[U-Boot] CAN framework in U-Boot

2013-05-01 Thread Bhupesh SHARMA
Hi Wolfgang G. and list, I was looking to do some basic tests on a C_CAN module inside our SOC at u-boot level, till the Linux OS is up and working to test basic CAN features. I couldn't figure out if CAN framework is supported in u-boot and would really appreciate if someone can help me out

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/45] Verified boot implementation based on FIT

2013-05-01 Thread Simon Glass
Hi Tom, On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 11:51 AM, Simon Glass s...@chromium.org wrote: Hi Tom, On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 7:50 AM, Tom Rini tr...@ti.com wrote: On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 06:44:53PM -0500, Kim Phillips wrote: On Sat, 20 Apr 2013 16:03:20 -0700 Simon Glass s...@chromium.org wrote: On

Re: [U-Boot] Pull request - microblaze

2013-05-01 Thread Michal Simek
On 04/30/2013 05:44 PM, Tom Rini wrote: On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 11:26:44AM +0200, Michal Simek wrote: Hi Tom, please pull these microblaze changes to your tree. 2 of that patches was reviewed by you. Thanks, Michal The following changes since commit

Re: [U-Boot] Pull request - zynq

2013-05-01 Thread Michal Simek
On 04/30/2013 04:50 PM, Tom Rini wrote: On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 11:49:33AM +0200, Michal Simek wrote: Hi Tom and Albert, please pull this patchset related to arm zynq to your tree. I haven't got any ACK for gem and platform changes but the whole patchset was reviewed by Tom. Also not all

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Fix references to the documentation files

2013-05-01 Thread Stefano Babic
On 30/04/2013 23:15, Anatolij Gustschin wrote: Many boot image configuration files refer to the appropriate documentation file, but these references contain typos in the directory and file name. Fix them. Also fix reference to doc/README.SPL file. Signed-off-by: Anatolij Gustschin

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/7] FPGA cleanup + zynq support

2013-05-01 Thread Michal Simek
Fpga code is pretty old and none has tried to clean it up. My attempt is related to new code I want to push to mainline which is add support for checking bitstream and if bitstream is valid for the selected device. For this I need to do cleanup code and move code from cmd_fpga.c to fpga.c in

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/7] fpga: Clean coding style

2013-05-01 Thread Michal Simek
No functional changes. Signed-off-by: Michal Simek michal.si...@xilinx.com --- Changes in v2: - Fix compilation warnings drivers/fpga/fpga.c | 216 1 file changed, 98 insertions(+), 118 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/fpga/fpga.c

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 2/7] fpga: Fix debug message compilation error

2013-05-01 Thread Michal Simek
CONFIG_FPGA in past was a bitfield where bits were use for vendor identification. This fix should be the part of this commit: Improve configuration of FPGA subsystem (sha1: 0133502e39ff89b67c26cb4015e0e7e8d9571184) Signed-off-by: Michal Simek michal.si...@xilinx.com --- Changes in v2: - Fix

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 3/7] cmd: fpga: Clean coding style

2013-05-01 Thread Michal Simek
No functional changes. Signed-off-by: Michal Simek michal.si...@xilinx.com --- Changes in v2: None I had to shorten some debug messages and divide them to two parts to pass checkpatch. --- common/cmd_fpga.c | 213 +++--- 1 file changed, 107

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 7/7] fpga: Check device name against bitstream name

2013-05-01 Thread Michal Simek
Ensure that wrong bitstream won't be loaded to current device. Signed-off-by: Michal Simek michal.si...@xilinx.com --- Changes in v2: - New patch in this series drivers/fpga/fpga.c | 20 drivers/fpga/xilinx.c | 2 ++ include/xilinx.h | 1 + include/zynqpl.h |

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 4/7] cmd: fpga: Move fpga_loadbitstream to fpga.c

2013-05-01 Thread Michal Simek
In bitstream decoding you can directly check device which you want to load and in fpga.c are fpga_validate and fpga_dev_info functions which should be used for it. Signed-off-by: Michal Simek michal.si...@xilinx.com --- Changes in v2: None common/cmd_fpga.c | 94

