[U-Boot] [PATCH v3] arm926ejs: 8-byte align stack to avoid LDRD/STRD problems

2009-10-05 Thread Simon Kagstrom
U-boot for Marvell Kirkwood boards no longer work after the EABI changes introduced in commit f772acf8a584067033eff1e231fcd1fb3a00d3d9. This turns out to be caused by a stack alignment issue. The armv5te instructions ldrd/strd instructions require 8-byte alignment to work properly (otherwise undefi

[U-Boot] [PATCH] ppc4xx: Add PPC405EX(r) Rev D support

2009-10-05 Thread Stefan Roese
Unfortunately some Rev D PPC405EX/405EXr PVR's are identical with older 405EX(r) parts. Here a list: 0x12911475 - 405EX Rev D with Security *and* 405EX Rev A/B witout Sec 0x12911473 - 405EX Rev D without Security *and* 405EXr Rev A/B with Sec Since there are only a few older parts in the field, t

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] arm926ejs: 16-byte align stack to avoid LDRD/STRD problems

2009-10-05 Thread Prafulla Wadaskar
> -Original Message- > From: Simon Kagstrom [mailto:simon.kagst...@netinsight.net] > Sent: Monday, October 05, 2009 8:23 PM > To: Stefan Roese > Cc: Andrew Dyer; Wolfgang Denk; u-boot@lists.denx.de; > Prafulla Wadaskar; Tom Rix > Subject: [PATCH v2] arm926ejs: 16-byte align stack to av

[U-Boot] [PATCH] Fix error in mpc512x System Clock control constants for USB1 & USB2

2009-10-05 Thread Martha Stan
From: root Signed-off-by: root --- include/asm-ppc/immap_512x.h |4 ++-- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/asm-ppc/immap_512x.h b/include/asm-ppc/immap_512x.h index 79cdd80..e553bbe 100644 --- a/include/asm-ppc/immap_512x.h +++ b/include/asm-ppc/immap_51

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3] TI: OMAP3: Overo Tobi ethernet support

2009-10-05 Thread Paulraj, Sandeep
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] TI: OMAP3: Overo Tobi ethernet support > > On Oct 5, 2009, at 8:56 AM, Steve Sakoman wrote: > > > On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 2:14 PM, Olof Johansson > > wrote: > >> Add setup for ethernet on Tobi, allowing kernel/ramdisk to be loaded > >> over tftp. > >> > >> This also

Re: [U-Boot] [patch] dm355evm NAND support

2009-10-05 Thread David Brownell
On Monday 05 October 2009, Paulraj, Sandeep wrote: > > > I guess that happened after I prepared the patch but before I sent > > it in.  I'll look; there were some differences still.  Notably to > > store the environment in the otherwise-unused block zero, > > That is because most users who have us

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] relocation: Do not relocate NULL pointers.

2009-10-05 Thread Peter Tyser
Hi Jocke, > > > There are a few change which would further improve relocation that Jocke > > > and I want to get merged. Whether these improvements occur in this > > > release or the next is not a big deal to me. > > > 1. Fix relocation of NULL pointers. > > > eg the following code would print th

[U-Boot] [PATCH 0/2] Make sure 85xx bss doesn't start at 0x0

2009-10-05 Thread Peter Tyser
It looks like the 85xx platform is the only one which has boards with the bss at 0x0. It uses a slightly different linker script format which puts the bss after the reset vector, which is 0xfffc + 4 for a number of boards. Other platforms don't put their bss in a similar location, so they don

[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] 85xx: Ensure BSS segment doesn't start at address 0x0

2009-10-05 Thread Peter Tyser
When U-Boot is relocated from flash to RAM pointers are modified accordingly. However, pointers initialzed with NULL values should not be modified so that they maintain their intended NULL value. The address of the BSS segment must be modified during relocation which means that it must not have a

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] 85xx: Preprocess link scripts

2009-10-05 Thread Peter Tyser
This allows for fancy conditionals and inclusions Signed-off-by: Peter Tyser --- cpu/mpc85xx/config.mk |2 +- cpu/mpc85xx/{u-boot-nand.lds => u-boot-nand.lds.S} |0 cpu/mpc85xx/{u-boot.lds => u-boot.lds.S} |0 3 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1

