Hi,
On Freitag, 28. August 2015, Tom Rini wrote:
Applied to u-boot/master, thanks!
yay, glad to see this thread come to a happy ending, both nicely and quickly!
;-) Thanks to everyone involved!
cheers,
Holger
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Hi Chris,
On Mittwoch, 26. August 2015, Chris Packham wrote:
Just for my own understanding is the reproducible team a u-boot
thing or a debian thing? I'm not really active in any of the debian
projects so maybe someone there should pick this up if it's a debian
thing.
the reproducible team
Hi,
(just stating the (IMHO) obvious hereā¦)
On Dienstag, 25. August 2015, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
There was a proposed patch which only uses the GNU date extensions if
SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH environment variable is set, would this sufficiently
address your concerns, at least for the short term?
Hi Paul,
sorry for the late reply.
On Samstag, 13. Juni 2015, Paul Kocialkowski wrote:
you've seen https://reproducible.debian.net/u-boot ?
This seems very minimalistic, but it's good to see U-Boot was given some
attention already!
:-)
but maybe you can explain why u-boot needs more
Hi Paul,
On Sonntag, 19. Juli 2015, Paul Kocialkowski wrote:
sorry for the late reply.
No problem, I haven't kept you or the list posted on this either.
I got a chance to discuss the issue with Lunar during RMLL 2015 and we
came up with a nice way of doing things, using
Hi,
On Sonntag, 19. Juli 2015, Paul Kocialkowski wrote:
I *think* that actually makes u-boot build reproducibly with Debian's
reproducible builds toolchain when SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH is set, but I
haven't tested it fully. I might have missed some other sources of
non-determinism...
We came
Hi Paul,
thanks for contacting us!
On Freitag, 12. Juni 2015, Paul Kocialkowski wrote:
I think a bit more is needed to get truly reproducible builds in U-Boot,
but this is a first good step!
you've seen https://reproducible.debian.net/u-boot ?
I have been thinking about bringing
7 matches
Mail list logo