Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] i.MX6: nand: add nandbcb command for imx

On Mon, 10 Jun 2019, Stefano Babic wrote: On 10/06/19 19:35, Sergey Kubushyn wrote: On Mon, 10 Jun 2019, Stefano Babic wrote: Hi Jagan, Shyam, [dd] Thanks for this work - this is still missing in current U-Boot. I will merge this for the upcoming release - letting this in, we could win

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] i.MX6: nand: add nandbcb command for imx

On Mon, 10 Jun 2019, Stefano Babic wrote: Hi Jagan, Shyam, [dd] Thanks for this work - this is still missing in current U-Boot. I will merge this for the upcoming release - letting this in, we could win some more testers helping to adjust if there are some issues. Thanks. Looks like it is

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] dm: Add a No-op uclass

On Fri, 22 Mar 2019, Jean-Jacques Hiblot wrote: It is probably the right solution, just have one suggestion -- why wouldn't we make it UCLASS_GLUE instead? NOP is too generic, IMHO and it is just NOP. There is definitely a place for such thing but we might want to add some specific functionality

[U-Boot] UCLASS_MISC bug

I would like to point that this was not a very good idea: === Cut === --- uboot-imx-next/drivers/misc/misc-uclass.c 2018-12-20 20:35:22.505180339 -0800 +++ u-boot-imx/drivers/misc/misc-uclass.c 2019-03-13 11:50:19.408982814 -0700 @@ -68,4 +68,7 @@ int misc_set_enabled(struct udevice

Re: [U-Boot] imx8mq-evk: Outbound network packets lost

On Fri, 1 Feb 2019, Chris Spencer wrote: On Fri, 1 Feb 2019 at 16:10, Sergey Kubushyn wrote: Turns out there's already a patch to add the driver as part of the i.MX8MM patch series. [1] Go figure. What the fcuk is i.MX8MM? Are they going to do anything with their i.MX8MQ documentation

Re: [U-Boot] imx8mq-evk: Outbound network packets lost

On Fri, 1 Feb 2019, Chris Spencer wrote: On Thu, 31 Jan 2019 at 18:43, Sergey Kubushyn wrote: OK, it worked. The second patch is irrelevant for me because I'm working on a custom device, not MCIMX8M-EVK (I don't have that, just using its schematic from time to time as reference to its drivers

Re: [U-Boot] imx8mq-evk: Outbound network packets lost

On Thu, 31 Jan 2019, Chris Spencer wrote: On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 at 00:44, Sergey Kubushyn wrote: OK, I've got it working. The problem was DM FEC driver does _NOT_ do pin muxing and FEC pins in i.MX8MQ come up as GPIOs after rest so no wonder it can't talk to the PHY or whatever else. I don't

Re: [U-Boot] imx8mq-evk: Outbound network packets lost

On Sat, 26 Jan 2019, Chris Spencer wrote: On Sat, 26 Jan 2019 at 01:14, Sergey Kubushyn wrote: Thanks for a reply. The problem here is not with leftover descriptors -- it is MDIO bus not working at all. It is either bogus speed/clock in DM mode or something else that I haven't found yet

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC 1/3] dm: blk: add UCLASS_PARTITION

On Tue, 29 Jan 2019, Alexander Graf wrote: On 01/29/2019 04:17 AM, Sergey Kubushyn wrote: On Tue, 29 Jan 2019, AKASHI Takahiro wrote: My $.25 -- IMHO, block device partitions in Device Tree is _NOT_ a very good idea. This is about device model, not device tree :). Device trees indeed

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC 1/3] dm: blk: add UCLASS_PARTITION

On Tue, 29 Jan 2019, AKASHI Takahiro wrote: My $.25 -- IMHO, block device partitions in Device Tree is _NOT_ a very good idea. What if one decided to re-partition his drive? Or just use bigger or smaller drive? Would he has to re-write DTS file and re-compile everything? And such change is not

Re: [U-Boot] imx8mq-evk: Outbound network packets lost

ternal pins.) Damn, Freescale was pretty decent on documentation but NXP is absolute disaster... On Thu, 24 Jan 2019 at 23:51, Sergey Kubushyn wrote: On Fri, 4 Jan 2019, Chris Spencer wrote: Hi Chris, Did you figure out what was wrong with the PHY always reading zeroes over MDIO? I have exactly same

