Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 13/22] omap4: add clock support

2011-06-21 Thread Aneesh V
Dear Wolfgang, On Tuesday 21 June 2011 11:19 AM, Aneesh V wrote: Dear Wolfgang, On Sunday 15 May 2011 08:51 PM, Aneesh V wrote: [snip ..] +static const u32 clk_modules_hw_auto_essential[] = { + CM_WKUP_GPIO1_CLKCTRL, + CM_L4PER_GPIO2_CLKCTRL, + CM_L4PER_GPIO3_CLKCTRL, +

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 13/22] omap4: add clock support

2011-06-21 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Aneesh V, In message 4e0030f8.6030...@ti.com you wrote: I am finding it difficult to implement this using the struct based approach. I tried the sample code below: struct my_regs_struct { const unsigned int reg1; const unsigned int reg2; const unsigned int reg3;

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 13/22] omap4: add clock support

2011-06-21 Thread Aneesh V
On Tuesday 21 June 2011 12:35 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: Dear Aneesh V, In message4e0030f8.6030...@ti.com you wrote: I am finding it difficult to implement this using the struct based approach. I tried the sample code below: struct my_regs_struct { const unsigned int reg1;

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 13/22] omap4: add clock support

2011-06-21 Thread Aneesh V
On Tuesday 21 June 2011 11:55 AM, Aneesh V wrote: Dear Wolfgang, On Tuesday 21 June 2011 11:19 AM, Aneesh V wrote: Dear Wolfgang, On Sunday 15 May 2011 08:51 PM, Aneesh V wrote: [snip ..] +static const u32 clk_modules_hw_auto_essential[] = { + CM_WKUP_GPIO1_CLKCTRL, +

Re: [U-Boot] da850evm: u-boot does not start without UBL since commit f1d2b313c9eb6808d30c16a9eb5251240452a56c

2011-06-21 Thread Heiko Schocher
Hello Christian, Sorry for the late answer ... Wolfgang Denk wrote: Dear Christian Riesch, In message banlktimhjss_urkzb-q5y7gqzawswe0...@mail.gmail.com you wrote: What is AIS ? I apologize for using that many abbreviations in my mail and not explaining them :-/ AIS is short for

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 13/22] omap4: add clock support

2011-06-21 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Aneesh, In message 4e00447b.9070...@ti.com you wrote: $ gcc main.c main.c:5: error: initializer element is not constant main.c:5: error: (near initialization for ‘arr[0]’) main.c:7: error: initializer element is not constant main.c:7: error: (near initialization for ‘arr[1]’) I have

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 13/22] omap4: add clock support

2011-06-21 Thread Aneesh V
On Tuesday 21 June 2011 01:50 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: Dear Aneesh, In message4e00447b.9070...@ti.com you wrote: $ gcc main.c main.c:5: error: initializer element is not constant main.c:5: error: (near initialization for ‘arr[0]’) main.c:7: error: initializer element is not constant

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 13/22] omap4: add clock support

2011-06-21 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Aneesh V, In message 4e005f9e.8050...@ti.com you wrote: In my function I am using 3 such arrays with quite a few entries in them. Won't it look ugly besides increasing the stack footprint. I don;t see a significant difference whether you declare these arrays inside a function or with

Re: [U-Boot] SPL framework re-design

2011-06-21 Thread Aneesh V
Dear Wolfgang, On Friday 17 June 2011 10:18 PM, Aneesh V wrote: Dear Wolfgang, Here is a crude implementation of the top-down approach you had been suggesting (or my interpretation of it). This is not complete yet and serves only as a material for further discussions on this topic. Here is

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 13/22] omap4: add clock support

2011-06-21 Thread Aneesh V
On Tuesday 21 June 2011 03:52 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: Dear Aneesh V, In message4e005f9e.8050...@ti.com you wrote: In my function I am using 3 such arrays with quite a few entries in them. Won't it look ugly besides increasing the stack footprint. I don;t see a significant difference

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 13/22] omap4: add clock support

2011-06-21 Thread Aneesh V
On Tuesday 21 June 2011 02:38 PM, Aneesh V wrote: On Tuesday 21 June 2011 01:50 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: Dear Aneesh, In message4e00447b.9070...@ti.com you wrote: $ gcc main.c main.c:5: error: initializer element is not constant main.c:5: error: (near initialization for ‘arr[0]’)

[U-Boot] [PATCH] omap3: Include array definition only when it is used

2011-06-21 Thread Sanjeev Premi
The array of strings corresponding to cpu revision is used only when CONFIG_DISPLAY_CPUINFO is selected - in the function print_cpuinfo(). Enclose definition of this array in #ifdef...#endif for the same. Signed-off-by: Sanjeev Premi pr...@ti.com --- arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap3/sys_info.c |3

Re: [U-Boot] at91rm9200 linking problem (?)

