Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ARM: HYP/non-sec: relocation before enable secondary cores

2015-03-27 Thread Albert ARIBAUD
Hello Tom, On Fri, 13 Feb 2015 13:09:33 -0500, Tom Rini wrote: > On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 09:37:23AM +0800, Peng Fan wrote: > > Hi, Albert and Tom > > > > On 2/4/2015 7:02 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote: > > >On 04/02/15 10:15, Peng Fan wrote: > > >>If CONFIG_ARMV7_PSCI is not defined and CONFIG_ARMV7_SE

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ARM: HYP/non-sec: relocation before enable secondary cores

2015-02-13 Thread Tom Rini
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 09:37:23AM +0800, Peng Fan wrote: > Hi, Albert and Tom > > On 2/4/2015 7:02 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote: > >On 04/02/15 10:15, Peng Fan wrote: > >>If CONFIG_ARMV7_PSCI is not defined and CONFIG_ARMV7_SECURE_BASE is defined, > >>smp_kicl_all_cpus may enable secondary cores and ru

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ARM: HYP/non-sec: relocation before enable secondary cores

2015-02-12 Thread Peng Fan
Hi, Albert and Tom On 2/4/2015 7:02 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote: On 04/02/15 10:15, Peng Fan wrote: If CONFIG_ARMV7_PSCI is not defined and CONFIG_ARMV7_SECURE_BASE is defined, smp_kicl_all_cpus may enable secondary cores and runs into secure_ram_addr( _smp_pen), before code is relocated to secure r

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ARM: HYP/non-sec: relocation before enable secondary cores

2015-02-04 Thread Marc Zyngier
On 04/02/15 10:15, Peng Fan wrote: > If CONFIG_ARMV7_PSCI is not defined and CONFIG_ARMV7_SECURE_BASE is defined, > smp_kicl_all_cpus may enable secondary cores and runs into secure_ram_addr( > _smp_pen), before code is relocated to secure ram. > So need relocation to secure ram before enable secon

[U-Boot] [PATCH] ARM: HYP/non-sec: relocation before enable secondary cores

2015-02-04 Thread Peng Fan
If CONFIG_ARMV7_PSCI is not defined and CONFIG_ARMV7_SECURE_BASE is defined, smp_kicl_all_cpus may enable secondary cores and runs into secure_ram_addr( _smp_pen), before code is relocated to secure ram. So need relocation to secure ram before enable secondary cores. Signed-off-by: Peng Fan ---