Add a new 'sf mmap' function to show the address of a SPI offset, if the
hardware supports it. This is useful on x86 systems.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass
---
(no changes since v4)
Changes in v4:
- Drop patches previously applied
- Fix succeded typo
Changes in v3:
- Add configuration and return
This little series adds documentation and a few other tidy-ups to the
'sf' command.
It also provides a way to access memory-mapped SPI via the command line.
NOTE: I am resending this as I didn't get a response to the question on
the review. I suggest we apply it as is unless there is a better
On Fri, 3 Dec 2021 at 15:09, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
>
> Hi Simon,
>
> On Fri, Dec 03, 2021 at 01:13:15PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> > Hi Vladimir,
> >
> > On Thu, 2 Dec 2021 at 07:54, Vladimir Oltean
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Now that all in-tree boards have been converted to the compatible
> > >
Hi Heinrich,
On Fri, 3 Dec 2021 at 13:28, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
>
> On 12/3/21 9:13 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
> > Hi Heinrich,
> >
> > On Fri, 3 Dec 2021 at 06:09, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> >>
> >> On 12/3/21 13:34, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> >>> On 12/2/21 16:58, Simon Glass wrote:
>
Hi Tom,
On Fri, 3 Dec 2021 at 13:43, Tom Rini wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 02, 2021 at 07:03:30PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> > Hi Andre,
> >
> > On Thu, 2 Dec 2021 at 18:59, Andre Przywara wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, 2 Dec 2021 13:34:07 -0500
> > > Tom Rini wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > > On
Hi Tom,
On Fri, 3 Dec 2021 at 12:25, Tom Rini wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 03, 2021 at 09:45:12AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> > is generallyHi Tom,
> >
> > On Fri, 3 Dec 2021 at 09:31, Tom Rini wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Dec 03, 2021 at 09:18:27AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> > > > Hi Tom,
> > > >
>
Hi Simon,
On Fri, Dec 03, 2021 at 01:13:15PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Vladimir,
>
> On Thu, 2 Dec 2021 at 07:54, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> >
> > Now that all in-tree boards have been converted to the compatible
> > strings from Linux, delete the support for the ad-hoc "pcf2127-rtc" one.
>
On Thu, Dec 02, 2021 at 07:03:30PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Andre,
>
> On Thu, 2 Dec 2021 at 18:59, Andre Przywara wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 2 Dec 2021 13:34:07 -0500
> > Tom Rini wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > > On Thu, Dec 02, 2021 at 11:17:38AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> > > > Hi Tom,
> > >
On Fri, Dec 03, 2021 at 01:13:12PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Dec 2021 at 00:55, Andy Shevchenko
> wrote:
> > On Friday, December 3, 2021, Simon Glass wrote:
> >> On Tue, 30 Nov 2021 at 12:04, Andy Shevchenko
> >> wrote:
...
> >> This look useful, but we cannot rely on 'srcdir'
On 12/3/21 9:13 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Heinrich,
On Fri, 3 Dec 2021 at 06:09, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
On 12/3/21 13:34, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
On 12/2/21 16:58, Simon Glass wrote:
At present some of the ideas and techniques behind devicetree in U-Boot
are assumed, implied or
Le ven. 3 déc. 2021 à 21:14, Simon Glass a écrit :
> Hi François,
>
> On Fri, 3 Dec 2021 at 10:03, François Ozog
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, 3 Dec 2021 at 17:04, Simon Glass wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Tom,
> >>
> >> On Fri, 3 Dec 2021 at 05:14, Tom Rini wrote:
> >> >
> >> > On Thu, Dec 02, 2021
On Fri, Dec 03, 2021 at 01:14:04PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi François,
>
> On Fri, 3 Dec 2021 at 10:03, François Ozog wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, 3 Dec 2021 at 17:04, Simon Glass wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Tom,
> >>
> >> On Fri, 3 Dec 2021 at 05:14, Tom Rini wrote:
> >> >
> >> > On Thu, Dec
Hi François,
On Fri, 3 Dec 2021 at 10:03, François Ozog wrote:
>
>
>
> On Fri, 3 Dec 2021 at 17:04, Simon Glass wrote:
>>
>> Hi Tom,
>>
>> On Fri, 3 Dec 2021 at 05:14, Tom Rini wrote:
>> >
>> > On Thu, Dec 02, 2021 at 12:23:10PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
>> > > Hi François,
>> > >
>> > > On
Hi Heinrich,
On Fri, 3 Dec 2021 at 06:09, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
>
> On 12/3/21 13:34, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> > On 12/2/21 16:58, Simon Glass wrote:
> >> At present some of the ideas and techniques behind devicetree in U-Boot
> >> are assumed, implied or unsaid. Add some documentation
Hi Peter,
On Fri, 3 Dec 2021 at 05:20, Peter Robinson wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 3, 2021 at 3:32 AM Simon Glass wrote:
> >
> > Hi Peter,
> >
> > On Wed, 1 Dec 2021 at 07:23, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 5:39 PM Alper Nebi Yasak
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I have
Hi Peter,
Taking another look at https://github.com/raspberrypi/firmware.git I
see that the README says that the .dtb files are build from Linux. So
it seems I can simply grab them from there.
