else is missing? This works for me. Great, thanks for checking. Best regards, Stefan

[U-Boot] [PATCH v1] arm: Kirkwood: Basic SOCs support

2009-06-01 Thread Prafulla Wadaskar
Kirkwood family controllers are highly integrated SOCs based on Feroceon-88FR131/Sheeva-88SV131/arm926ejs cpu core. SOC versions supported:- 1) 88F6281-A0 define CONFIG_KW88F6281_A0 2) 88F6192-A0 define CONFIG_KW88F6192_A0 Other supported features:- 1) get_random_hex() fucntion 2)

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v1] arm: Kirkwood: Basic SOCs support

2009-06-01 Thread Prafulla Wadaskar
Hi Jean I have added macros and put some comments in kw_config_adr_windows() for better readability Also I have given references from datasheet too. This was the only feedback from the last patch. I Hope this patch is clean to apply So please kindly review and apply the same Regards.. Prafulla

Re: [U-Boot] UBIFS will not build for Davinci (2006.06-rc2)

2009-06-01 Thread Stefan Roese
On Monday 01 June 2009 20:58:39 kevin_sprin...@telus.net wrote: I am trying to add UBIFS support to the davinci_dvevm board (ARCH=arm, CPU=arm926ejs, BOARD=dvevm, VENDOR=davinci, SOC=davinci) configuration. However, I encountered a number of issues that lead me to belive that UBIFS support is

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 2/5] spi: Add Marvell Kirkwood SPI driver

2009-06-01 Thread Prafulla Wadaskar
This patch adds a SPI driver for the Marvell Kirkwood SoC's. Signed-off-by: Prafulla Wadaskar prafu...@marvell.com --- Change log: v2: White space in debug print removed drivers/spi/Makefile|1 + drivers/spi/kirkwood_spi.c | 185 +++

[U-Boot] pci bus scan in u-boot-1.0.2

2009-06-01 Thread xiaoguizi007
Hello, I'm tring using pci function of u-boot-1.0.2. But while the programm run into function pci_hose_scan_bus() in /drivers/pci.c, it looks like go to dead and will never run. So, I assert some debug infomation, and then get the problem,maybe it is pci_hose_##rw##_config_##size()