[U-Boot] [PATCH] Zoom2 Fix serial gpmc setup

2009-10-05 Thread Tom Rix
The offset to the chip select is incorrect. The change 187af954cf7958c24efcf0fd62289bbdb4f1f24e, omap3: embedd gpmc_cs into gpmc config struct introduced a problem with the serial gpmc setup. This patch reverts the chip select to its previous value. The symptoms of this problem are that the Zo

[U-Boot] Zoom2 Fix serial setup

2009-10-05 Thread Tom Rix
This patch is against u-boot-ti/master I run tested this on Zoom2. Tom ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] arm926ejs: 16-byte align stack to avoid LDRD/STRD problems

2009-10-05 Thread Måns Rullgård
Simon Kagstrom writes: > U-boot for Marvell Kirkwood boards no longer work after the EABI changes > introduced in commit f772acf8a584067033eff1e231fcd1fb3a00d3d9. This > turns out to be caused by a stack alignment issue. The armv5te > instructions ldrd/strd instructions require 8-byte alignment t

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] mpc512x: fix fixed_sdram() init code.

2009-10-05 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Martha, In message <200910051244291.sm06...@[206.180.163.89]> you wrote: > Thank You for fixing this ... If this is an ACK, then please send a formal Acked-by: message. Thanks. Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Offi

Re: [U-Boot] Pull request - net

2009-10-05 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Ben Warren, In message <4ac99ff1.3040...@gmail.com> you wrote: > Wolfgang, > > The following changes since commit 311c19ccb5783a1de71fd5042eeadfbe9688f597: > Wolfgang Denk (1): > Merge branch 'master' of git://git.denx.de/u-boot-ppc4xx > > are available in the git repository at: >

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] relocation: Do not relocate NULL pointers.

2009-10-05 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Peter Tyser, In message <1254773254.24664.657.ca...@localhost.localdomain> you wrote: > > > 32 bit alignment of the BSS segment might not be sufficient. Be > > careful! > > I've tried a few ways to ensure the BSS isn't at address 0x0, and they > all seem to have their shortcomings. I'm cur

Re: [U-Boot] [patch] dm355evm NAND support

2009-10-05 Thread Paulraj, Sandeep
> > > > I have already ack-ed Sandeep's patch that contains this > > > fix for the warning. Please check with him. > > > > That is correct, I did not add it to my tree because you ACK'ed > > this patch only after I sent a pull request. So obviously I cannot > > add a patch that has been ACK'ed

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/3 v3] Add bb_miiphy_init call before any ethernet bring-up code.

2009-10-05 Thread Luigi Mantellini
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 10:18 PM, Ben Warren wrote: ... >> >> The board specifc code will be contained into the hook .init filed >> into the bb_mii_buses vector. >> >> Do you have a better solution? >> >> > > In each case, you put the bb_miiphy_init() right before eth_initialize(). >  One of the fi

Re: [U-Boot] [patch] dm355evm NAND support

2009-10-05 Thread David Brownell
On Monday 05 October 2009, Paulraj, Sandeep wrote: > > I have already ack-ed Sandeep's patch that contains this > > fix for the warning. Please check with him. > > That is correct, I did not add it to my tree because you ACK'ed > this patch only after I sent a pull request. So obviously I cannot

Re: [U-Boot] [patch] dm355evm NAND support

2009-10-05 Thread David Brownell
On Monday 05 October 2009, Tom wrote: > In general it is better to break patches that do multiple things into > multiple patches. When you resubmit, please break this patch into its > logical parts : > 1. NAND > 2. Environment Hmm, my *original* patch necessarily disabled both because there was

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/3 v3] Add bb_miiphy_init call before any ethernet bring-up code.

2009-10-05 Thread Ben Warren
Luigi Mantellini wrote: > The lib_[arch]/board.c code calls the bb_miiphy_init that will do just 2 > things: > > 1) Relocate the bb_mii_buses[i].* hooks (.init, .mdio_active, .delay, ...) > 2) Call the board bb_mii_buses[i].init (board specific code). > > The board specifc code will be contained i

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] relocation: Do not relocate NULL pointers.