2011-06-21 Thread Marcin Górski
To compile it I also had to add 3 macros to the configuration file: CONFIG_SYS_INIT_RAM_ADDR, Why this? I guess you mean CONFIG_SYS_SDRAM_BASE here. Yes, my mistake. CONFIG_SYS_INIT_RAM_SIZE and CONFIG_SYS_INIT_SP_ADDR. Can this cause this problem? SYS_INIT_SP_ADDR is required, if

Re: [U-Boot] at91rm9200 linking problem (?)

2011-06-21 Thread Andreas Bießmann
Dear Marcin Górski, Am 21.06.2011 15:19, schrieb Marcin Górski: CONFIG_SYS_INIT_RAM_SIZE and CONFIG_SYS_INIT_SP_ADDR. Can this cause this problem? SYS_INIT_SP_ADDR is required, if you see 'DRAM: ...' output it is likely to be a correct value for you. I guess your gd_t parameters for SDRAM

[U-Boot] System Administrator

2011-06-21 Thread Harry Price
Your Mailbox Has Exceeded It Storage Limit As Set By Your Administrator, To Re-Validate - Click Here:https://spreadsheets.google.com/spreadsheet/viewform?formkey=dGVUdXdjdXRUenJ4cE9PZW5PN01Damc6MQ System Administrator. ___ U-Boot mailing list

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Don't do an undefined 32-bit shift on a 32-bit value for a long (4 byte) itest.l command.

2011-06-21 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 19:10, Joshua Radel wrote: Without this fix, the following statement erroneously echoed true (at least on the microblaze architecture): if itest.l 0 == 1; then echo true; else echo false; fi (using itest.w or itest.b worked as expected even without this change) the

Re: [U-Boot] [GIT pull] Please pull u-boot-mpc85xx

2011-06-21 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Kumar Gala, In message alpine.lfd.2.00.1106091556160.27...@right.am.freescale.net you wrote: Merge branch 'master' of git://git.denx.de/u-boot-arm (2011-06-08 23:29:04 +0200) are available in the git repository at: git://git.denx.de/u-boot-mpc85xx master Timur Tabi (1):

[U-Boot] Pull request: u-boot-arm/master

2011-06-21 Thread Albert ARIBAUD
Hi Wolfgang, The following changes since commit 29b83d983392fcb5378b915ee2112bb48b8c05be: powerpc/p1022ds: set the clock-frequency prop only if the clock is enabled (2011-06-09 15:53:38 -0500) are available in the git repository at: git://git.denx.de/u-boot-arm.git master Aneesh V (6):

Re: [U-Boot] PCIe Configuration on MPC8544 processor

2011-06-21 Thread António Silva
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 9:27 PM, Swarthout Edward L-SWARTHOU swart...@freescale.com wrote: From: António Silva I am trying to activate a PCIe link between two MPC8544 processor's on a custom board. One processor is configured as Root Complex (cfg_host_agt[0:2] = '111') and the other

Re: [U-Boot] PCIe Configuration on MPC8544 processor

2011-06-21 Thread Swarthout Edward L-SWARTHOU
From: António Silva I am trying to activate a PCIe link between two MPC8544 processor's on a custom board. One processor is configured as Root Complex (cfg_host_agt[0:2] = '111') and the other processor as endpoint (cfg_host_agt[0:2] = '101'). I've done this with many different

[U-Boot] [PATCH v3 0/5] Add Highbank platform

2011-06-21 Thread Rob Herring
From: Rob Herring rob.herr...@calxeda.com This series enables non-PCI AHCI controllers and adds support for Calxeda Highbank platform which uses the AHCI changes. I've dropped my SDHCI changes as now there are 2 versions of common SDHCI code on the list and that needs sorting out. Wolfgang,

[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/5] arm: add __ilog2 function

2011-06-21 Thread Rob Herring
From: Rob Herring rob.herr...@calxeda.com Add __ilog2 function for ARM. Needed for ahci.c Signed-off-by: Rob Herring rob.herr...@calxeda.com Cc: Albert ARIBAUD albert.arib...@free.fr --- arch/arm/include/asm/bitops.h |9 + 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/5] ARM: Add Calxeda Highbank platform

