Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/2] arm: add support for semihosting for ARMv7M targets

Hello Vadzim, On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 00:13:28 +0300, Vadzim Dambrouski wrote: > It is possible to enable CONFIG_SEMIHOSTING for STM32F429 target, but it > would result in compile error. This patch adds support for semihosting for > STM32F429 or any other ARMv7M target. Tested on

[U-Boot] [PATCH] nios2: add README.nios2

Add README.nios2 about how to add nios2 boards to u-boot. Signed-off-by: Thomas Chou --- doc/README.nios2 | 86 1 file changed, 86 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/README.nios2 diff --git a/doc/README.nios2

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 2/2] arm: fix compile warnings when semihosting is enabled on ARMv7M target.

Hello Vadzim, On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 00:13:29 +0300, Vadzim Dambrouski wrote: > Signed-off-by: Vadzim Dambrouski > --- > > arch/arm/lib/semihosting.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/lib/semihosting.c

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: add support for semihosting for ARMv7M targets

On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 11:45 AM, Vadzim Dambrouski wrote: > On 18.10.2015 12:20, Linus Walleij wrote: >> Hey, cool. Technically the (ulong) typecasts should be another patch > > Sorry about that, this is my first time sending a patch. > >> Are you using this with the smload

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3] ARM: relocate: fix hang when CONFIG_ARMV7_SECURE_BASE

Hi Albert, On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 08:48:56AM +0200, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: >Hello Peng, > >On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 13:40:51 +0800, Peng Fan >wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 05:13:24PM -0500, Frank Li wrote: >> >When added above configuration, iram fix up plus relocate offset

Re: [U-Boot] [ELCE2015] Question about schedule

Hi Lukasz, On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 7:17 PM, Lukasz Majewski wrote: > Hi Bin, > >> Hi, >> >> On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 6:34 AM, Tom Rini wrote: >> > On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 10:38:50AM +0200, Lukasz Majewski wrote: >> > >> >> Hi Tom, >> >> >> >> Is there

[U-Boot] (last minute) pull request: u-boot-arm/master

Hello Tom, A last-minute fix, maybe it can go in 2015.10 since this is a single-target bugfix by the maintainer? The following changes since commit ac6a53219a1bf5bd30b754d6d3f04f26e3921d15: Merge git://git.denx.de/u-boot-socfpga (2015-10-16 20:21:04 -0400) are available in the git repository

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 11/20] dm: serial: Update binding for PL01x serial UART

On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 9:41 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >> Ah right. I don't think that naming is super critical though, as a lot >> of properties in the DT just describe how things are at boot time. > > Hence those don't describe the hardware... > Shouldn't they be in

[U-Boot] (CORRECTED last minute) pull request: u-boot-arm/master

On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 08:11:25 +0200, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > Hello Tom, > > A last-minute fix, maybe it can go in 2015.10 since this is a > single-target bugfix by the maintainer? Actually, two bug-fixes: The following changes since commit

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3] ARM: relocate: fix hang when CONFIG_ARMV7_SECURE_BASE

Hello Peng, On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 13:40:51 +0800, Peng Fan wrote: > On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 05:13:24PM -0500, Frank Li wrote: > >When added above configuration, iram fix up plus relocate offset may locate > >in invalidate space. Write back fix up value will cause data abort.

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v7 5/9] arm: serial: Add ability to use pre-initialized UARTs

On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 12:27 AM, Simon Glass wrote: > On 16 October 2015 at 15:23, Linus Walleij wrote: >> Again: get this merged in the Linux kernel FIRST. Is it? > > We had a little bit of a chat about this at ELCE. It would be great to > get

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] dfu: dfu_sf: Use the erase sector size for erase operations

Hi Fabio, > Hi Lukasz, > > On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 4:46 AM, Lukasz Majewski > wrote: > > Hi Fabio, > > > >> From: Fabio Estevam > >> > >> SPI NOR flashes need to erase the entire sector size and we cannot > >> pass any arbitrary length for

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 00/14] Implement fastboot over NAND and sparse transfers

On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 04:42:09PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > On 17-10-15 15:59, Hans de Goede wrote: > >Hi, > > > >On 15-10-15 14:34, Maxime Ripard wrote: > >>Hi everyone, > >> > >>Here is the second attempt at getting fastboot flashing functions > >>working on top of a NAND, for

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v8 1/3] dm: implement a Timer uclass