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 6/7] fpga: zynq: Add support for loading bitstream

2013-05-01 Thread Michal Simek
Devcfg device requires to load bitstream in binary format. But u-boot also has an option for loading bitstream in bit format. Let's handle both cases by zynqpl driver. Also add suport for loading partial bitstreams. The first driver version was done by: Joe Hershberger joe.hershber...@ni.com

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 5/7] cmd: fpga: Do not include net.h

2013-05-01 Thread Michal Simek
There is no reason to include net.h header in fpga code. Signed-off-by: Michal Simek michal.si...@xilinx.com --- Changes in v2: None common/cmd_fpga.c | 3 --- 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/common/cmd_fpga.c b/common/cmd_fpga.c index aa14ceb..5e1d037 100644 ---

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2] gpio: Add support for microblaze xilinx GPIO

2013-05-01 Thread Michal Simek
Microblaze uses gpio which is connected to the system reset. Currently gpio subsystem wasn't used for it. Add gpio driver and change Microblaze reset logic to be done via gpio subsystem. There are various configurations which Microblaze can have that's why gpio_alloc/gpio_alloc_dual(for dual

[U-Boot] [PATCH v3] fs/ext4: Support device block sizes != 512 bytes

2013-05-01 Thread Egbert Eich
From: Egbert Eich e...@suse.com The 512 byte block size was hard coded in the ext4 file systems. Large harddisks today support bigger block sizes typically 4096 bytes. This patch removes this limitation. Signed-off-by: Egbert Eich e...@suse.com --- Changes for v2:

Re: [U-Boot] u-boot UBI support

2013-05-01 Thread Tom Rini
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 01:54:41PM -0700, Paul B. Henson wrote: On 4/29/2013 1:57 AM, Sascha Silbe wrote: MX28EVK U-Boot ubifsmount recovery UBIFS error (pid 0): ubifs_get_sb: cannot open recovery, error -22 UBIFS error (pid 0): ubifs_mount: Error reading superblock on volume 'recovery'

Re: [U-Boot] Pull request - microblaze

2013-05-01 Thread Tom Rini
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 05/01/2013 03:45 AM, Michal Simek wrote: On 04/30/2013 05:44 PM, Tom Rini wrote: On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 11:26:44AM +0200, Michal Simek wrote: Hi Tom, please pull these microblaze changes to your tree. 2 of that patches was reviewed by

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 4/7] cmd: fpga: Move fpga_loadbitstream to fpga.c

2013-05-01 Thread Tom Rini
On Wed, May 01, 2013 at 10:59:20AM +0200, Michal Simek wrote: In bitstream decoding you can directly check device which you want to load and in fpga.c are fpga_validate and fpga_dev_info functions which should be used for it. Signed-off-by: Michal Simek michal.si...@xilinx.com [snip] +++

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/7] FPGA cleanup + zynq support

2013-05-01 Thread Tom Rini
On Wed, May 01, 2013 at 10:59:16AM +0200, Michal Simek wrote: Fpga code is pretty old and none has tried to clean it up. My attempt is related to new code I want to push to mainline which is add support for checking bitstream and if bitstream is valid for the selected device. For this I need

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 4/7] cmd: fpga: Move fpga_loadbitstream to fpga.c

2013-05-01 Thread Michal Simek
On 05/01/2013 05:03 PM, Tom Rini wrote: On Wed, May 01, 2013 at 10:59:20AM +0200, Michal Simek wrote: In bitstream decoding you can directly check device which you want to load and in fpga.c are fpga_validate and fpga_dev_info functions which should be used for it. Signed-off-by: Michal

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/7] FPGA cleanup + zynq support

2013-05-01 Thread Michal Simek
On 05/01/2013 05:14 PM, Tom Rini wrote: On Wed, May 01, 2013 at 10:59:16AM +0200, Michal Simek wrote: Fpga code is pretty old and none has tried to clean it up. My attempt is related to new code I want to push to mainline which is add support for checking bitstream and if bitstream is valid

