On 14/02/2017 19:52, Tom Rini wrote:
On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 02:16:13PM +0100, Jean-Jacques Hiblot wrote:
Hi Tom,
Have you had a chance to look at the patch below?
It looks fine but was too close to the release window (given the
potential impact) to merge. Thanks!
Hi Tom,
Don't want to
On 14/02/2017 19:52, Tom Rini wrote:
On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 02:16:13PM +0100, Jean-Jacques Hiblot wrote:
Hi Tom,
Have you had a chance to look at the patch below?
It looks fine but was too close to the release window (given the
potential impact) to merge. Thanks!
Ok Thank you for the
On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 02:16:13PM +0100, Jean-Jacques Hiblot wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> Have you had a chance to look at the patch below?
It looks fine but was too close to the release window (given the
potential impact) to merge. Thanks!
>
> Jean-Jacques
>
>
> On 01/02/2017 11:26, Jean-Jacques
Hi Tom,
Have you had a chance to look at the patch below?
Jean-Jacques
On 01/02/2017 11:26, Jean-Jacques Hiblot wrote:
SPL has been restricted to use only dev 0 based on the assumption that only
one MMC device is registered. This is not always the case and many
platforms now register several
SPL has been restricted to use only dev 0 based on the assumption that only
one MMC device is registered. This is not always the case and many
platforms now register several devices as expected by the spl mmc boot code
For those platform SPL_ENV_SUPPORT is broken if dev is forced to 0.
A word of
5 matches
Mail list logo