Re: [U-Boot] Relocation size penalty calculation

2009-10-17 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
Graeme Russ graeme.r...@gmail.com wrote on 17/10/2009 07:17:04: [SNIP] Apologies if this is getting way off-topic for a simple boot loader, but this is information I have gathered from far and wide over the net. I am surprised that there isn't a web site out there on 'How to create a

Re: [U-Boot] Relocation size penalty calculation

2009-10-17 Thread J. William Campbell
Graeme Russ wrote: On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 3:45 AM, J. William Campbell jwilliamcampb...@comcast.net wrote: Joakim Tjernlund wrote: megasnip Apologies if this is getting way off-topic for a simple boot loader, but this is information I have gathered from far and wide over the

Re: [U-Boot] ARM pull request v3

2009-10-17 Thread Paulraj, Sandeep
Sandeep: What's about this? Sent some days ago http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/69770 Tom: We need this in u-boot-arm before sending the pull request to Wolfgang. If we don't get a u-boot-ti pull request, at least we need the two above commits from u-boot-ti in

Re: [U-Boot] ARM pull request v3

2009-10-17 Thread Tom
Dirk Behme wrote: Paulraj, Sandeep wrote: Tom Rix wrote: ... Olof Johansson (3): ... SMC911X: Add chip auto detection This is broken [1] and doesn't work without http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot/u-boot- ti.git;a=commit;h=e7911214d5aee1ba5eb160327d5ff305c9e6ee5a And while last

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] CPU9260 : fix machine ID when using a CPU9G20.

2009-10-17 Thread Tom Rix
Eric Benard wrote: Signed-off-by: Eric Benard e...@eukrea.com --- board/eukrea/cpu9260/cpu9260.c |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/board/eukrea/cpu9260/cpu9260.c b/board/eukrea/cpu9260/cpu9260.c index 0b4f0d4..af8a4a2 100644 ---

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] fix cpuat91 compile warning

2009-10-17 Thread Tom Rix
Eric Benard wrote: main.c: In function 'abortboot': main.c:122: warning: too few arguments for format Signed-off-by: Eric Benard e...@eukrea.com --- include/configs/cpuat91.h |4 ++-- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/configs/cpuat91.h

[U-Boot] Kernel hangs...

2009-10-17 Thread Michael Schmid
Hi! I have the following system: - Board: Artila M-501 with Atmel AT91RM9200 - 16MB Flash - 64MB SDRAM - U-Boot 1.1.2 - Linux: 2.6 I am new to those bootloader and embedded linux things, so I messed up the configuration of u-boot... Then I recovered the Board with new loader, environment and

Re: [U-Boot] Kernel hangs...

2009-10-17 Thread Ben Warren
Hi Michael, On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 1:03 PM, Michael Schmid msch...@gmx.ch wrote: Hi! I have the following system: - Board: Artila M-501 with Atmel AT91RM9200 - 16MB Flash - 64MB SDRAM - U-Boot 1.1.2 - Linux: 2.6 I don't have any experience with this hardware, but it sure looks like a

Re: [U-Boot] Please pull u-boot-ti master v2

2009-10-17 Thread Tom
s-paul...@ti.com wrote: Tom, To the best of my knowledge, the final version of patches for new boards were submitted after the merge window ended but the initial versions were submitted before the merge window ended. Also there are fixes for various compilation warnings. This pull request

Re: [U-Boot] ARM pull request v3

2009-10-17 Thread Tom
Dirk Behme wrote: Paulraj, Sandeep wrote: Tom Rix wrote: ... Olof Johansson (3): ... SMC911X: Add chip auto detection This is broken [1] and doesn't work without http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot/u-boot- ti.git;a=commit;h=e7911214d5aee1ba5eb160327d5ff305c9e6ee5a And while last

Re: [U-Boot] Please pull u-boot-ti master v2

2009-10-17 Thread Paulraj, Sandeep
s-paul...@ti.com wrote: Tom, To the best of my knowledge, the final version of patches for new boards were submitted after the merge window ended but the initial versions were submitted before the merge window ended. Also there are fixes for various compilation warnings. This pull

Re: [U-Boot] Please pull u-boot-ti master v2

2009-10-17 Thread Tom
Paulraj, Sandeep wrote: s-paul...@ti.com wrote: Tom, To the best of my knowledge, the final version of patches for new boards were submitted after the merge window ended but the initial versions were submitted before the merge window ended. Also there are fixes for various compilation

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3] arm926ejs: 8-byte align stack to avoid LDRD/STRD problems

2009-10-17 Thread Tom
Simon Kagstrom wrote: U-boot for Marvell Kirkwood boards no longer work after the EABI changes introduced in commit f772acf8a584067033eff1e231fcd1fb3a00d3d9. This turns out to be caused by a stack alignment issue. The armv5te instructions ldrd/strd instructions require 8-byte alignment to work