Re: [U-Boot] i.MX8M layout, rephrased

On Wed, 26 Dec 2018, Fabio Estevam wrote: On Wed, Dec 26, 2018 at 7:18 PM Sergey Kubushyn wrote: OK, so is it going to be IMX8M or MX8M? Peng has already replied. It is going to be IMX8M: http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot/u-boot-imx.git;a=commitdiff;h=3d145ff59d183850f11ba4157f03d05fc2fcb992;hp

Re: [U-Boot] i.MX8M layout, rephrased

On Wed, 26 Dec 2018, Tom Rini wrote: On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 07:14:02PM -0800, Sergey Kubushyn wrote: On Mon, 17 Dec 2018, Sergey Kubushyn wrote: Yet another thought -- maybe it's time to move all 64-bit ARM stuff to its own arch/arm64 as it is in Linux kernel since I don't remember when

Re: [U-Boot] i.MX8M layout, rephrased

On Mon, 17 Dec 2018, Sergey Kubushyn wrote: Yet another thought -- maybe it's time to move all 64-bit ARM stuff to its own arch/arm64 as it is in Linux kernel since I don't remember when? There are quite a few SoCs out there to justify such a move... I'm looking at U-Boot master tree and u

[U-Boot] i.MX8M layout, rephrased

I'm looking at U-Boot master tree and u-boot-imx repository. What we have now is quite a mess for i.MX8M. In master we have the following directories: arch/arm/mach-imx/imx8 arch/arm/mach-imx/mx8m arch/arm/include/asm/arch-imx8 arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx8m In

[U-Boot] Quick question on i.MX8MQ

I'm working on a i.MX8MQ port to our new device that is in very advanced manufacturing stage. It is not a board but a self-contained terminal that is going into production really soon (various molds are being done, mechanical parts, wire harnesses and so on) so it would hardly be of general

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 2/2] arm: i.MX: Add CMD_NANDBCB Kconfig entry

On Wed, 7 Feb 2018, Jagan Teki wrote: Add Kconfig entry for CMD_NANDBCB, and default y on i.MX6 platform with NAND_MXS defined. Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki --- Changes for v2: - New patch arch/arm/mach-imx/Kconfig | 11 +++ 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)

Re: [U-Boot] Swig now required to build U-Boot?

On Fri, 8 Dec 2017, Simon Glass wrote: Hi Stephen, On 8 December 2017 at 16:28, Stephen Warren wrote: Simon, Is it expected that the latest u-boot-dm.git master branch now requires swig? All the non-sandbox builds on my test systems are failing: CHK

Re: [U-Boot] accessing eMMC boot partitions from U-Boot

On Mon, 13 Mar 2017, Stephen Warren wrote: On 03/13/2017 07:08 PM, Sergey Kubushyn wrote: On Mon, 13 Mar 2017, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 03/13/2017 03:34 PM, Tim Harvey wrote: > > Greetings, > > > > I'm working with some boards with eMMC FLASH and underst

Re: [U-Boot] accessing eMMC boot partitions from U-Boot

On Mon, 13 Mar 2017, Stephen Warren wrote: On 03/13/2017 03:34 PM, Tim Harvey wrote: Greetings, I'm working with some boards with eMMC FLASH and understand that I can set the fields of the PARTITION_CONFIG with the 'mmc partconf' command to specify what partition is used for boot. Once I

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v7 18/21] mtd: nand: Kconfig: Add NAND_MXS entry

On Wed, 12 Oct 2016, Jörg Krause wrote: On Sa, 2016-10-08 at 18:00 +0530, Jagan Teki wrote: From: Jagan Teki Added kconfig for NAND_MXS driver. Cc: Scott Wood Cc: Simon Glass Cc: Fabio Estevam Cc:

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1]: filesystems : add "file exists" cmd

On Sat, 8 Oct 2016, Sergey Kubushyn wrote: On Sat, 8 Oct 2016, Tom Rini wrote: On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 12:38:01PM -0700, Sergey Kubushyn wrote: > This adds "file exists" commands to generic FS as well as to FAT, EXT4, > and UBIFS. Also adds "file size" command

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1]: environment in eMMC boot partition