Hi Simon, On 10/19/2015 09:53 AM, Simon Glass wrote: Please do create a test for this uclass using a fake sandbox timer. Note also time_ut.c which might have some ideas. I am learning sandbox and working on a sandbox timer now. Best regards, Thomas

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] dfu: dfu_sf: Use the erase sector size for erase operations

On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 6:07 AM, Lukasz Majewski wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 4:46 AM, Lukasz Majewski >> wrote: >> >> From: Fabio Estevam >> >> >> >> SPI NOR flashes need to erase the entire sector size and we

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] dfu: dfu_sf: Use the erase sector size for erase operations

Hi Otavio, > On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 6:07 AM, Lukasz Majewski > wrote: > >> On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 4:46 AM, Lukasz Majewski > >> wrote: > >> >> From: Fabio Estevam > >> >> > >> >> SPI NOR flashes need to erase the

[U-Boot] [PATCH v3 2/2] vexpress64: Juno: Add initialisation code for Juno R1 PCIe host bridge.

Juno R1 has an XpressRICH3 PCIe host bridge that needs to be initialised in order for the Linux kernel to be able to enumerate the bus. Add support code here that enables the host bridge, trains the links and sets up the Address Translation Tables. Signed-off-by: Liviu Dudau

[U-Boot] [PATCH v3 1/2] vexpress64: Juno: Declare all 8GB of RAM and make them visible to the kernel.

Juno comes with 8GB RAM, but U-Boot only passes 2GB to the kernel. Declare a secondary memory bank and set the sizes correctly. Signed-off-by: Liviu Dudau Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij Reviewed-by: Ryan Harkin Tested-by:

[U-Boot] [PATCH v3 0/2] vexpress64: Juno: Add support for PCIe on Juno

Hello, This patchset enables PCIe for ARM's Juno boards and configures the host bridge's address translation block. This enables the Linux kernel to boot on Juno r1 using just a device tree and the generic host bridge driver. No support has been added at this phase for the SATA or Ethernet

[U-Boot] [Patch V6 06/18] net/fm: Make the return value logic consistent with convention

From: Hou Zhiqiang In convention, the '0' is a normal return value indicating there isn't an error. While some functions of FMan IM driver treat '0' as an error return value. Signed-off-by: Hou Zhiqiang Signed-off-by: Gong Qianyu

[U-Boot] [Patch V6 14/18] armv8/ls1043ardb: Add nand boot support

From: Gong Qianyu Signed-off-by: Gong Qianyu Signed-off-by: Hou Zhiqiang Signed-off-by: Shaohui Xie Signed-off-by: Mingkai Hu --- V6: - No change. V5: - No

[U-Boot] [Patch V6 04/18] net/fm/eth: Use mb() to be compatible for both ARM and PowerPC

From: Shaohui Xie Use mb() instead of sync() to be compatible for both ARM and PowerPC. Signed-off-by: Shaohui Xie Signed-off-by: Mingkai Hu Signed-off-by: Gong Qianyu --- V6: - No

[U-Boot] [Patch V6 17/18] armv8/ls1043ardb: Add sd boot support

From: Gong Qianyu Signed-off-by: Gong Qianyu --- V6: - No change. V5: - No change. V4: - No change. V3: - Squash the add cpld command patch to it. V2: - No change. board/freescale/ls1043ardb/README| 1 +

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] net: convert altera_tse to driver model and phylib

On Monday, October 19, 2015 at 04:36:21 AM, Thomas Chou wrote: Hi! > Convert altera_tse to driver model and phylib. > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Chou > --- > configs/nios2-generic_defconfig | 2 + > doc/device-tree-bindings/net/altera_tse.txt | 112 >

Re: [U-Boot] Doubt in USB driver for Vybrid vf610

Hi Sanchayan, We are using a custom board with vybrid processor,in which we need to configure USB0 as host and USB1 as client. Regards, Santhosh -Original Message- From: maitysancha...@gmail.com [mailto:maitysancha...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, October 19, 2015 10:59 AM To: ma...@denx.de

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 2/2] vexpress64: Juno: Add initialisation code for Juno R1 PCIe host bridge.