2009-10-05 Thread Peter Tyser
Hi Wolfgang, > > My "fix" to the linker script was to change: > > __bss_start = .; > > into: > > __bss_start = . | 4; > > > > ie, a big hack, but it did work:) I'll take a peek at a more proper > > link script workaround. > > 32 bit alignment of the BSS segment might not be sufficient. Be > car

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/3 v3] Add bb_miiphy_init call before any ethernet bring-up code.

2009-10-05 Thread Luigi Mantellini
The lib_[arch]/board.c code calls the bb_miiphy_init that will do just 2 things: 1) Relocate the bb_mii_buses[i].* hooks (.init, .mdio_active, .delay, ...) 2) Call the board bb_mii_buses[i].init (board specific code). The board specifc code will be contained into the hook .init filed into the bb_

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3 v3] Bit-banged MII driver with multi-bus support.

2009-10-05 Thread Ben Warren
Hi Luigi, Luigi Mantellini wrote: > Hi Ben, > > thank for your review. Find my inline comments. > > Thanks and best regards, > > luigi > > On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 8:27 AM, Ben Warren wrote: > >> Hi Luigi, >> >> Luigi 'Comio' Mantellini wrote: >> >>> From: Luigi 'Comio' Mantellini >>> >>>

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3 v3] Bit-banged MII driver with multi-bus support.

2009-10-05 Thread Luigi Mantellini
Hi Ben, thank for your review. Find my inline comments. Thanks and best regards, luigi On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 8:27 AM, Ben Warren wrote: > Hi Luigi, > > Luigi 'Comio' Mantellini wrote: >> >> From: Luigi 'Comio' Mantellini >> >> > > Please add some descriptive information here.  This is a big

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] arm926ejs: 16-byte align stack to avoid LDRD/STRD problems

2009-10-05 Thread Tom
Simon Kagstrom wrote: > U-boot for Marvell Kirkwood boards no longer work after the EABI changes > introduced in commit f772acf8a584067033eff1e231fcd1fb3a00d3d9. This > turns out to be caused by a stack alignment issue. The armv5te > instructions ldrd/strd instructions require 8-byte alignment to w

[U-Boot] [PATCH] PPC4xx: Denali core: Fix incorrect DDR row bits

2009-10-05 Thread Mike Nuss
The SPD detection code for the Denali memory controller used on some ppc4xx processors incorrectly encodes DDR0_42. With certain memory configurations, this can cause the bootwrapper to incorrectly calculate the installed memory size, because the number of row bits is wrong. This patch fixes that e

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] mpc512x: fix fixed_sdram() init code.

2009-10-05 Thread m stan
Thank You for fixing this ... also .. "marx" was in pop3 properties - thanks for catching it. Your powers of observation are very keen ! -Martha -Original Message- From: Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de Sent 10/4/2009 4:56:08 PM To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Cc: Martha M Stan mm...@silicontkx.com

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH-ARM 1/4, v2] Clean-up of cpu_arm920t and cpu_arm920t_s3c24x0 code

2009-10-05 Thread Abdoulaye Walsimou Gaye
kevin.morf...@fearnside-systems.co.uk a écrit : > Here are links to the patches and notes on their states: > - [U-boot] [PATCH-ARM] CONFIG_SYS_HZ change for cpu/arm920t/s3c24x0 boards: > http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-September/thread.html, > JP said it looked OK but needed testing

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] arm926ejs: 16-byte align stack to avoid LDRD/STRD problems

2009-10-05 Thread Dieter Kiermaier
Am Montag 05 Oktober 2009 16:53:24 schrieb Simon Kagstrom: Hi all, congratulation and many thanks for the catch :) Dieter > U-boot for Marvell Kirkwood boards no longer work after the EABI changes > introduced in commit f772acf8a584067033eff1e231fcd1fb3a00d3d9. This > turns out to be caused by

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2] arm926ejs: 16-byte align stack to avoid LDRD/STRD problems

2009-10-05 Thread Simon Kagstrom
U-boot for Marvell Kirkwood boards no longer work after the EABI changes introduced in commit f772acf8a584067033eff1e231fcd1fb3a00d3d9. This turns out to be caused by a stack alignment issue. The armv5te instructions ldrd/strd instructions require 8-byte alignment to work properly (otherwise undefi

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] arm926ejs: 16-byte align stack to avoid LDRD/STRD problems