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/3] ARM: Tegra: USB: Add driver support for Tegra30/Tegra114

2013-05-01 Thread Tom Warren
Tom, On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 10:20 AM, Tom Rini tr...@ti.com wrote: On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 09:21:18AM -0700, Tom Warren wrote: Marek, -Original Message- From: Marek Vasut [mailto:ma...@denx.de] Sent: Monday, April 29, 2013 4:47 PM To: Jim Lin Cc:

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/3] ARM: Tegra: USB: Add driver support for Tegra30/Tegra114

2013-05-01 Thread Tom Rini
On Wed, May 01, 2013 at 09:16:45AM -0700, Tom Warren wrote: Tom, On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 10:20 AM, Tom Rini tr...@ti.com wrote: On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 09:21:18AM -0700, Tom Warren wrote: Marek, -Original Message- From: Marek Vasut [mailto:ma...@denx.de] Sent:

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v4] i2c: s3c24xx: add hsi2c controller support

2013-05-01 Thread Naveen Krishna Ch
Hello Heiko, On 29 April 2013 21:14, Heiko Schocher h...@denx.de wrote: Hello Naveen, On 26.04.2013 05:08, Naveen Krishna Ch wrote: On 14 April 2013 22:48, Heiko Schocher h...@denx.de wrote: Hello Naveen Krishna, On 13.04.2013 06:42, Naveen Krishna Ch wrote: On 6 April 2013 07:07,

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/3] ARM: Tegra: USB: Add driver support for Tegra30/Tegra114

2013-05-01 Thread Marek Vasut
Dear Tom Rini, On Wed, May 01, 2013 at 09:16:45AM -0700, Tom Warren wrote: Tom, On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 10:20 AM, Tom Rini tr...@ti.com wrote: On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 09:21:18AM -0700, Tom Warren wrote: Marek, -Original Message- From: Marek Vasut

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 08/11] usb: ehci: add Faraday USB 2.0 EHCI support

2013-05-01 Thread Marek Vasut
Dear Kuo-Jung Su, 2013/4/30 Marek Vasut ma...@denx.de: Dear Kuo-Jung Su, 2013/4/26 Marek Vasut ma...@denx.de: Dear Kuo-Jung Su, From: Kuo-Jung Su dant...@faraday-tech.com This patch add supports to both Faraday FUSBH200 and FOTG210, these controllers slightly differ

[U-Boot] [PATCH 0/2] Loader script updates for OpenRISC

2013-05-01 Thread Stefan Kristiansson
This set of patches does: Fix a bug in the openrisc-generic u-boot.lds linker script that would cause an error due to that no memory region was specified for u_boot_lists. And then move the above mentioned file into arch/openrisc/cpu/ to unify the linker script for all openrisc boards (we only

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] openrisc: specify a memory region for u_boot_lists

2013-05-01 Thread Stefan Kristiansson
Since there are two memory areas defined, vectors and ram, the linker will error when neither of them are specified for a section. Signed-off-by: Stefan Kristiansson stefan.kristians...@saunalahti.fi --- board/openrisc/openrisc-generic/u-boot.lds | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1

[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] openrisc: move board linker script(s) to a common in cpu/

2013-05-01 Thread Stefan Kristiansson
Unifies the openrisc boards linker scripts into a common one. Signed-off-by: Stefan Kristiansson stefan.kristians...@saunalahti.fi --- arch/openrisc/config.mk | 2 ++ {board/openrisc/openrisc-generic = arch/openrisc/cpu}/u-boot.lds | 0 2 files changed,

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 0/17] sandbox: Generic board support and other improvements

2013-05-01 Thread Tom Rini
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 06:10:15AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote: Hi Tom, On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 9:08 AM, Simon Glass s...@chromium.org wrote: Hi Tom, On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 8:18 AM, Tom Rini tr...@ti.com wrote: On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 11:42:35AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote: This series