On Fri, 16 Oct 2015 17:58:44 +0100 Ryan Harkin wrote: > Hi Liviu, > > These patches work well for me, so at the very least, you can add my > Test-by for both: > > Tested-by: Ryan Harkin Hi Ryan, Thanks for testing this patchset. > > But... >

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3] ARM: relocate: fix hang when CONFIG_ARMV7_SECURE_BASE

Hello Peng, (cutting a bit through the previous mails quoting) > >This, in turn, leads to new questions: > > > >1. How is this PSCI code put in place? Is it bundled with the image, > > with a specificy copy routine which puts it in place then locks the > Yeah. > > memory range against

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: sunxi: Add icnova-a20-swac defconfig and dts file

Hi Hans, On 19.10.2015 13:44, Hans de Goede wrote: diff --git a/arch/arm/dts/sun7i-a20-icnova-a20-swac.dts b/arch/arm/dts/sun7i-a20-icnova-a20-swac.dts new file mode 100644 Please submit this file also to the upstream kernel. Yes. The name of the DT especially doesn't really make sense.

[U-Boot] [Patch V6 13/18] armv8/ls1043ardb: Add LS1043ARDB board support

From: Mingkai Hu LS1043ARDB Specification: - Memory subsystem: * 2GByte DDR4 SDRAM (32bit bus) * 128 Mbyte NOR flash single-chip memory * 512 Mbyte NAND flash * 16 Mbyte high-speed SPI flash * SD connector to interface with the SD memory

[U-Boot] [Patch V6 09/18] net/fm: Add QSGMII PCS init

From: Shaohui Xie QSGMII PCS needed to be programmed same as SGMII PCS, and there are four ports in QSGMII PCS, port 0, 1, 2, 3, all the four ports shared port 0's MDIO controller, so when programming port 0, we continue to program other three ports. Signed-off-by:

[U-Boot] [Patch V6 08/18] net: Move some header files to include/

From: Shaohui Xie The fsl_dtsec.h & fsl_tgec.h & fsl_fman.h can be shared on both ARM and PPC, move it out of ppc to include/, and change the path in drivers accordingly. Signed-off-by: Shaohui Xie Signed-off-by: Gong Qianyu

[U-Boot] [Patch V6 07/18] net: fm: bug fix when CONFIG_PHYLIB not defined

From: Shaohui Xie codes related to phylib operations should be wrapped by CONFIG_PHYLIB. Signed-off-by: Shaohui Xie Signed-off-by: Gong Qianyu --- V6: - Fix all codes related to phylib to be wrapped by

[U-Boot] [Patch V6 10/18] net/fm: fix MDIO controller base on FMAN2

From: Shaohui Xie MDIO controller base on FMAN2 was defined as CONFIG_SYS_FSL_FM2_ADDR plus offset, but CONFIG_SYS_FSL_FM2_ADDR only defined when there are two FMANs, so we should only define MDIO controller base on FMAN2 when there is FMAN2. Signed-off-by: Shaohui

[U-Boot] [Patch V6 16/18] armv8/ls1043ardb: esdhc: Add esdhc support for ls1043ardb

From: Yangbo Lu This patch adds esdhc support for ls1043ardb. Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu Signed-off-by: Gong Qianyu --- V6: - No change. V5: - No change. V4: - Use CONFIG_FSL_ESDHC to enable get_sdhc_freq(). -

[U-Boot] [Patch V6 05/18] net/fm: Add support for 64-bit platforms

From: Hou Zhiqiang The FMan IM driver is developed for 32-bit platfroms and isn't friendly to 64-bit platforms, so do the minimal refactor: 1. Refine the MURAM management and access. 2. Correct the initialization and operations for QDs and BDs. Signed-off-by: Hou Zhiqiang

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] nios2: add README.nios2

On Monday, October 19, 2015 at 08:06:16 AM, Thomas Chou wrote: Hi! > Add README.nios2 about how to add nios2 boards to u-boot. > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Chou > --- > doc/README.nios2 | 86 > 1 file changed, > 86

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3] ARM: relocate: fix hang when CONFIG_ARMV7_SECURE_BASE

Hi Albert, On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 01:48:25PM +0200, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: >Hello Peng, > >(cutting a bit through the previous mails quoting) > >> >This, in turn, leads to new questions: >> > >> >1. How is this PSCI code put in place? Is it bundled with the image, >> > with a specificy copy

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] dfu: dfu_sf: Use the erase sector size for erase operations

Hi Tom, > On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 6:07 AM, Lukasz Majewski > wrote: > >> On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 4:46 AM, Lukasz Majewski > >> wrote: > >> >> From: Fabio Estevam > >> >> > >> >> SPI NOR flashes need to erase the

