[U-Boot] AT91SAM9260 Ethernet Device

2009-11-30 Thread J.Hwan.Kim
Hi, everyone I'm trying to connect ethernet with AT91SAM9260. My board uses DM9161A as a ethernet transceiver. The u-boot ethernet initialization routine runs auto-negotiation, it works fine. Ethernet controller of AT91SAM9260 (MACB0) receives Auto negotiation completion bit from DM9161A status

Re: [U-Boot] nand_scan() in ARM9 S3C2410

2009-09-21 Thread J.Hwan.Kim
kevin.morf...@fearnside-systems.co.uk wrote: Minkyu Kang wrote: Dear J.Hwan.Kim 2009/9/20 J.Hwan.Kim frog1...@gmail.com: Hi, everyone I'm using u-boot for ARM9 S3C2410. My tool chain is ELDK4.2. I defined configuration CONFIG_NAND_CMD, CONFIG_SYS_MAX_NAND_DEVICE1

[U-Boot] nand_scan() in ARM9 S3C2410

2009-09-19 Thread J.Hwan.Kim
Hi, everyone I'm using u-boot for ARM9 S3C2410. My tool chain is ELDK4.2. I defined configuration CONFIG_NAND_CMD, CONFIG_SYS_MAX_NAND_DEVICE1, and CONFIG_SYS_NAND_BASE 0x4E0C for nand_init(). It works well until the routine reaches nand_scan() which is in nand_base.c When nand_scan()

[U-Boot] Hanging in kmalloc of nand_scan_tail() function

2009-09-17 Thread J.Hwan.Kim
Hi, everyone I'm using U-boot 2009-03. U-boot hangs in nand_init() function. I found the routine kmalloc in nand_scan_tail() cause U-boot reset. int nand_scan_tail(struct mtd_info *mtd) { int i; struct nand_chip *chip = mtd-priv; if (!(chip-options NAND_OWN_BUFFERS)) {

[U-Boot] lowlevel_init.s for ARM920t/S3C2410

2009-09-16 Thread J.Hwan.Kim
Hi, everyone I'm running u-boot (2009.03) in S3C2410 board now. But I have a problem. It seems that bl lowlevel_init routine in ARM920t/start.s is not working. The label, lowlevel_init, is defined as global label in /board/samsung/s3c2410/lowlevel_init.s and is seen system.map file. I think

[U-Boot] ARM920T SMDK2440 support

2009-06-24 Thread J.Hwan.Kim
Hi, everyone Is U-Boot not support ARM920T SMDK2440 board? Regards, J.H.Kim ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

[U-Boot] question on do_bootm()

2009-06-16 Thread J.Hwan.Kim
Hi, everyone I have a question on relocation of boot function table in do_bootm(). The boot function table boot_os[] has a pointer of functions such as do_bootm_linux(). I think the address of the symbol do_bootm_linux has relocated address by linker. But there is address-modifying routine in

[U-Boot] question on relocation of arm920t

2009-06-09 Thread J.Hwan.Kim
Hi, everyone I'm a novice in u-boot. I have a question about relocation of arm920t. As far as I know, the relocation code address is defined at config.mk in board directory. The code is copied to TEXT_BASE in start.S. When the u-boot is compiled and linked, it seems that the code address is set