2009-10-05 Thread Simon Kagstrom
On Mon, 5 Oct 2009 09:30:54 -0500 Andrew Dyer wrote: > >        sub     r0, r0, #(CONFIG_STACKSIZE_IRQ+CONFIG_STACKSIZE_FIQ) > >  #endif > > -       sub     sp, r0, #12             /* leave 3 words for abort-stack     > > */ > > +       sub     sp, r0, #16             /* leave 3 words for abort-s

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] arm926ejs: 16-byte align stack to avoid LDRD/STRD problems

2009-10-05 Thread Andrew Dyer
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 8:23 AM, Simon Kagstrom wrote: > U-boot for Marvell Kirkwood boards no longer work after the EABI changes > introduced in commit f772acf8a584067033eff1e231fcd1fb3a00d3d9. This > turns out to be caused by a stack alignment issue. The armv5te > instructions ldrd/strd instructi

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] arm926ejs: 16-byte align stack to avoid LDRD/STRD problems

2009-10-05 Thread Stefan Roese
On Monday 05 October 2009 16:30:54 Andrew Dyer wrote: > > diff --git a/cpu/arm926ejs/start.S b/cpu/arm926ejs/start.S > > index 8043322..ca520eb 100644 > > --- a/cpu/arm926ejs/start.S > > +++ b/cpu/arm926ejs/start.S > > @@ -171,7 +171,8 @@ stack_setup: > > #ifdef CONFIG_USE_IRQ > >sub r

Re: [U-Boot] Preserving frame buffer memory between uboot and Linux

2009-10-05 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Steven Zedeck, In message <25751508.p...@talk.nabble.com> you wrote: > [Full quote deleted] It was probably not necessary to quote my full message, including signature and everything. Please see http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html > I don't understand how to set this variable

Re: [U-Boot] Preserving frame buffer memory between uboot and Linux

2009-10-05 Thread Steven Zedeck
wd wrote: > > Dear Steven Zedeck, > > In message <25722060.p...@talk.nabble.com> you wrote: >> >> We have a situation when we want to display an image towards the end of >> Uboot's execution, before we boot Linux. I have that already. >> >> However, my issue is that while Linux boots it mall

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3] TI: OMAP3: Overo Tobi ethernet support

2009-10-05 Thread Olof Johansson
On Oct 5, 2009, at 8:56 AM, Steve Sakoman wrote: > On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 2:14 PM, Olof Johansson > wrote: >> Add setup for ethernet on Tobi, allowing kernel/ramdisk to be loaded >> over tftp. >> >> This also refactors the smc911x driver to allow for detecting when >> the >> chip is missing

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3] TI: OMAP3: Overo Tobi ethernet support

2009-10-05 Thread Steve Sakoman
On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 2:14 PM, Olof Johansson wrote: > Add setup for ethernet on Tobi, allowing kernel/ramdisk to be loaded > over tftp. > > This also refactors the smc911x driver to allow for detecting when the > chip is missing. I.e. the detect_chip() function is called earlier and > will abor

[U-Boot] [PATCH] arm926ejs: 16-byte align stack to avoid LDRD/STRD problems

2009-10-05 Thread Simon Kagstrom
U-boot for Marvell Kirkwood boards no longer work after the EABI changes introduced in commit f772acf8a584067033eff1e231fcd1fb3a00d3d9. This turns out to be caused by a stack alignment issue. The armv5te instructions ldrd/strd instructions require 8-byte alignment to work properly (otherwise undefi

Re: [U-Boot] [patch] dm355evm NAND support

2009-10-05 Thread Paulraj, Sandeep
> > David Brownell wrote: > > This is the second half of my DM355 EVM support patches, adding > > the NAND support now that the 4-bit ECC is merged: > > > > - Kick in NAND support, enabling > > * the DaVinci NAND driver > > * its 4-bit ECC support > > * MTD_DEVICE (newish, should

[U-Boot] u-Boot itself gets erased on fw_setenv

2009-10-05 Thread Rahanesh
Hi All, I am using fw_printenv to set few environment variables from Linux. I am able to see all the environment variables using fw_printenv. But when i type the command fw_printenv i get the following message first "*Read error on /dev/mtd1: Success*" then u-boot environment variables are p