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v8 1/4] include: Add log2 and fls64 header fi

On 17 October 2015 at 02:11, Fabio Estevam wrote: > From: Fabio Estevam > > Use the log2 and fls64 header files directly from the kernel. > > Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam > --- > Changes since v7: > - None > >

[U-Boot] [Patch V6 11/18] armv8/fsl_lsch3: Change arch to fsl-layerscape

From: Mingkai Hu There are two LS series processors are built on ARMv8 Layersacpe architecture currently, LS2085A and LS1043A. They are based on ARMv8 core although use different chassis, so create fsl-layerscape to refactor the common code for the LS series processors

[U-Boot] [Patch V6 18/18] armv8/ls1043a: Enable secondary cores

From: Hou Zhiqiang After the secondary cores enter U-Boot, use CONFIG_ARMV8_MULTIENTRY to make secondary cores to excute in spin loop. Signed-off-by: Hou Zhiqiang Signed-off-by: Mingkai Hu Signed-off-by: Gong Qianyu

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v7 5/9] arm: serial: Add ability to use pre-initialized UARTs

Hi Linus, On 19 October 2015 at 01:15, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 12:27 AM, Simon Glass wrote: >> On 16 October 2015 at 15:23, Linus Walleij wrote: > >>> Again: get this merged in the Linux kernel FIRST.

[U-Boot] [PATCH v4 4/8] arm: Switch aarch64 to using generic global_data setup

There is quite a bit of assembler code that can be removed if we use the generic global_data setup. Less arch-specific code makes it easier to add new features and maintain the start-up code. Drop the unneeded code and adjust the hooks in board_f.c to cope. Tested on LS2085ARDB and LS2085AQDS

[U-Boot] [PATCH v4 5/8] arm: Switch 32-bit ARM to using generic global_data setup

There is quite a bit of assembler code that can be removed if we use the generic global_data setup. Less arch-specific code makes it easier to add new features and maintain the start-up code. Drop the unneeded code and adjust the hooks in board_f.c to cope. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass

[U-Boot] [PATCH v4 7/8] zynq: Move SPL console init out of board_init_f()

We should not init the console this early since it precludes using driver model for the UART, since it is not set up at the start of board_init_f(). See the README for more information. The debug UART does not have this restriction. If we want to do early init with the console on it can be done in

[U-Boot] [PATCH v4 2/8] board_init_f_mem(): Don't require memset()

Unfortunately memset() is not always available, so provide a substitute when needed. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass --- Changes in v4: - Remove the 'end' variable in board_init_f_mem() Changes in v3: None Changes in v2: - Add comments as to why this is needed, deal with

[U-Boot] [PATCH v4 1/8] Move board_init_f_mem() into a common location

This function will be used by both SPL and U-Boot proper. So move it into a common place. Also change the #ifdef so that the early malloc() area is not set up in SPL if CONFIG_SYS_SPL_MALLOC_START is defined. In that case it would never actually be used, and just chews up stack space.

[U-Boot] [PATCH v4 0/8] arm: Tidy up early init

This series collects the previous RFT patches I sent out. https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/508167/ https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/508168/ It turns out that I originally sent a version of these in April: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/461687/ https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/461690/

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: sunxi: Add icnova-a20-swac defconfig and dts file

Hi, On 19-10-15 12:38, Stefan Roese wrote: Hi Hans, On 17.10.2015 15:47, Hans de Goede wrote: On 01-10-15 11:41, Stefan Roese wrote: The ICnova-A20-SWAC is a baseboard, equipped with the ICnova-A20 SoM from In-Circuit: http://wiki.in-circuit.de/index.php5?title=ICnova_A20_SODIMM

[U-Boot] [Patch V6 12/18] armv8/fsl_lsch2: Add fsl_lsch2 SoC

From: Mingkai Hu Freescale LayerScape with Chassis Generation 2 is a set of SoCs with ARMv8 cores and 2rd generation of Chassis. Signed-off-by: Li Yang Signed-off-by: Hou Zhiqiang Signed-off-by: Mingkai Hu

[U-Boot] [Patch V6 00/18] add LS1043A platform support

Hi All, Here are the changes for version 6 patchset. Please kindly help to review the patchset. - Added secondary core support - Added ls2085a simulator/emulator into the arch-fsl-layerscape framework - Moved some SoC related macors from board header file into config.h - serdes_prtl

[U-Boot] [Patch V6 15/18] armv8/ls1043a: Add Fman support

From: Shaohui Xie Signed-off-by: Hou Zhiqiang Signed-off-by: Shaohui Xie Signed-off-by: Mingkai Hu Signed-off-by: Gong Qianyu --- V6: - No change. V5: - No

[U-Boot] [Patch V6 02/18] common/board_f.c: modify the macro to use get_clocks() more common

From: Gong Qianyu get_clocks() should not be limited by ESDHC. Signed-off-by: Gong Qianyu --- V6: - No change. V5: - No change. V4: - No change. V3: - Removed defines in PPC configs that have no need to use. V2: - No change.