Regards,
Simon
On Fri, 3 Dec 2021 at 05:16, Peter Robinson wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 2, 2021 at 6:26 PM
Hi Vladimir,
On Thu, 2 Dec 2021 at 07:54, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
>
> Now that all in-tree boards have been converted to the compatible
> strings from Linux, delete the support for the ad-hoc "pcf2127-rtc" one.
>
> Cc: Simon Glass
> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean
> ---
> drivers/rtc/pcf2127.c
On Thu, 2 Dec 2021 at 07:54, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
>
> Allow this driver to be used by boards which inherit their device trees
> from Linux. Compatibility is temporarily retained with the old
> compatible string which is U-Boot specific, and will be removed after a
> few changes.
>
> Cc: Simon
Hi Andy,
On Fri, 3 Dec 2021 at 00:55, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>
>
>
> On Friday, December 3, 2021, Simon Glass wrote:
>>
>> Hi Andy,
>>
>> On Tue, 30 Nov 2021 at 12:04, Andy Shevchenko
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Importing libraries in Python caches the bytecode by default.
>> > Since we run scripts in
Hi Tom,
On Fri, 3 Dec 2021 at 09:05, Tom Rini wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 03, 2021 at 08:47:55AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> > Hi Tom,
> >
> > On Fri, 3 Dec 2021 at 08:00, Tom Rini wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Dec 02, 2021 at 07:26:21PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> > >
> > > > Coreboot supports U-Boot
On Fri, Dec 03, 2021 at 09:45:12AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> is generallyHi Tom,
>
> On Fri, 3 Dec 2021 at 09:31, Tom Rini wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 03, 2021 at 09:18:27AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> > > Hi Tom,
> > >
> > > On Fri, 3 Dec 2021 at 08:57, Tom Rini wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On
On Fri, Dec 03, 2021 at 09:17:20AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> On Fri, 3 Dec 2021 at 09:02, Tom Rini wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 03, 2021 at 08:52:38AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> >
> > > Add a means of testing a coreboot + U-Boot build using qemu.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Simon
Changes to the am33xx device (33e9021a) trees have been merged in from
the upstream linux kernel which now means the device tree uses the new
pins format (as of 5.10) where the confinguration can be stores as a
separate configuration value and pin mux mode which are then OR'd
together.
This patch
On Fri, 3 Dec 2021 at 17:04, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> On Fri, 3 Dec 2021 at 05:14, Tom Rini wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 02, 2021 at 12:23:10PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> > > Hi François,
> > >
> > > On Thu, 2 Dec 2021 at 11:44, François Ozog
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi Simon
> > > >
>
Hi, Simon!
On 03.12.21 18:23, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Oleksandr,
>
> On Thu, 2 Dec 2021 at 22:41, Oleksandr Andrushchenko
> wrote:
>> Hi, Simon!
>>
>> On 02.12.21 19:57, Simon Glass wrote:
>>> Hi Oleksandr,
>>>
>>> On Thu, 2 Dec 2021 at 10:40, Oleksandr Andrushchenko
>>> wrote:
Hi, Simon!
is generallyHi Tom,
On Fri, 3 Dec 2021 at 09:31, Tom Rini wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 03, 2021 at 09:18:27AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> > Hi Tom,
> >
> > On Fri, 3 Dec 2021 at 08:57, Tom Rini wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Dec 03, 2021 at 08:39:34AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> > > > Hi Tom,
> > > >
>
On 11/25/21 06:44, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
Heinrich,
On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 12:10:32PM +0900, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
On Sat, Nov 20, 2021 at 01:54:30PM +0100, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
Hello Takahiro,
in a prior mail we have discussed the creation of device paths for USB
mass storage
On Fri, Dec 03, 2021 at 09:18:27AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> On Fri, 3 Dec 2021 at 08:57, Tom Rini wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 03, 2021 at 08:39:34AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> > > Hi Tom,
> > >
> > > On Fri, 3 Dec 2021 at 07:55, Tom Rini wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Dec 02,
Hi Angus,
On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 2:40 PM Angus Ainslie wrote:
> Are there binman updates for the imx8mq_evk ?