Re: [U-Boot] [patch] dm355evm NAND support

2009-10-05 Thread Tom
David Brownell wrote: > This is the second half of my DM355 EVM support patches, adding > the NAND support now that the 4-bit ECC is merged: > > - Kick in NAND support, enabling > * the DaVinci NAND driver > * its 4-bit ECC support > * MTD_DEVICE (newish, should be automatic!) >

[U-Boot] [PATCH v1]ppc/P1_P2_RDB: On-chip ROM boot

2009-10-05 Thread Dipen Dudhat
On Chip BootROM support for P1 and P2 series RDB platforms. This patch is derived from latest On Chip BootROM support on MPC8536DS by Mingkai Hu. Signed-off-by: Dipen Dudhat --- - Applies to http://git.denx.de/u-boot.git MAKEALL |2 ++ Makefile

[U-Boot] [PATCH v1] ppc/P1_P2_RDB: NAND Boot Support

2009-10-05 Thread Dipen Dudhat
NAND Boot support for P1 and P2 series RDB platforms. This patch is derived from latest NAND Boot support on MPC8536DS by Mingkai Hu. Signed-off-by: Dipen Dudhat --- - Applies to http://git.denx.de/u-boot.git MAKEALL|1 + Makefile

Re: [U-Boot] build failure on denx top

2009-10-05 Thread Aggrwal Poonam-B10812
> -Original Message- > From: Po-Yu Chuang [mailto:ratbert.chu...@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 11:15 AM > To: Aggrwal Poonam-B10812 > Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de > Subject: Re: [U-Boot] build failure on denx top > > Dear Aggrwal Poonam-B10812, > > 2009/9/30 Aggrwal Poo

[U-Boot] [PATCH v3] ppc/85xx: PIO Support for FSL eSDHC Controller Driver

2009-10-05 Thread Dipen Dudhat
On some Freescale SoC Internal DMA of eSDHC controller has bug. So PIO Mode has been introduced to do data transfer using CPU. Signed-off-by: Dipen Dudhat --- Changes from v2: - Integated wolfgang and Bin Meng's Comments. drivers/mmc/fsl_esdhc.c | 87 +++

Re: [U-Boot] Problem with NetConsole

2009-10-05 Thread alex889
Thanks Wolfgang ! that helped, the last question i have is: I want the NetConsole to listen for incoming messages for 2 sec, I've tried using NetSetTimeout, but it seems to not work Alex wd wrote: > > Dear alex889, > > please do not top post / full quote. PLease make sure to read > http://www

[U-Boot] [PATCH] Generic udelay() with watchdog support

2009-10-05 Thread Ingo van Lil
According to the PPC reference implementation the udelay() function is responsible for resetting the watchdog timer as frequently as needed. Most other architectures do not meet that requirement, so long-running operations might result in a watchdog reset. This patch adds a generic udelay() functi

Re: [U-Boot] Die id?

2009-10-05 Thread Tuma
On Monday 05 October 2009 12:25:41 Dirk Behme wrote: > Tuma wrote: > > Hi, All! > > I have a question about serial No. and Die ID. > > I've found this info: > > http://www.mail-archive.com/u-boot@lists.denx.de/msg10042.html > > > > Can you tell me please what is Die ID? > > I need some serial No, w

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v0 1/2] u-boot-2009.08 NET: Move MDIO regs out of TSEC Space

2009-10-05 Thread Kumar Gopalpet-B05799
>-Original Message- >From: Wolfgang Denk [mailto:w...@denx.de] >Sent: Friday, October 02, 2009 12:00 AM >To: Kumar Gopalpet-B05799 >Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de >Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v0 1/2] u-boot-2009.08 NET: Move >MDIO regs out of TSEC Space > >Dear Sandeep Gopalpet, > >In messa

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] ppc/85xx: PIO Support for FSL eSDHC Controller Driver

2009-10-05 Thread Dudhat Dipen-B09055
-Original Message- From: Bin Meng [mailto:bmeng...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, October 05, 2009 1:59 PM To: Dudhat Dipen-B09055 Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] ppc/85xx: PIO Support for FSL eSDHC Controller Driver Hi Dipen, On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 12:48 PM, Dudhat D

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v0 2/2] u-boot-2009.08 NET: Base support for etsec2.0