[U-Boot] [Patch V6 01/18] armv7/ls1021a: move ns_access to common file

From: Mingkai Hu Config Security Level Register is different between different SoCs, so put the CSL register definition into the arch specific directory. Signed-off-by: Mingkai Hu Signed-off-by: Gong Qianyu --- V6:

[U-Boot] [PATCH v4 3/8] board_init_f_mem(): Don't create an unused early malloc() area

Change the #ifdef so that the early malloc() area is not set up in SPL if CONFIG_SYS_SPL_MALLOC_START is defined. In that case it would never actually be used, and just chews up stack space. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass Tested-by: Masahiro Yamada

[U-Boot] [PATCH v4 8/8] Revert "ARM: zynq: disable CONFIG_SYS_MALLOC_F to fix MMC boot"

This reverts commit 321f86e18d6aae9f7b7ba3ef1eb0cec769481874. The original bug has been fixed. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass Tested-on: Zedboard and ZC706 board Tested-by: Masahiro Yamada Tested-on: zc702 Tested-by: Michal Simek

[U-Boot] [PATCH v4 6/8] microblaze: Add a TODO to call board_init_f_mem()

This C function should be used to do the early memory layout and init. This is beyond my powers, so just add a TODO for the maintainer. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass Acked-by: Michal Simek --- Changes in v4: None Changes in v3: None Changes in v2: None

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v7 5/9] arm: serial: Add ability to use pre-initialized UARTs

Jon & Grant especially: On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 2:44 PM, Simon Glass wrote: > Me >> I will go in and answer the comment on the DT mailing list so there is >> some push atleast. > > Perhaps if we could see some movement then it would provide > encouragement to continue. So far

Re: [U-Boot] mmc erase fails from U-Boot command line

Dear Cliff, On 10/16/2015 01:46 PM, Cliff Brust wrote: > I have the need to erase our eMMC from U-Boot on our custom board due to a > hard wired > boot up configuration. Our design is based on the Freescale i.MX6Q SabreSD > Board > reference design. The bottom line is the U-Boot command "mmc

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: sunxi: Add icnova-a20-swac defconfig and dts file

Hi, On 19-10-15 12:48, Stefan Roese wrote: Hi Maxime, On 18.10.2015 11:34, Maxime Ripard wrote: On 01-10-15 11:41, Stefan Roese wrote: The ICnova-A20-SWAC is a baseboard, equipped with the ICnova-A20 SoM from In-Circuit: http://wiki.in-circuit.de/index.php5?title=ICnova_A20_SODIMM

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] configs: ls1021atwr: Enable ID EEPROM for SD boot

Hi Yuan On 19/10/15 05:21 AM, Yao Yuan wrote: Hi Sinan Akman, Yes, I mean the Rev 1.0 silicon. Sorry, I can't guarantee that there aren't any boards with Rev1.0 silicon are in user's hands. Because we have also delivery very little board with Rev1.0 silicon to customer or developer for

[U-Boot] [Patch V6 03/18] net/fm: Fix the endian issue to support both endianness platforms

From: Hou Zhiqiang The Frame Manager(FMan) is a big-endian peripheral, so the registers, internal MURAM and BDs, which are allocated in main memory and used to communication between core and FMan, should be accessed in big-endian. The big-endian platforms can access them

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3] ARM: relocate: fix hang when CONFIG_ARMV7_SECURE_BASE

Hello Peng, On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 15:19:09 +0800, Peng Fan wrote: > Hi Albert, > On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 08:48:56AM +0200, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > >Hello Peng, > > > >On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 13:40:51 +0800, Peng Fan > >wrote: > >> On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] configs: ls1021atwr: Enable ID EEPROM for SD boot