[U-Boot] [PATCH 0/9] mx23: Make DDR initialization stable

2013-05-01 Thread Fabio Estevam
Prior to this series running 'memtester' utility in Linux on a mx23evk always resulted in many errors during stress testing, if the kernel is loaded via U-boot. Running the same test and loading the kernel via FSL bootlets resulted on zero errors. Adjust U-boot so that it can also pass the

[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/9] mx23: regs-pinctrl.h: Add pinctrl support for mx23

2013-05-01 Thread Fabio Estevam
From: Fabio Estevam fabio.este...@freescale.com Provide a mxs_pinctrl_regs structure for mx23. Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam fabio.este...@freescale.com --- arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mxs/regs-pinctrl.h | 68 ++ 1 file changed, 68 insertions(+) diff --git

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/9] mxs: Make the names of the elements of mxs_pinctrl_regs shorter

2013-05-01 Thread Fabio Estevam
From: Fabio Estevam fabio.este...@freescale.com Currently when accessing an element of mxs_pinctrl_regs structure we do: pinctrl_regs-hw_pinctrl_emi_ds_ctrl_set The 'hw_pinctrl' prefix is a redundant information as we already know that we are accessing a pinctrl register. Signed-off-by:

[U-Boot] [PATCH 3/9] mx23evk: Fix DDR pin iomux settings

2013-05-01 Thread Fabio Estevam
From: Fabio Estevam fabio.este...@freescale.com Registers HW_PINCTRL_DRIVE9, HW_PINCTRL_DRIVE10, HW_PINCTRL_DRIVE11, HW_PINCTRL_DRIVE12, HW_PINCTRL_DRIVE13 and HW_PINCTRL_DRIVE14 control the drive strength and the voltage selection for the DDR pins. The reset values of the voltage selection pins

[U-Boot] [PATCH 4/9] mx23_olinuxino: Fix DDR pin iomux settings

2013-05-01 Thread Fabio Estevam
From: Fabio Estevam fabio.este...@freescale.com Registers HW_PINCTRL_DRIVE9, HW_PINCTRL_DRIVE10, HW_PINCTRL_DRIVE11, HW_PINCTRL_DRIVE12, HW_PINCTRL_DRIVE13 and HW_PINCTRL_DRIVE14 control the drive strength and the voltage selection for the DDR pins. The reset values of the voltage selection pins

[U-Boot] [PATCH 5/9] mx23evk: Disable the internal pad keepers

2013-05-01 Thread Fabio Estevam
From: Fabio Estevam fabio.este...@freescale.com Disable the internal pad keepers to match the code from FSL bootlets and provide better stability. Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam fabio.este...@freescale.com --- board/freescale/mx23evk/spl_boot.c |4 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff

[U-Boot] [PATCH 7/9] mxs: spl_mem_init: Remove unneeded DRAM configurations

2013-05-01 Thread Fabio Estevam
From: Fabio Estevam fabio.este...@freescale.com There is no need to write to DRAM_CTL8 register prior to nitialize_dram_values(). Fix a comment related to writing to DRAM_CTL8. Also, DRAM_CTL18 register on mx23 does not contain DRAM init complete bit, so remove this setting as this is also not

[U-Boot] [PATCH 8/9] mxs: spl_mem_init: Skip the initialization of some DRAM_CTL registers

2013-05-01 Thread Fabio Estevam
From: Fabio Estevam fabio.este...@freescale.com HW_DRAM_CTL27, HW_DRAM_CTL28 and HW_DRAM_CTL35 are not initialized as per FSL bootlets code. mx23 Reference Manual mark HW_DRAM_CTL27 and HW_DRAM_CTL28 as reserved. HW_DRAM_CTL8 is setup as the last element. So skip the initialization of these

[U-Boot] [PATCH 6/9] mx23_olinuxino: Disable the internal pad keepers

2013-05-01 Thread Fabio Estevam
From: Fabio Estevam fabio.este...@freescale.com Disable the internal pad keepers to match the code from FSL bootlets and provide better stability. Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam fabio.este...@freescale.com --- board/olimex/mx23_olinuxino/spl_boot.c |4 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