2011-06-21 Thread Rob Herring
From: Rob Herring rob.herr...@calxeda.com Add basic support for Calxeda Highbank platform. Only minimal support to boot is included. Signed-off-by: Jason Hobbs jason.ho...@calxeda.com Signed-off-by: Rob Herring rob.herr...@calxeda.com Cc: Albert ARIBAUD albert.arib...@free.fr ---

[U-Boot] [PATCH 4/5] scsi/ahci: add support for non-PCI controllers

2011-06-21 Thread Rob Herring
From: Rob Herring rob.herr...@calxeda.com Add support for AHCI controllers that are not PCI based. Signed-off-by: Rob Herring rob.herr...@calxeda.com Cc: Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de --- common/cmd_scsi.c|6 +++- drivers/block/ahci.c | 70

[U-Boot] [PATCH 3/5] scsi/ahci: ata id little endian fix

2011-06-21 Thread Rob Herring
From: Rob Herring rob.herr...@calxeda.com The ata id string always needs swapping, not just on BE machines. Signed-off-by: Rob Herring rob.herr...@calxeda.com Cc: Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de --- drivers/block/ahci.c |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git

[U-Boot] [PATCH 5/5] ARM: highbank: Add AHCI support

2011-06-21 Thread Rob Herring
From: Rob Herring rob.herr...@calxeda.com This enables the AHCI driver on highbank platforms. Signed-off-by: Rob Herring rob.herr...@calxeda.com Cc: Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de Cc: Albert ARIBAUD albert.arib...@free.fr --- board/highbank/highbank.c |9 + include/configs/highbank.h |

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/5] ARM: Add Calxeda Highbank platform

2011-06-21 Thread Fabio Estevam
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 6:33 PM, Rob Herring robherri...@gmail.com wrote: From: Rob Herring rob.herr...@calxeda.com Add basic support for Calxeda Highbank platform. Only minimal support to boot is included. Signed-off-by: Jason Hobbs jason.ho...@calxeda.com Signed-off-by: Rob Herring

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/5] ARM: Add Calxeda Highbank platform

2011-06-21 Thread Rob Herring
On 06/21/2011 05:22 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote: On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 6:33 PM, Rob Herring robherri...@gmail.com wrote: From: Rob Herring rob.herr...@calxeda.com Add basic support for Calxeda Highbank platform. Only minimal support to boot is included. Signed-off-by: Jason Hobbs

[U-Boot] how to understand uboot is 32bit program even it is in the 64bit mips

2011-06-21 Thread hacklu
I have a 64bit cnMips borad.In the mail list archives,it says uboot is 32bit,even in the 64bit cpu. but how to understand that? I have a guess,is the 64bit cpu support a 32bit-mode,then when does it switch to 64bit-mode to load 64-bit linux? btw,I have an other question,according to see

Re: [U-Boot] IMX51 EVK Splash Screen

2011-06-21 Thread Thomas Besemer
Please constrain your emails to the email list; I do not like direct comment or direct email. Stefano has fixed much of the IPU/Splash Screen stuff. A good deal of that is in current U-Boot tree, last I saw. I am now back on OMAP, so really don't have comment on this. Stefanfo might, but just

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] sh: Clean up rsk7264 board settings

2011-06-21 Thread Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
Applied to next branch. Thanks. Nobuhiro 2011/6/9 Phil Edworthy phil.edwor...@renesas.com: Adjusted default settings so that we can boot zImages and uImages. Removed unused settings, use default commands and where possible calculate all other settings. Signed-off-by: Phil Edworthy

Re: [U-Boot] u-boot for x86

2011-06-21 Thread Graeme Russ
Hi Raleigh, On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 12:44 PM, Raleigh Boulware r_boulw...@hotmail.com wrote: I am looking at the source code for the sc520 and can not figure out which board directory to look in. Which of the board plat form has the sc520? The only board which currently builds for the sc520 is

Re: [U-Boot] how to understand uboot is 32bit program even it is in the 64bit mips

2011-06-21 Thread Aaron Williams
We have dealt with this in our release of U-Boot since we only support 64-bit Linux. We use the n32 ABI with U-Boot and set it up to use a TLB entry to map U-Boot into a 32-bit addressable area. We have some special memcpy type routines that can handle the 64-bit addressing. All of our I/O