Hi Sinan Akman, Yes, I mean the Rev 1.0 silicon. Sorry, I can't guarantee that there aren't any boards with Rev1.0 silicon are in user's hands. Because we have also delivery very little board with Rev1.0 silicon to customer or developer for developing, assessing and verifying in the early

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: sunxi: Add icnova-a20-swac defconfig and dts file

Hi Hans, On 17.10.2015 15:47, Hans de Goede wrote: On 01-10-15 11:41, Stefan Roese wrote: The ICnova-A20-SWAC is a baseboard, equipped with the ICnova-A20 SoM from In-Circuit: http://wiki.in-circuit.de/index.php5?title=ICnova_A20_SODIMM http://linux-sunxi.org/In-Circuit_ICnova_A20 This patch

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: sunxi: Add icnova-a20-swac defconfig and dts file

Hi Maxime, On 18.10.2015 11:34, Maxime Ripard wrote: On 01-10-15 11:41, Stefan Roese wrote: The ICnova-A20-SWAC is a baseboard, equipped with the ICnova-A20 SoM from In-Circuit: http://wiki.in-circuit.de/index.php5?title=ICnova_A20_SODIMM http://linux-sunxi.org/In-Circuit_ICnova_A20 This

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] RFC: dm: Add proposed timeline and guide for porting serial drivers

Hi, On 18-10-15 14:18, Simon Glass wrote: Hi, On 9 September 2015 at 12:06, Simon Glass wrote: Hi, On Saturday, 5 September 2015, Siarhei Siamashka wrote: On Sat, 5 Sep 2015 15:52:03 +0200 Hans de Goede wrote: Hi,

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 2/2] vexpress64: Juno: Add initialisation code for Juno R1 PCIe host bridge.

On 19 October 2015 at 11:08, Liviu Dudau wrote: > Juno R1 has an XpressRICH3 PCIe host bridge that needs to be initialised > in order for the Linux kernel to be able to enumerate the bus. Add > support code here that enables the host bridge, trains the links and > sets

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3] ARM: relocate: fix hang when CONFIG_ARMV7_SECURE_BASE

Hi Albert, On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 10:23:40AM +0200, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: >Hello Peng, > >On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 15:19:09 +0800, Peng Fan >wrote: >> Hi Albert, >> On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 08:48:56AM +0200, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: >> >Hello Peng, >> > >> >On Mon, 19 Oct 2015

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 2/2] vexpress64: Juno: Add initialisation code for Juno R1 PCIe host bridge.

On 19 October 2015 at 10:10, Liviu Dudau wrote: > On Fri, 16 Oct 2015 17:58:44 +0100 > Ryan Harkin wrote: > > > Hi Liviu, > > > > These patches work well for me, so at the very least, you can add my > > Test-by for both: > > > > Tested-by: Ryan

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 4/5] dm: usb: Add support for USB keyboards with driver model

Hi, On 19-10-15 01:17, Simon Glass wrote: Hi Hans, On 12 September 2015 at 09:15, Hans de Goede wrote: Hi, On 08-09-15 19:15, Simon Glass wrote: Switch USB keyboards over to use driver model instead of scanning with the horrible usb_get_dev_index() function. This

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: sunxi: Add icnova-a20-swac defconfig and dts file

Hi Hans, On 17.10.2015 15:47, Hans de Goede wrote: On 01-10-15 11:41, Stefan Roese wrote: The ICnova-A20-SWAC is a baseboard, equipped with the ICnova-A20 SoM from In-Circuit: http://wiki.in-circuit.de/index.php5?title=ICnova_A20_SODIMM http://linux-sunxi.org/In-Circuit_ICnova_A20 This patch

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v4] nios2: convert dma_alloc_coherent to use malloc_cache_aligned

Hi Albert, On 10/19/2015 01:52 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: Not sure I'm getting this, so for my own education: what prevents from invalidating the cache, or IOW, what would happen if it was invalidated at this point rather than flushed? This is a hardware limitation. The nios2 cpu with 4 bytes

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 00/21] sf: Tunning spi-flash layer

Hi Simon, On 19 October 2015 at 01:57, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Jagan, > > On 12 October 2015 at 09:00, Jagan Teki wrote: >> Previous version link: >> http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/233262 >> >> spi-flash layer need to tune a lot

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 2/2] arm: fix compile warnings when semihosting is enabled on ARMv7M target.

