Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 06/16] Blackfin: Bf609-ezkit: implement soft switch

2012-08-22 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Monday 20 August 2012 04:11:17 Bob Liu wrote: On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 12:59 PM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote: start with the address that the newest boards are using, and then fallback to the older ones. this way there's no runtime penalty on newer boards, but older ones

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 06/16] Blackfin: Bf609-ezkit: implement soft switch

2012-08-20 Thread Bob Liu
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 12:59 PM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote: On Tuesday 07 August 2012 04:07:45 Bob Liu wrote: --- a/board/bf609-ezkit/Makefile +++ b/board/bf609-ezkit/Makefile +COBJS-$(CONFIG_BFIN_SOFT_SWITCH) += soft_switch.o is there any reason we *wouldn't* want to build

[U-Boot] [PATCH 06/16] Blackfin: Bf609-ezkit: implement soft switch

2012-08-07 Thread Bob Liu
From: Sonic Zhang sonic.zh...@analog.com Set up soft switch pins properly in board init code. Signed-off-by: Sonic Zhang sonic.zh...@analog.com Signed-off-by: Bob Liu lliu...@gmail.com --- board/bf609-ezkit/Makefile |1 + board/bf609-ezkit/bf609-ezkit.c | 22 +++--

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 06/16] Blackfin: Bf609-ezkit: implement soft switch

2012-08-07 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Tuesday 07 August 2012 04:07:45 Bob Liu wrote: --- a/board/bf609-ezkit/Makefile +++ b/board/bf609-ezkit/Makefile +COBJS-$(CONFIG_BFIN_SOFT_SWITCH) += soft_switch.o is there any reason we *wouldn't* want to build this ? i would just skip making this an option and always enable it.