On Sat, 8 Oct 2016, Tom Rini wrote: On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 01:28:07PM -0700, Sergey Kubushyn wrote: This allows to place U-Boot environment into eMMC boot partition thus saving space on user partition for the OS (or whatever.) When booting off of eMMC many (all?) MCUs can use dedicated boot0

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1]: environment in eMMC boot partition

On Sat, 8 Oct 2016, Tom Rini wrote: On Sat, Oct 08, 2016 at 03:41:50PM -0700, Sergey Kubushyn wrote: On Sat, 8 Oct 2016, Tom Rini wrote: On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 01:28:07PM -0700, Sergey Kubushyn wrote: This allows to place U-Boot environment into eMMC boot partition thus saving space

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1]: filesystems : add "file exists" cmd

On Sat, 8 Oct 2016, Tom Rini wrote: On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 12:38:01PM -0700, Sergey Kubushyn wrote: This adds "file exists" commands to generic FS as well as to FAT, EXT4, and UBIFS. Also adds "file size" command to UBIFS. The return value for "file exists&

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2] Add support for eMMC environment in boot partition

fig EMMC_BOOT_ACK bool "Enable ACKs from eMMC when booting off of boot partition" default n === Cut === Signed-off-by: Sergey Kubushyn <k...@koi8.net> Cc: Tom Rini <tr...@konsulko.com> Cc: Pantelis Antoniou <pa...@antoniou-consulting.com> --- common/env_mmc.c

[U-Boot] [PATCH v3] Add nand bootupdate command for i.MX6 and similar platforms

but the only location i.MX6 Boot ROM expects it to be. Signed-off-by: Sergey Kubushyn <k...@koi8.net> Cc: Scott Wood <o...@buserror.net> Cc: Stefano Babic <sba...@denx.de> --- Changes for v3: - Renamed some functions to more appropriate names - Files moved to where they bel

[U-Boot] [PATCH v3] Add nand bootupdate command for i.MX6 and similar platforms

but the only location i.MX6 Boot ROM expects it to be. Signed-off-by: Sergey Kubushyn <k...@koi8.net> Cc: Scott Wood <o...@buserror.net> Cc: Stefano Babic <sba...@denx.de> --- Changes for v3: - Renamed some functions to more appropriate names - Files moved to where they bel

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] Added nand bootupdate command for i.MX6 and similar systems

On Fri, 7 Oct 2016, Fabio Estevam wrote: On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 10:36 PM, Sergey Kubushyn <k...@koi8.net> wrote: OK, it is done against the latest u-boot master as it is stated in that manual on U-Boot patches. I don't know why it fails on u-boot-imx tree. U-Boot master has been pu

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] Added nand bootupdate command for i.MX6 and similar systems

On Fri, 7 Oct 2016, Fabio Estevam wrote: On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 8:30 PM, Sergey Kubushyn <k...@koi8.net> wrote: This is my FOURTH attempt to get it into the main U-Boot tree. I do really hope it would get applied before I retire. No need for such comment in the commit log. Tried to

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2] Added nand bootupdate command for i.MX6 and similar systems

but the only location i.MX6 Boot ROM expects it to be. This is my FOURTH attempt to get it into the main U-Boot tree. I do really hope it would get applied before I retire. Signed-off-by: Sergey Kubushyn <k...@koi8.net> Cc: Scott Wood <o...@buserror.net> Cc: Stefano Babic <sba...@denx.

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1]: add nand_bootupdate for i.MX6 and likes

On Fri, 7 Oct 2016, Scott Wood wrote: On Wed, 2016-10-05 at 12:57 -0700, Sergey Kubushyn wrote: This one adds nand_bootupdate command for i.MX6 and similar MCUs. It generates proper NAND boot structures (FCB, DBBT, etc) and writes those along with U-Boot mx image to where they belong so system

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1]: nand bootupdate for i.MX6 -- REBASED

Here it is agains your latest u-boot-imx master. Won't post that description again to lower the noise level, just a diff itself. Signed-off-by: Sergey Kubushyn <k...@koi8.net> --- arch/arm/include/asm/imx-common/mxs_nand.h | 37 ++ cmd/Kconfig| 10

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1]: add nand_bootupdate for i.MX6 and likes

On Fri, 7 Oct 2016, Stefano Babic wrote: Hi Sergey, On 07/10/2016 17:04, Sergey Kubushyn wrote: Can you please check this (before you retire, of course !) ? What should I use a base? I did my patches against whatever is the main U-Boot git tree (doing git pull befofe generating patches