On 19.10.2015 09:06, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: Hello Vadzim, On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 00:13:29 +0300, Vadzim Dambrouski wrote: Signed-off-by: Vadzim Dambrouski --- arch/arm/lib/semihosting.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v4] nios2: convert dma_alloc_coherent to use malloc_cache_aligned

Hello Thomas, On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 16:18:06 +0800, Thomas Chou wrote: > Hi Albert, > > On 10/19/2015 01:52 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > > Not sure I'm getting this, so for my own education: what prevents from > > invalidating the cache, or IOW, what would happen if it was

Re: [U-Boot] [ELCE2015] Question about schedule

Hi Bin, > Hi Lukasz, > > On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 7:17 PM, Lukasz Majewski > wrote: > > Hi Bin, > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 6:34 AM, Tom Rini > >> wrote: > >> > On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 10:38:50AM +0200, Lukasz Majewski wrote: > >> >

Re: [U-Boot] [ELCE2015] Question about schedule

Hi Lukasz, On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 4:36 PM, Lukasz Majewski wrote: > Hi Bin, > >> Hi Lukasz, >> >> On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 7:17 PM, Lukasz Majewski >> wrote: >> > Hi Bin, >> > >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 6:34 AM, Tom Rini

Re: [U-Boot] [ELCE2015] Question about schedule

Hi, On 19 October 2015 at 03:17, Bin Meng wrote: > Hi Lukasz, > > On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 4:36 PM, Lukasz Majewski > wrote: >> Hi Bin, >> >>> Hi Lukasz, >>> >>> On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 7:17 PM, Lukasz Majewski >>> wrote: >>>

Re: [U-Boot] Porting UBI fixes (specially fastmap's) to U-Boot

On 19 October 2015 at 02:17, Heiko Schocher wrote: > Hello Ezequiel, > > Am 17.10.2015 um 20:07 schrieb Ezequiel Garcia: >> >> Hi Heiko, >> >> On 9 October 2015 at 09:30, Heiko Schocher wrote: >> [..] >>> >>> >>> >>> I just updated the "ubi_sync_with_linux" branch on

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/3] x86: Added support for Advantech SOM-6896

Hi George, On 19 October 2015 at 08:29, George McCollister wrote: > Simon, > > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 8:25 AM, Simon Glass wrote: >> Hi Bin, >> >> On Monday, 12 October 2015, Bin Meng wrote: >>> >>> Hi George, >>> >>> On Tue,

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3] ARM: relocate: fix hang when CONFIG_ARMV7_SECURE_BASE

> -Original Message- > From: Peng Fan [mailto:b51...@freescale.com] > Sent: Monday, October 19, 2015 7:47 AM > To: Albert ARIBAUD > Cc: Li Frank-B20596 ; lzn...@gmail.com; u- > b...@lists.denx.de; sba...@denx.de; Estevam Fabio-R49496 >

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] configs: ls1021atwr: Enable ID EEPROM for SD boot

On 10/19/2015 04:14 AM, Sinan Akman wrote: > >Hi Yuan > > On 19/10/15 05:21 AM, Yao Yuan wrote: >> Hi Sinan Akman, >> >> Yes, I mean the Rev 1.0 silicon. >> Sorry, I can't guarantee that there aren't any boards with Rev1.0 silicon >> are in user's hands. >> Because we have also delivery

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 2/3] scrapyard: Add lines for recently removed ARM boards

On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 04:44:59PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > 2015-10-18 3:58 GMT+09:00 Simon Glass : > > A lot of boards were recently removed. Add them to the scrapyard. > > > > Signed-off-by: Simon Glass > > --- > > > > Changes in v2: None > > > >

[U-Boot] [PATCH] fill_scrapyard.py: Pass a directory to tempfile.mkstemp()

In some cases os.rename() may later fail due to "Cross-device link" issues. The easy way to deal with this is to simply make our temporary file here as well rather than TMPDIR. Cc: Masahiro Yamada Signed-off-by: Tom Rini ---

Re: [U-Boot] Remove sparc archiecture?

