Hi Paul,
thanks for contacting us!
On Freitag, 12. Juni 2015, Paul Kocialkowski wrote:
I think a bit more is needed to get truly reproducible builds in U-Boot,
but this is a first good step!
you've seen https://reproducible.debian.net/u-boot ?
I have been thinking about bringing
Hi Paul,
sorry for the late reply.
On Samstag, 13. Juni 2015, Paul Kocialkowski wrote:
you've seen https://reproducible.debian.net/u-boot ?
This seems very minimalistic, but it's good to see U-Boot was given some
attention already!
:-)
but maybe you can explain why u-boot needs more
Hi Paul,
On Sonntag, 19. Juli 2015, Paul Kocialkowski wrote:
sorry for the late reply.
No problem, I haven't kept you or the list posted on this either.
I got a chance to discuss the issue with Lunar during RMLL 2015 and we
came up with a nice way of doing things, using
Hi,
On Sonntag, 19. Juli 2015, Paul Kocialkowski wrote:
I *think* that actually makes u-boot build reproducibly with Debian's
reproducible builds toolchain when SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH is set, but I
haven't tested it fully. I might have missed some other sources of
non-determinism...
We came
Hi Chris,
On Mittwoch, 26. August 2015, Chris Packham wrote:
Just for my own understanding is the reproducible team a u-boot
thing or a debian thing? I'm not really active in any of the debian
projects so maybe someone there should pick this up if it's a debian
thing.
the reproducible team
Hi,
(just stating the (IMHO) obvious hereā¦)
On Dienstag, 25. August 2015, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
There was a proposed patch which only uses the GNU date extensions if
SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH environment variable is set, would this sufficiently
address your concerns, at least for the short term?
Hi,
On Freitag, 28. August 2015, Tom Rini wrote:
Applied to u-boot/master, thanks!
yay, glad to see this thread come to a happy ending, both nicely and quickly!
;-) Thanks to everyone involved!
cheers,
Holger
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
7 matches
Mail list logo