[U-Boot] [PATCH] FPU POST: fix warnings when building with 2.18 binutils

2008-12-20 Thread Yuri Tikhonov
the soft-float string from CFLAGS in post/lib_ppc/fpu/Makefile. Signed-off-by: Yuri Tikhonov y...@emcraft.com --- include/post.h| 13 + post/lib_ppc/fpu/20001122-1.c |2 ++ post/lib_ppc/fpu/20010114-2.c |2 ++ post/lib_ppc/fpu

[U-Boot] [PATCH] katmai: change default config

2008-11-14 Thread Yuri Tikhonov
to read the corresponding value from the environment). The same is truth for the boot_jump_linux() function in lib_ppc/bootm.c, where U-Boot transfers control to Linux passing the CONFIG_SYS_BOOTMAPSZ (not bootm_size) value to the booting kernel. Signed-off-by: Yuri Tikhonov [EMAIL PROTECTED] Signed

[U-Boot] [PATCH] 440spe MQ initialization

2008-09-23 Thread Yuri Tikhonov
, by the ppc440spe ADMA driver, which is wrong because modifying the MQ configuration registers after normal operation has begun is not supported and could have unpredictable results. Signed-off-by: Yuri Tikhonov [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- cpu/ppc4xx/44x_spd_ddr2.c | 10 ++ include/asm-ppc

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] 440spe MQ initialization

2008-09-23 Thread Yuri Tikhonov
regards, Wolfgang Denk --- On Tuesday, September 23, 2008 you wrote: Hi Yuri, On Tuesday 23 September 2008, Yuri Tikhonov wrote: Set the MQ Read Passing MCIF Cycle limits to the recommended by AMCC values. This fixes the occasional 440SPe hard locking issues when the 440SPe's dedicated DMA

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] 440spe MQ initialization

2008-09-23 Thread Yuri Tikhonov
(DCRN_PLB1_ACR, mask); Is it OK, or should we remove these strings from the Linux driver, assuming U-Boot has already done this ? Thanks in advance, Yuri From: Stefan Roese [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tue 9/23/2008 2:43 AM To: Yuri Tikhonov Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de; Prodyut Hazarika

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] 440spe MQ initialization

2008-09-23 Thread Yuri Tikhonov
/23/2008 2:43 AM To: Yuri Tikhonov Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de; Prodyut Hazarika; Olga Buchonina Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] 440spe MQ initialization On Tuesday 23 September 2008, Yuri Tikhonov wrote: BTW, when I said recommended by AMCC in the patch description I referred to the following