Hallo Daniel, > -Original Message- > From: Daniel Hellstrom [mailto:dan...@gaisler.com] > Sent: 18 October 2015 11:30 PM > To: Masahiro Yamada > Subject: Re: [U-Boot] Remove sparc archiecture? > > On 10/18/2015 05:20 PM, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > > (+CC

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/3] x86: Added support for Advantech SOM-6896

Simon, On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 8:25 AM, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Bin, > > On Monday, 12 October 2015, Bin Meng wrote: >> >> Hi George, >> >> On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 10:52 AM, George McCollister >> wrote: >> > On Mon, Oct 12,

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/3] Sort README.scrapyard

On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 04:40:55PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > Hi Simon, > > 2015-10-18 3:58 GMT+09:00 Simon Glass : > > Sort this by board name to make it easier to find boards. > > > > Signed-off-by: Simon Glass > > --- > > > > Changes in v2: > > -

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/3] gpt: add optional parameter guid in gpt command

2015-10-15 23:46 GMT+02:00 Tom Rini : > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 03:58:24PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 9:23 AM, Patrick Delaunay > > wrote: > > > code under flag CONFIG_PARTITION_TYPE_GUID > > > add parameter guid to

[U-Boot] [PATCH] Revert "arm: Remove d2net_v2 defconfig file"

Upon further review when populating README.scrapyard, d2net_v2 is a variant on net2big_v2 and not just an orphan config. To help in the future also add this to board/LaCie/net2big_v2/MAINTAINERS which needed a little consolidation anyhow. This reverts commit

Re: [U-Boot] Porting UBI fixes (specially fastmap's) to U-Boot

Hello Ezequiel, Am 19.10.2015 um 15:47 schrieb Ezequiel Garcia: On 19 October 2015 at 02:17, Heiko Schocher wrote: Hello Ezequiel, Am 17.10.2015 um 20:07 schrieb Ezequiel Garcia: Hi Heiko, On 9 October 2015 at 09:30, Heiko Schocher wrote: [..] I just

Re: [U-Boot] Remove sparc archiecture?

> -Original Message- > From: Tom Rini [mailto:tr...@konsulko.com] > Sent: 19 October 2015 05:47 PM > To: Francois Retief > Subject: Re: [U-Boot] Remove sparc archiecture? > > On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 02:54:57PM +, Francois Retief wrote: > > Hallo Daniel, > > >

Re: [U-Boot] Remove sparc archiecture?

On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 02:54:57PM +, Francois Retief wrote: > Hallo Daniel, > > > -Original Message- > > From: Daniel Hellstrom [mailto:dan...@gaisler.com] > > Sent: 18 October 2015 11:30 PM > > To: Masahiro Yamada > > Subject: Re: [U-Boot] Remove

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: add support for semihosting for ARMv7M targets

On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 09:12:25AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 11:45 AM, Vadzim Dambrouski wrote: > > On 18.10.2015 12:20, Linus Walleij wrote: > >> Hey, cool. Technically the (ulong) typecasts should be another patch > > > > Sorry about that, this is

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3] sf: Add dm_spi_flash_probe

Updated dm-spi-flash probe using dm_spi_flash_probe. Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki Cc: Simon Glass --- common/cmd_sf.c | 23 --- drivers/mtd/spi/sf-uclass.c | 27 ++- include/spi_flash.h | 5

[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/3] sf: spi_flash_probe for both dm/non-dm

Let's use spi_flash_probe for dm and no-dm spi-flash and make respective function definations separately. Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki Cc: Simon Glass --- common/cmd_sf.c | 19 ++- drivers/mtd/spi/sf-uclass.c | 17

[U-Boot] [PATCH 3/3] sf: Remove spi_flash_remove

Use direct call to device_remove instead of exctra spi_flash_remove defination. Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki Cc: Simon Glass --- drivers/mtd/spi/sf-uclass.c | 7 +-- include/spi_flash.h | 2 -- 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 8 deletions(-)

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] Tegra: T210: Add QSPI driver

On 10/16/2015 04:23 PM, Tom Warren wrote: This is the normal Tegra SPI driver modified to work with the QSPI controller in Tegra210. It does not do 2x/4x transfers or any other QSPI protocol. I've just realized we don't have a binding document for QSPI. I believe we need to get one into the

Re: [U-Boot] Building for several archs

On 10/19/2015 02:17 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote: > Hi, > > I am working on a patch series that I need to test across several > architectures (Need to build all the boards that select > CONFIG_SPI_FLASH_STMICRO). > > I started trying to accomplish this task with buildman and it failed > to build.

Re: [U-Boot] Building for several archs

On 10/19/2015 02:27 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote: > On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 7:21 PM, York Sun wrote: >> On 10/19/2015 02:17 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I am working on a patch series that I need to test across several >>> architectures (Need to build all the

  1   2   >