2009-10-05 Thread Kumar Gopalpet-B05799
>-Original Message- >From: Kumar Gala [mailto:ga...@kernel.crashing.org] >Sent: Thursday, October 01, 2009 7:13 PM >To: Kumar Gopalpet-B05799 >Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de >Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v0 2/2] u-boot-2009.08 NET: Base >support for etsec2.0 > > >On Sep 24, 2009, at 7:07 AM,

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] ppc/85xx: PIO Support for FSL eSDHC Controller Driver

2009-10-05 Thread Bin Meng
Hi Dipen, On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 12:48 PM, Dudhat Dipen-B09055 wrote: > > Hi Bin, > > We can know the block transfer complete using IRQSTAT(Transfer > Complete). > But reading & writing in PIO mode takes time for byte by byte transfers > and there is no way to poll that transfer, that's why I hav

Re: [U-Boot] AT91RM9200 deprecated Ethernet driver

2009-10-05 Thread Jens Scharsig
Hi Ben, >> > I don't have any familiarity with either of these, but a cursory > inspection shows me that most AT91 chips use the MACB driver. I don't > see much in similarities between the MACB driver and the 9200 driver, so > don't know if joining them makes sense. I don't remember any dis

Re: [U-Boot] Die id?

2009-10-05 Thread Dirk Behme
Tuma wrote: > Hi, All! > I have a question about serial No. and Die ID. > I've found this info: > http://www.mail-archive.com/u-boot@lists.denx.de/msg10042.html > > Can you tell me please what is Die ID? > I need some serial No, which could be used as unique ID of device built on > OMAP3 processo

[U-Boot] Die id?

2009-10-05 Thread Tuma
Hi, All! I have a question about serial No. and Die ID. I've found this info: http://www.mail-archive.com/u-boot@lists.denx.de/msg10042.html Can you tell me please what is Die ID? I need some serial No, which could be used as unique ID of device built on OMAP3 processor. Is this possible to reali

Re: [U-Boot] Starting compressed win CE kernel

2009-10-05 Thread A. Geisreiter
Dear Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD, I tried to use the unzip command of U-Boot, to unzip a Win CE Kernel. If I have a file size of roughly 10MB it takes 1 minute to uncompress the kernel. This is too long for my application. I use an PXA270 CPU with 64MB SDRAM. How can I make the unzip command

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Add information about return values of xxx_eth_register() in documentation

2009-10-05 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Monday 05 October 2009 03:09:23 Ben Warren wrote: > Ben Warren wrote: > > As discussed on mailing list, <0 indicates failure, >=0 indicates number > > of interfaces found. > > > > Also added blurb about private data > > I'm going to go ahead and put this in the net repo. If you don't like > it

Re: [U-Boot] AT91RM9200 deprecated Ethernet driver

2009-10-05 Thread Ben Warren
Hi Jens, Jens Scharsig wrote: > Hello, > > at current git all AT91RM9200 based boards have the "Ethernet driver is > deprecated" warning. > I have read anywhere, there are plans to join the AT91 and the 9200 driver. > Is there someone work on this or will AT91RM9200 driver ported in soon. > >

[U-Boot] Pull request - net

2009-10-05 Thread Ben Warren
Wolfgang, The following changes since commit 311c19ccb5783a1de71fd5042eeadfbe9688f597: Wolfgang Denk (1): Merge branch 'master' of git://git.denx.de/u-boot-ppc4xx are available in the git repository at: git://git.denx.de/u-boot-net.git master Ben Warren (2): Convert SMC9 E

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Add information about return values of xxx_eth_register() in documentation

2009-10-05 Thread Ben Warren
Mike, Ben Warren wrote: > As discussed on mailing list, <0 indicates failure, >=0 indicates number > of interfaces found. > > Also added blurb about private data > I'm going to go ahead and put this in the net repo. If you don't like it, let me know and we'll back it out. regards, Ben __

[U-Boot] [PATCH] Add information about return values of xxx_eth_register() in documentation

2009-10-05 Thread Ben Warren
As discussed on mailing list, <0 indicates failure, >=0 indicates number of interfaces found. Also added blurb about private data Signed-off-by: Ben Warren --- doc/README.drivers.eth | 21 + 1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/doc/README.drivers