Yes, Andrey has sent the following patch:
https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2021-December/468983.html
Hi Andrey,
On Fri, Dec 3, 2021 at 1:18 PM Andrey Zhizhikin
wrote:
>
> Currently i.MX8MQ EVK board still targeting the old image generation
> approach for image generation, which relies on the FIT generator that
> has been dropped from the tree.
>
> Switch the board to use binman instead, which
Hi Oleksandr,
On Thu, 2 Dec 2021 at 22:41, Oleksandr Andrushchenko
wrote:
>
> Hi, Simon!
>
> On 02.12.21 19:57, Simon Glass wrote:
> > Hi Oleksandr,
> >
> > On Thu, 2 Dec 2021 at 10:40, Oleksandr Andrushchenko
> > wrote:
> >> Hi, Simon!
> >>
> >> Sorry for being late to the party
> >>
> >> On
Hi Tom,
On Fri, 3 Dec 2021 at 08:57, Tom Rini wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 03, 2021 at 08:39:34AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> > Hi Tom,
> >
> > On Fri, 3 Dec 2021 at 07:55, Tom Rini wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Dec 02, 2021 at 08:58:54AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> > >
> > > > With Ilias' efforts we
Currently i.MX8MQ EVK board still targeting the old image generation
approach for image generation, which relies on the FIT generator that
has been dropped from the tree.
Switch the board to use binman instead, which is a standard image
generator now.
Update board documentation to correct build
Hi Tom,
On Fri, 3 Dec 2021 at 09:02, Tom Rini wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 03, 2021 at 08:52:38AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
>
> > Add a means of testing a coreboot + U-Boot build using qemu.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Simon Glass
> > ---
> > As to what to do with people's labs, I think applying these
On 12/3/21 08:16, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
Heinrich,
On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 12:01:27PM +0900, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 01:02:55AM +0100, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
On 11/16/21 00:51, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
Is the patch good enough to include in the series?
If not, you
On Fri, Dec 03, 2021 at 08:47:55AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> On Fri, 3 Dec 2021 at 08:00, Tom Rini wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 02, 2021 at 07:26:21PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> >
> > > Coreboot supports U-Boot as a payload and this recently got a bit of a
> > > facelist. Add a test
Hi Tom,
On Fri, 3 Dec 2021 at 05:14, Tom Rini wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 02, 2021 at 12:23:10PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> > Hi François,
> >
> > On Thu, 2 Dec 2021 at 11:44, François Ozog wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Simon
> > >
> > > On Thu, 2 Dec 2021 at 19:29, Simon Glass wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Hi
On Fri, Dec 03, 2021 at 08:52:38AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> Add a means of testing a coreboot + U-Boot build using qemu.
>
> Signed-off-by: Simon Glass
> ---
> As to what to do with people's labs, I think applying these patches does
> encourage them and provide people with examples. Having
On 12/3/21 15:46, Alexander Dahl wrote:
Literally adhering to the docs gave this wrong output:
U-Boot> setenv fdtaddr 0x87f0
U-Boot> fdtaddr $fdtaddr
Unknown command 'fdtaddr' - try 'help'
Fixes: d80162cfc559 ("doc: Document how to apply fdt overlays")
Signed-off-by:
Hello Fabio,
> -Original Message-
> From: Fabio Estevam
> Sent: Friday, December 3, 2021 4:54 PM
> To: ZHIZHIKIN Andrey
> Cc: U-Boot-Denx ; Stefano Babic ;
> dl-uboot-
> imx ; Peng Fan ; Heiko Schocher
> ; Teresa Remmet ; Jagan Teki
> ; Marcel Ziswiler ;
> Ilko
> Iliev ; Heinrich
On Fri, Dec 03, 2021 at 08:39:34AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> On Fri, 3 Dec 2021 at 07:55, Tom Rini wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 02, 2021 at 08:58:54AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> >
> > > With Ilias' efforts we have dropped OF_PRIOR_STAGE and OF_HOSTFILE so
> > > there are only three
Hi Andrey,
Thanks for the patch.
On Fri, Dec 3, 2021 at 12:30 PM Andrey Zhizhikin
wrote:
> -Burn the flash.bin to MicroSD card offset 33KB:
> +Burn the flash.bin (offset 33KB) and u-boot.itb (offset 384KB) to MicroSD
> card:
Could you please use the single flash.bin approach here too?
Add a means of testing a coreboot + U-Boot build using qemu.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass
---
As to what to do with people's labs, I think applying these patches does
encourage them and provide people with examples. Having 'no mainline' for
these is going to be an impediment I think.