[U-Boot] [PATCH 9/9] mxs: spl_mem_init: Change EMI port priority

2013-05-01 Thread Fabio Estevam
From: Fabio Estevam fabio.este...@freescale.com FSL bootlets code set the PORT_PRIORITY_ORDER field of register HW_EMI_CTRL as 0x2, which means: PORT0231 = 0x02 Priority Order: AXI0, AHB2, AHB3, AHB1 Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam fabio.este...@freescale.com ---

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/3] ARM: Tegra: USB: Add driver support for Tegra30/Tegra114

2013-05-01 Thread Tom Warren
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 12:33 PM, Marek Vasut ma...@denx.de wrote: Dear Tom Rini, On Wed, May 01, 2013 at 09:16:45AM -0700, Tom Warren wrote: Tom, On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 10:20 AM, Tom Rini tr...@ti.com wrote: On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 09:21:18AM -0700, Tom Warren wrote: Marek,

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/3] ARM: Tegra: USB: Add driver support for Tegra30/Tegra114

2013-05-01 Thread Tom Warren
Adding Jim back into the conversation since he got dropped a couple of emails back. On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 4:20 PM, Tom Warren twarren.nvi...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 12:33 PM, Marek Vasut ma...@denx.de wrote: Dear Tom Rini, On Wed, May 01, 2013 at 09:16:45AM -0700, Tom

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/9] mxs: Make the names of the elements of mxs_pinctrl_regs shorter

2013-05-01 Thread Marek Vasut
Dear Fabio Estevam, From: Fabio Estevam fabio.este...@freescale.com Currently when accessing an element of mxs_pinctrl_regs structure we do: pinctrl_regs-hw_pinctrl_emi_ds_ctrl_set The 'hw_pinctrl' prefix is a redundant information as we already know that we are accessing a pinctrl

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/9] mx23: regs-pinctrl.h: Add pinctrl support for mx23

2013-05-01 Thread Marek Vasut
Dear Fabio Estevam, From: Fabio Estevam fabio.este...@freescale.com Provide a mxs_pinctrl_regs structure for mx23. Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam fabio.este...@freescale.com So the pinctrl structure was always wrong on mx23? Otavio? Best regards, Marek Vasut

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/9] mx23evk: Fix DDR pin iomux settings

2013-05-01 Thread Marek Vasut
Dear Fabio Estevam, From: Fabio Estevam fabio.este...@freescale.com Registers HW_PINCTRL_DRIVE9, HW_PINCTRL_DRIVE10, HW_PINCTRL_DRIVE11, HW_PINCTRL_DRIVE12, HW_PINCTRL_DRIVE13 and HW_PINCTRL_DRIVE14 control the drive strength and the voltage selection for the DDR pins. The reset values

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 4/9] mx23_olinuxino: Fix DDR pin iomux settings

2013-05-01 Thread Marek Vasut
Dear Fabio Estevam, From: Fabio Estevam fabio.este...@freescale.com Registers HW_PINCTRL_DRIVE9, HW_PINCTRL_DRIVE10, HW_PINCTRL_DRIVE11, HW_PINCTRL_DRIVE12, HW_PINCTRL_DRIVE13 and HW_PINCTRL_DRIVE14 control the drive strength and the voltage selection for the DDR pins. The reset values

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 7/9] mxs: spl_mem_init: Remove unneeded DRAM configurations

2013-05-01 Thread Marek Vasut
Dear Fabio Estevam, From: Fabio Estevam fabio.este...@freescale.com There is no need to write to DRAM_CTL8 register prior to nitialize_dram_values(). Fix a comment related to writing to DRAM_CTL8. Also, DRAM_CTL18 register on mx23 does not contain DRAM init complete bit, so remove

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 8/9] mxs: spl_mem_init: Skip the initialization of some DRAM_CTL registers

2013-05-01 Thread Marek Vasut
Dear Fabio Estevam, From: Fabio Estevam fabio.este...@freescale.com HW_DRAM_CTL27, HW_DRAM_CTL28 and HW_DRAM_CTL35 are not initialized as per FSL bootlets code. mx23 Reference Manual mark HW_DRAM_CTL27 and HW_DRAM_CTL28 as reserved. HW_DRAM_CTL8 is setup as the last element. So skip