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1]: add nand_bootupdate for i.MX6 and likes

On Fri, 7 Oct 2016, Stefano Babic wrote: Hi Sergey, On 05/10/2016 21:57, Sergey Kubushyn wrote: This one adds nand_bootupdate command for i.MX6 and similar MCUs. It generates proper NAND boot structures (FCB, DBBT, etc) and writes those along with U-Boot mx image to where they belong so

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1]: environment in eMMC boot partition

fig EMMC_BOOT_ACK bool "Enable ACKs from eMMC when booting off of boot partition" default n === Cut === Signed-off-by: Sergey Kubushyn <k...@koi8.net> --- --- a/common/env_mmc.c +++ b/common/env_mmc.c @@ -68,6 +68,45 @@ int env_init(void) return 0;

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1]: add nand_bootupdate for i.MX6 and likes

but the only location i.MX6 Boot ROM expects it to be. This is my THIRD attempt to get it into the main U-Boot tree. I do really hope it would get applied before I retire. Signed-off-by: Sergey Kubushyn <k...@koi8.net> --- --- a/cmd/Kconfig +++ b/cmd/Kconfig @@ -571,6 +571,16 @@ config CMD_TIME

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1]: filesystems : add "file exists" cmd

e extensively for system setup at manufacturing time and for other purposes (e.g. our Android "recovery" is implemented this way.) Signed-off-by: Sergey Kubushyn <k...@koi8.net> --- --- a/include/fs.h +++ b/include/fs.h @@ -90,6 +90,8 @@ int do_ls(cmd_tbl_t *cmdtp, int flag, int a

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] i.MX6 nand bootupdate, reworked

On Wed, 28 Sep 2016, Jagan Teki wrote: On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 3:14 AM, Sergey Kubushyn <k...@koi8.net> wrote: Here is yet another version, diff made against latest u-boot-imx master. Actual code moved from drivers/mtd/nand to /arch/arm/imx-common, some functions renamed. No other c

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] i.MX6 nand bootupdate, reworked

On Wed, 28 Sep 2016, Jagan Teki wrote: On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 10:04 PM, Jagan Teki <jagannadh.t...@gmail.com> wrote: On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 3:14 AM, Sergey Kubushyn <k...@koi8.net> wrote: Here is yet another version, diff made against latest u-boot-imx master. Actual cod

Re: [U-Boot] A64 fastboot, faster way to compile/test

On Sun, 14 Aug 2016, jonsm...@gmail.com wrote: I'm trying out various versions of the A64 u-boot -- Allwinner lichee, longsleep, apritzel, etc on the Pine64. I can get all of them up to the prompt, but fastboot doesn't work in an of them. There is code from Allwinner in there for implementing

[U-Boot] [PATCH] i.MX6 nand bootupdate, reworked

Here is yet another version, diff made against latest u-boot-imx master. Actual code moved from drivers/mtd/nand to /arch/arm/imx-common, some functions renamed. No other changes. Signed-off-by: Sergey Kubushyn <k...@koi8.net> --- arch/arm/imx-common/Makefile | 3 + ar

[U-Boot] [PATCH] Initial NAND U-Boot update for i.MX6 SOCs

3; } -static uint32_t mxs_nand_mark_bit_offset(struct mtd_info *mtd) +uint32_t mxs_nand_mark_bit_offset(struct mtd_info *mtd) { uint32_t ecc_strength; ecc_strength = mxs_nand_get_ecc_strength(mtd->writesize, mtd->oobsize); diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/mxs_nand_bootupdate.c b/drive

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] i.MX6 nand bootupdate

On Wed, 15 Jun 2016, Stefano Babic wrote: Hi, Hi Sergey, On 14/06/2016 20:32, Sergey Kubushyn wrote: Here is the initial support for writing i.MX6 NAND U-Boot into NAND with all FCB and DBBT stuff as required. This is a very interesting feature missing in U-Boot. Up now we

[U-Boot] [PATCH] i.MX6 nand bootupdate

.MX6DL SoC. Will probably post that board support files later, when config is cleaned up so people could have a working NAND boot DCD portion to be able actually use those braindead SOMs. Signed-off-by: Sergey Kubushyn <k...@koi8.net> --- diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/imx-common/mxs_nand.h b/

[U-Boot] BOOT_DELAY broken

OK, it is broken in last commit. Totally broken. I can NOT get my custom board to stop at all. "CONFIG_BOOTDELAY=3" added to my board defconfig doesn't change anything. Even changing default to 3 from 0 in common/Kconfig doesn't help. Putting "CONFIG_BOOTDELAY 3" in my board config in

[U-Boot] HUSH_PARSER...