Changes in
Hi Tom,
On Fri, 3 Dec 2021 at 08:00, Tom Rini wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 02, 2021 at 07:26:21PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
>
> > Coreboot supports U-Boot as a payload and this recently got a bit of a
> > facelist. Add a test for this.
> >
> > For now this uses a binary build of coreboot (v4.15).
Hi Tom,
On Fri, 3 Dec 2021 at 08:14, Tom Rini wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 02, 2021 at 03:55:03PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
>
> [snip]
> > So now we find out the full horror of the fragmented mess that things
> > are to become. No way does this make sense.
> >
> > It is already too hard to build
Hi Tom,
On Fri, 3 Dec 2021 at 07:55, Tom Rini wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 02, 2021 at 08:58:54AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
>
> > With Ilias' efforts we have dropped OF_PRIOR_STAGE and OF_HOSTFILE so
> > there are only three ways to obtain a devicetree:
> >
> >- OF_SEPARATE - the normal way, where
Currently i.MX8MQ EVK board still targeting the old image generation
approach for image generation, which relies on the FIT generator that
has been dropped from the tree.
Switch the board to use binman instead, which is a standard image
generator now.
Update board documentation to correct build
On Thu, Dec 02, 2021 at 03:55:03PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
[snip]
> So now we find out the full horror of the fragmented mess that things
> are to become. No way does this make sense.
>
> It is already too hard to build things. Just look at the meson/binman
> series I sent last week. We need
Hi Tom,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > This is the part that I too am still unhappy about. I do not
> > > > > > > > want
> > > > > > > > reference or fake or whatever device trees in the U-Boot source
> > > > > > > > tree.
> > > > > > > > We should be able to _remove_ the ones we have, that
On Thu, Dec 02, 2021 at 07:26:21PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> Coreboot supports U-Boot as a payload and this recently got a bit of a
> facelist. Add a test for this.
>
> For now this uses a binary build of coreboot (v4.15). Future work could
> potentially build it from source, but we need to
On Thu, Dec 02, 2021 at 08:58:54AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> With Ilias' efforts we have dropped OF_PRIOR_STAGE and OF_HOSTFILE so
> there are only three ways to obtain a devicetree:
>
>- OF_SEPARATE - the normal way, where the devicetree is built and
> appended to U-Boot
>-
Literally adhering to the docs gave this wrong output:
U-Boot> setenv fdtaddr 0x87f0
U-Boot> fdtaddr $fdtaddr
Unknown command 'fdtaddr' - try 'help'
Fixes: d80162cfc559 ("doc: Document how to apply fdt overlays")
Signed-off-by: Alexander Dahl
---
doc/usage/fdt_overlays.rst | 2
On Fri, Dec 03, 2021 at 04:30:40PM +0200, Ilias Apalodimas wrote:
> Hi Heinrich,
>
> On Fri, Dec 03, 2021 at 02:59:44PM +0100, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> > On 12/3/21 11:27, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > > > Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2021 09:50:44 +0200
> > > > From: Ilias Apalodimas
> > > >
> > > > Hi
Hi Heinrich,
On Fri, Dec 03, 2021 at 02:59:44PM +0100, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> On 12/3/21 11:27, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > > Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2021 09:50:44 +0200
> > > From: Ilias Apalodimas
> > >
> > > Hi Mark,
> > >
> > > > > > > >
> > >
> > > [...]
> > >
> > > > > > > > Changes in
On Thu, Dec 02, 2021 at 07:05:47PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> Add a means of testing a coreboot + U-Boot build using qemu.
>
> Signed-off-by: Simon Glass
> ---
>
> bin/ellesmere/conf.coreboot_qemu | 1 +
> bin/travis-ci/conf.coreboot_qemu | 28
> 2 files
On 12/3/21 11:27, Mark Kettenis wrote:
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2021 09:50:44 +0200
From: Ilias Apalodimas
Hi Mark,
[...]
Changes in v6:
- Fix description of OF_BOARD so it refers just to the current state
- Explain that the 'two devicetrees' refers to two *control* devicetrees
- Expand the
On 12/3/21 13:34, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
On 12/2/21 16:58, Simon Glass wrote:
At present some of the ideas and techniques behind devicetree in U-Boot
are assumed, implied or unsaid. Add some documentation to cover how
devicetree is build, how it can be modified and the rules about using
the
On 12/2/21 20:56, Ovidiu Panait wrote:
The xilinx board_fdt_blob_setup() implementation makes use of
XILINX_OF_BOARD_DTB_ADDR, but no default value is currently defined for
microblaze. Add one so that microblaze could also work with
CONFIG_OF_SEPARATE.
Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait
---
On 12/2/21 16:58, Simon Glass wrote:
At present some of the ideas and techniques behind devicetree in U-Boot
are assumed, implied or unsaid. Add some documentation to cover how
devicetree is build, how it can be modified and the rules about using
the various CONFIG_OF_... options.
On Fri, Dec 3, 2021 at 3:32 AM Simon Glass wrote:
>
> Hi Peter,
>
> On Wed, 1 Dec 2021 at 07:23, Peter Robinson wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 5:39 PM Alper Nebi Yasak
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > I have recently started testing booting U-Boot from SPI on my gru-kevin
> > > (as opposed to
On Thu, Dec 2, 2021 at 6:26 PM Simon Glass wrote:
>
> Hi Mark,
>
> On Thu, 2 Dec 2021 at 10:34, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> >
> > > From: Simon Glass
> > > Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2021 08:59:01 -0700
> > >
> > > Add this file, obtained from the Raspbian boot disk, so there is a
> > > reference devicetree
On Thu, Dec 02, 2021 at 12:23:10PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi François,
>
> On Thu, 2 Dec 2021 at 11:44, François Ozog wrote:
> >
> > Hi Simon
> >
> > On Thu, 2 Dec 2021 at 19:29, Simon Glass wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi François,
> >>
> >> On Thu, 2 Dec 2021 at 11:17, François Ozog
> >> wrote:
>
Hi Simon,
Le 25/11/2021 à 01:13, Simon Glass a écrit :
Hi Philippe,
On Wed, 17 Nov 2021 at 10:52, Philippe Reynes
wrote:
This commit enhances mkimage to update the node
/image/pre-load/sig with the public key.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Reynes
---
include/image.h| 15 ++
> Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2021 09:50:44 +0200
> From: Ilias Apalodimas
>
> Hi Mark,
>
> > > > > >
>
> [...]
>
> > > > > > Changes in v6:
> > > > > > - Fix description of OF_BOARD so it refers just to the current state
> > > > > > - Explain that the 'two devicetrees' refers to two *control*
> > > >
On Fri, 2021-11-26 at 12:44 -0500, Sean Anderson wrote:
> On 11/18/21 8:35 PM, Weijie Gao wrote:
> > This patch adds a clock driver for MediaTek MT7621 SoC.
> > This driver provides clock gate control as well as getting clock
> > frequency
> > for CPU/SYS/XTAL and some peripherals.
> >
> >
Hi Priyanka,
On Thu, Dec 02, 2021 at 04:53:54PM +0200, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> The changes were intended to be minimal, but unfortunately I discovered
> some other stuff as well:
> - we need to make some changes to the compatible strings of RTC devices
> and I2C muxes. This has ramifications
On 12/2/21 17:50, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Heinrich,
On Thu, 2 Dec 2021 at 09:47, Heinrich Schuchardt
wrote:
On 12/2/21 16:58, Simon Glass wrote:
With Ilias' efforts we have dropped OF_PRIOR_STAGE and OF_HOSTFILE so
there are only three ways to obtain a devicetree:
- OF_SEPARATE - the
Populate mtd->dev with flash_info->dev which allows to get
full mtd information using the "mtd list" command.
Before, "mtd list" command returns :
List of MTD devices:
* nor0
- type: NOR flash
- block size: 0x4 bytes
- min I/O: 0x1 bytes
- 0x-0x0400 : "nor0"
After
Hi, Alex and Abder,
Thank you for the comments.
Those will be a good hint for me (especially CONFIG_SPL_RAM_SUPPORT , using FIT
image etc..) in reading the document and doing the experiment later.
Best regards
Chan
> -Original Message-
> From: Abder
> Sent: Wednesday, December 1, 2021
On Thu, Dec 02, 2021 at 05:56:38PM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> The part that Francesco quoted:
>
> "A Precharge All command must be issued prior to the
> MRW command to ensure robust DDR initialization. This
> command is required to be issued to both chip selects if two
> chip selects are
Hello Fabio and Michael,
On Thu, Dec 02, 2021 at 09:36:44PM +0100, Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 2, 2021 at 9:14 PM Fabio Estevam wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 2, 2021 at 1:14 PM Francesco Dolcini
> > wrote:
> > > I'm a little bit puzzled at the moment, according to the iMX6
On 01/12/2021 22:10, Sean Anderson wrote:
On 12/1/21 3:08 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 02:44:02PM -0500, Sean Anderson wrote:
This xlate function just performs some checking. We can do this in
request() instead and use the default xlate.
Signed-off-by: Sean Anderson
Hi
72 matches
Mail list logo