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/9] mxs: Make the names of the elements of mxs_pinctrl_regs shorter

2013-05-01 Thread Fabio Estevam
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 8:26 PM, Marek Vasut ma...@denx.de wrote: Dear Fabio Estevam, From: Fabio Estevam fabio.este...@freescale.com Currently when accessing an element of mxs_pinctrl_regs structure we do: pinctrl_regs-hw_pinctrl_emi_ds_ctrl_set The 'hw_pinctrl' prefix is a redundant

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/9] mx23: regs-pinctrl.h: Add pinctrl support for mx23

2013-05-01 Thread Fabio Estevam
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 8:27 PM, Marek Vasut ma...@denx.de wrote: Dear Fabio Estevam, From: Fabio Estevam fabio.este...@freescale.com Provide a mxs_pinctrl_regs structure for mx23. Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam fabio.este...@freescale.com So the pinctrl structure was always wrong on mx23?

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 4/9] mx23_olinuxino: Fix DDR pin iomux settings

2013-05-01 Thread Fabio Estevam
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 8:28 PM, Marek Vasut ma...@denx.de wrote: Lost of duplicated code here. What do you suggest? ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 7/9] mxs: spl_mem_init: Remove unneeded DRAM configurations

2013-05-01 Thread Fabio Estevam
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 8:29 PM, Marek Vasut ma...@denx.de wrote: Do you not need to stop the DRAM if it's already running? Like after a software reset? I don't think this is needed. FSL bootlets code does not do this. ___ U-Boot mailing list

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/9] mx23evk: Fix DDR pin iomux settings

2013-05-01 Thread Fabio Estevam
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 8:28 PM, Marek Vasut ma...@denx.de wrote: Uh, should the pinctrl/iomux stuff not set these up properly? This is mx23 and EMI pins specific, so I think it is OK to do it in the board file. ___ U-Boot mailing list

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/9] mxs: Make the names of the elements of mxs_pinctrl_regs shorter

2013-05-01 Thread Marek Vasut
Dear Fabio Estevam, On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 8:26 PM, Marek Vasut ma...@denx.de wrote: Dear Fabio Estevam, From: Fabio Estevam fabio.este...@freescale.com Currently when accessing an element of mxs_pinctrl_regs structure we do: pinctrl_regs-hw_pinctrl_emi_ds_ctrl_set The

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/9] mx23: regs-pinctrl.h: Add pinctrl support for mx23

2013-05-01 Thread Marek Vasut
Dear Fabio Estevam, On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 8:27 PM, Marek Vasut ma...@denx.de wrote: Dear Fabio Estevam, From: Fabio Estevam fabio.este...@freescale.com Provide a mxs_pinctrl_regs structure for mx23. Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam fabio.este...@freescale.com So the pinctrl

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/9] mx23evk: Fix DDR pin iomux settings

2013-05-01 Thread Marek Vasut
Dear Fabio Estevam, On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 8:28 PM, Marek Vasut ma...@denx.de wrote: Uh, should the pinctrl/iomux stuff not set these up properly? This is mx23 and EMI pins specific, so I think it is OK to do it in the board file. Yes, but should the iomux_setup[] configure that already?

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 4/9] mx23_olinuxino: Fix DDR pin iomux settings

2013-05-01 Thread Marek Vasut
Dear Fabio Estevam, On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 8:28 PM, Marek Vasut ma...@denx.de wrote: Lost of duplicated code here. What do you suggest? Stuff it into common init sequence, but only if it really is necessary to wipe those registers and iomux_setup[] table doesn't do it for some reason.