I wonder is there any clarity wrt CONFIG_HUSH_PARSER vs CONFIG_SYS_HUSH_PARSER? That stupid definition seems to be constantly oscillating between those two definitions from release to release so one is left with missing scripting every time new version is released... I'm putting both definition

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1] common: fb_nand: won't compile

Somehow this got overlooked when getting rid of nand_info. Small patch, won't affect anything else, no reason to wait for the next cycle. Signed-off-by: Sergey Kubushyn <k...@koi8.net> --- diff --git a/common/fb_nand.c b/common/fb_nand.c index e55ea38..ae34f48 100644 --- a/common/fb_

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1] cmd: bootefi: cosmetic

NAND U-Boot update -- it works here but not ready for a submission yet. Anyway it is for the next cycle, not going to go into this release because it is too big and may affect something else. Also have some thoughts about fastboot (using multiple devices) but this will go into separate email wi

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/5] Update fastboot sparse image handling

On Tue, 7 Jun 2016, Steve Rae wrote: Quick question before diving in -- does anybody work on making fastboot able to flash multiple devices? There are some braindead designs (e.g. Variscite SOMs) that have both eMMC and NAND on board and only able to boot off of NAND. Android FS layout uses

Re: [U-Boot] Problem of git clone with http

On Wed, 27 Apr 2016, Wolfgang Denk wrote: Dear Andreas, In message <20160427144315.gh2...@borg.dal.design.ti.com> you wrote: But i can't pull and fetch anything with http.. ... I was just banging my head not being able to fetch the latest U-Boot stuff, running into the same issue, and

Re: [U-Boot] imx6 devices failing to build with 2016.05

On Wed, 27 Apr 2016, Stefano Babic wrote: Guys, it looks like it is already time to finally get that series of ARM lib patches in. This will occur again and again until it is done. Face the reality -- not everybody uses a special softfloat toolchain just for building U-Boot. And it is simply

Re: [U-Boot] RFC: i.MX6 write U-Boot to NAND

... Will try to submit a patch by the end of week if nothing come into the way. Hi Sergey, Hi Heiko, On 26.04.2016 07:43, Heiko Schocher wrote: add Stefano to Cc as he is the imx6 custodian, Am 25.04.2016 um 22:29 schrieb Sergey Kubushyn: > Hi everybody, > > It looks like using kobs-n

[U-Boot] RFC: i.MX6 write U-Boot to NAND

Hi everybody, It looks like using kobs-ng utility is the only way to make a bootable NAND for i.MX6 and their siblings. There might be other utilities I'm not aware of but that doesn't change anything -- you need Linux (or whatever that utility runs on) running on your board to create and write

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 5/5] lib: Enable private libgcc by default

On Thu, 24 Mar 2016, Tom Rini wrote: On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 08:50:03AM +0100, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: Hello Tom, On Wed, 23 Mar 2016 17:36:17 -0400, Tom Rini wrote: On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 06:08:45PM +0100, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: Hello Tom, On Wed, 23 Mar 2016 09:22:38

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 5/5] lib: Enable private libgcc by default

On Thu, 24 Mar 2016, Marek Vasut wrote: On 03/24/2016 08:08 PM, Sergey Kubushyn wrote: On Thu, 24 Mar 2016, Marek Vasut wrote: On 03/24/2016 07:43 PM, Sergey Kubushyn wrote: On Thu, 24 Mar 2016, Sergey Kubushyn wrote: On Thu, 24 Mar 2016, Marek Vasut wrote: On 03/24/2016 12:54 AM

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 5/5] lib: Enable private libgcc by default

