[U-Boot] net: fec_mxc: multiple calls to fec_mii_setspeed()

Hello, I just noticed that in fec_mxc.c, fec_mii_setspeed() is called twice if you are calling fecmxc_initialize_multi(), once from fec_get_miibus(), and the other from fec_probe(). Is this intended? If so, would you mind to elaborate a bit? Thanks, -- yashi ___

Re: [U-Boot] imx: get_ticks in syscounter.c get miscompiled by GCC 6

Hi, On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 11:27 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 10:42:44AM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote: >> Patch looks good. Make sure to add your Signed-off-by line, then you >> can send it via git send-email. > > Yes please, thanks! I've sent it to you with my signed-of-by. than

[U-Boot] [PATCH] imx: syscounter: make sure asm is volatile

n timer_init(). [1]: https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2018-March/322062.html Signed-off-by: Yasushi SHOJI Reviewed-by: Fabio Estevam --- arch/arm/mach-imx/syscounter.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/syscounter.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/sy

Re: [U-Boot] imx: get_ticks in syscounter.c get miscompiled by GCC 6

- yashi From 8772a9b5b532da4c1d0656ffa21f324e72d369e8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Yasushi SHOJI Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2018 14:38:05 +0900 Subject: [PATCH] imx: syscounter: make sure asm is volatile Without the volatile attribute, compilers are entitled to optimize out the same asm().

[U-Boot] imx: get_ticks in syscounter.c get miscompiled by GCC 6

Hi, It seems to me that both GCC 6.3 and 6.4 mis-compiles arch/arm/mach-imx/syscounter.c. I'm attaching two files, bad.txt is the original syscounter.c and good.txt is the one with the following patch. diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/syscounter.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/syscounter.c index 9290918dca.

Re: [U-Boot] Removing suzaku board from U-BOOT

Hi Michal, At Mon, 24 Nov 2008 13:31:27 +0100, Michal Simek wrote: > > I am going to redesign microblaze u-boot branch to similar style as is > xilinx ppc platform and I would like to remove suzaku board too because I > don't > have any info if someone use it. > > Is someone who use this board?