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 7/9] mxs: spl_mem_init: Remove unneeded DRAM configurations

2013-05-01 Thread Marek Vasut
Dear Fabio Estevam, On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 8:29 PM, Marek Vasut ma...@denx.de wrote: Do you not need to stop the DRAM if it's already running? Like after a software reset? I don't think this is needed. FSL bootlets code does not do this. You'll end up messing with configuration registers

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 7/9] mxs: spl_mem_init: Remove unneeded DRAM configurations

2013-05-01 Thread Fabio Estevam
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 9:15 PM, Marek Vasut ma...@denx.de wrote: You'll end up messing with configuration registers on already-running RAM. That HW_DRAM_CTL08, bit 16 (START) is 0 (inactive) after a reset, so no need to turn off the RAM. ___ U-Boot

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/9] mx23: regs-pinctrl.h: Add pinctrl support for mx23

2013-05-01 Thread Fabio Estevam
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 9:13 PM, Marek Vasut ma...@denx.de wrote: How come? Doesn't the board/...mx23.../spl_boot.c use that? Or iomux.c in FSL's parlance. I meant mxs_pinctrl_regs structure is only referenced for mx28 currently: #ifdef CONFIG_MX28 static void mx28_mem_init(void) {

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 08/11] usb: ehci: add Faraday USB 2.0 EHCI support

2013-05-01 Thread Kuo-Jung Su
2013/5/2 Marek Vasut ma...@denx.de: Dear Kuo-Jung Su, 2013/4/30 Marek Vasut ma...@denx.de: Dear Kuo-Jung Su, 2013/4/26 Marek Vasut ma...@denx.de: Dear Kuo-Jung Su, From: Kuo-Jung Su dant...@faraday-tech.com This patch add supports to both Faraday FUSBH200 and FOTG210,

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/9] mx23: regs-pinctrl.h: Add pinctrl support for mx23

2013-05-01 Thread Marek Vasut
Dear Fabio Estevam, On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 9:13 PM, Marek Vasut ma...@denx.de wrote: How come? Doesn't the board/...mx23.../spl_boot.c use that? Or iomux.c in FSL's parlance. I meant mxs_pinctrl_regs structure is only referenced for mx28 currently: #ifdef CONFIG_MX28 static void

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 4/9] mx23_olinuxino: Fix DDR pin iomux settings

2013-05-01 Thread Fabio Estevam
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 9:14 PM, Marek Vasut ma...@denx.de wrote: Stuff it into common init sequence, but only if it really is necessary to wipe those registers and iomux_setup[] table doesn't do it for some reason. But then, if iomux_setup[] table doesn't configure them, there's a deeper

[U-Boot] uboot for cavium octeon 2 MIPS SOC

2013-05-01 Thread Edward K
Hi to all. Someone has experience in initialization DDR3 RAM 32bit width mode for this processor? Thanks -- View this message in context: http://u-boot.10912.n7.nabble.com/uboot-for-cavium-octeon-2-MIPS-SOC-tp153711.html Sent from the U-Boot mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] powerpc/mpc85xx: add setting of clock-frequency for mpic node

2013-05-01 Thread Wang Dongsheng-B40534
Hi Andy, Could you please apply this patch? http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/217104/ Thanks. - dongsheng -Original Message- From: Wang Dongsheng-B40534 Sent: Monday, March 11, 2013 5:31 PM To: Fleming Andy-AFLEMING Cc: 'u-boot@lists.denx.de' Subject: RE: [PATCH]

[U-Boot] questions about dp83848 on mpc8315e board

2013-05-01 Thread du zhenhuan
Hello, I'm using customized mpc8315e board with a PHY called DP83848 , I have changed tsec file to support DP83848, and link's status led is blinkging after cable is connected to PC. But when I set the ip etc and to ping a PC , I got this error: ping 192.168.2.157 Trying eTSEC0

[U-Boot] [PATCH v1] bfin: Move gpio support for bf54x and bf60x into the generic driver folder.

2013-05-01 Thread Sonic Zhang
From: Sonic Zhang sonic.zh...@analog.com The gpio spec for bf54x and bf60x differ a lot from the old gpio driver for bf5xx. A lot of machine macros are used to accomodate both code in one gpio driver. This patch split the old gpio driver and move new gpio2 support to the generic gpio driver