On Thu, 24 Mar 2016, Marek Vasut wrote: On 03/24/2016 07:43 PM, Sergey Kubushyn wrote: On Thu, 24 Mar 2016, Sergey Kubushyn wrote: On Thu, 24 Mar 2016, Marek Vasut wrote: On 03/24/2016 12:54 AM, Sergey Kubushyn wrote: On Thu, 24 Mar 2016, Marek Vasut wrote: On 03/24/2016 12:47 AM

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 5/5] lib: Enable private libgcc by default

On Thu, 24 Mar 2016, Sergey Kubushyn wrote: On Thu, 24 Mar 2016, Marek Vasut wrote: On 03/24/2016 12:54 AM, Sergey Kubushyn wrote: > On Thu, 24 Mar 2016, Marek Vasut wrote: > > > On 03/24/2016 12:47 AM, Sergey Kubushyn wrote: > > > On Thu, 24 Mar 20

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 5/5] lib: Enable private libgcc by default

On Thu, 24 Mar 2016, Marek Vasut wrote: On 03/24/2016 12:54 AM, Sergey Kubushyn wrote: On Thu, 24 Mar 2016, Marek Vasut wrote: On 03/24/2016 12:47 AM, Sergey Kubushyn wrote: On Thu, 24 Mar 2016, Marek Vasut wrote: On 03/24/2016 12:08 AM, Tom Rini wrote: On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 04:02:07PM

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 5/5] lib: Enable private libgcc by default

On Thu, 24 Mar 2016, Marek Vasut wrote: On 03/24/2016 12:54 AM, Sergey Kubushyn wrote: On Thu, 24 Mar 2016, Marek Vasut wrote: On 03/24/2016 12:47 AM, Sergey Kubushyn wrote: On Thu, 24 Mar 2016, Marek Vasut wrote: On 03/24/2016 12:08 AM, Tom Rini wrote: On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 04:02:07PM

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 5/5] lib: Enable private libgcc by default

On Thu, 24 Mar 2016, Marek Vasut wrote: On 03/24/2016 12:47 AM, Sergey Kubushyn wrote: On Thu, 24 Mar 2016, Marek Vasut wrote: On 03/24/2016 12:08 AM, Tom Rini wrote: On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 04:02:07PM -0700, Sergey Kubushyn wrote: On Wed, 23 Mar 2016, Tom Rini wrote: On Wed, Mar 23

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 5/5] lib: Enable private libgcc by default

On Thu, 24 Mar 2016, Marek Vasut wrote: On 03/24/2016 12:08 AM, Tom Rini wrote: On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 04:02:07PM -0700, Sergey Kubushyn wrote: On Wed, 23 Mar 2016, Tom Rini wrote: On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 06:08:45PM +0100, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: Hello Tom, On Wed, 23 Mar 2016 09:22:38

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 5/5] lib: Enable private libgcc by default

On Wed, 23 Mar 2016, Tom Rini wrote: On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 04:02:07PM -0700, Sergey Kubushyn wrote: On Wed, 23 Mar 2016, Tom Rini wrote: On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 06:08:45PM +0100, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: Hello Tom, On Wed, 23 Mar 2016 09:22:38 -0400, Tom Rini <tr...@konsulko.com>

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 5/5] lib: Enable private libgcc by default

On Wed, 23 Mar 2016, Tom Rini wrote: On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 06:08:45PM +0100, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: Hello Tom, On Wed, 23 Mar 2016 09:22:38 -0400, Tom Rini wrote: On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 01:53:35PM +0100, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: Hello Marek, On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 17:15:34

[U-Boot] Build failures with hard float

There are multiple build failures with hard float toolchains caused by switching to 64-bit data. This shows up in drivers/video among others i.e. in ipu_common.c when building for i.MX6 with video enabled. === Cut === arm-linux-gnueabi-ld.bfd: error:

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] schmoogie: fix build error due to removal of forceenv()

On Tue, 5 Oct 2010, Wolfgang Denk wrote: Ack-by: Sergey Kubushyn k...@koi8.net --- commit 6d014adf dropped support for the forceenv() function, but failed to remove references to it from board/davinci/schmoogie/schmoogie.c Replace forceenv() by setenv() and set CONFIG_ENV_OVERWRITE instead

[U-Boot] Would somebody block this please?

It is already 5th or more same spam email in a row. Does anybody care? --- ** * k...@homeKOI8 Net The impossible we do immediately. * * Las Vegas NV, USA Miracles require 24-hour notice. *