Hi Jonas / Simon,
I have submitted a patch based on Jonas's suggestion.
Apologies, I am new to email based patch management and it went as new
thread (at least for me)
It's here -
https://lore.kernel.org/u-boot/20231114203309.852289-...@shantur.com/
Kind regards,
Shantur
On Mon, Nov 13, 2023
Hey Jonas,
This sounds like a good idea.
Please implement this.
Kind regards,
Shantur
On Sun, Nov 12, 2023 at 3:01 PM Jonas Karlman wrote:
>
> Hi Shantur,
>
> On 2023-11-12 15:21, Shantur Rathore wrote:
> > Hey Jonas,
> >
> >> For normal generic use the full bootstd commands should not be
Hi Jonas,
On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 at 07:53, Jonas Karlman wrote:
>
> Hi Simon,
>
> On 2023-11-12 15:22, Simon Glass wrote:
> > Hi Jonas,
> >
> > On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 at 05:50, Jonas Karlman wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Shantur,
> >>
> >> On 2023-11-12 13:34, Shantur Rathore wrote:
> >>> Hi Jonas,
> >>>
>
Hi Shantur,
On 2023-11-12 15:21, Shantur Rathore wrote:
> Hey Jonas,
>
>> For normal generic use the full bootstd commands should not be needed,
>> do you have special scripting requirements that require access to full
>> bootstd commands?
>>
>> All rockchip boards use standard boot, this only
Hi Simon,
On 2023-11-12 15:22, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Jonas,
>
> On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 at 05:50, Jonas Karlman wrote:
>>
>> Hi Shantur,
>>
>> On 2023-11-12 13:34, Shantur Rathore wrote:
>>> Hi Jonas,
>>>
The CMD_SPI is not used to interact with the SPI flash.
CMD_SF is already
Hi Jonas,
On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 at 05:50, Jonas Karlman wrote:
>
> Hi Shantur,
>
> On 2023-11-12 13:34, Shantur Rathore wrote:
> > Hi Jonas,
> >
> >> The CMD_SPI is not used to interact with the SPI flash.
> >>
> >> CMD_SF is already enabled and you can use "sf probe" and any other sf
> >> related
Hey Jonas,
> For normal generic use the full bootstd commands should not be needed,
> do you have special scripting requirements that require access to full
> bootstd commands?
>
> All rockchip boards use standard boot, this only enables full commands
> for one particular board, why is this board
Hi Shantur,
On 2023-11-12 13:34, Shantur Rathore wrote:
> Hi Jonas,
>
>> The CMD_SPI is not used to interact with the SPI flash.
>>
>> CMD_SF is already enabled and you can use "sf probe" and any other sf
>> related action to interact with the SPI flash on this board.
>>
>
> You are right, this
Hi Jonas,
> The CMD_SPI is not used to interact with the SPI flash.
>
> CMD_SF is already enabled and you can use "sf probe" and any other sf
> related action to interact with the SPI flash on this board.
>
You are right, this is not needed, thanks for correcting me.
I will update my patch.
>
On 2023-11-11 01:13, Shantur Rathore wrote:
> RockPro64 has a 16MB onboard SPI chip and current u-boot takes
> around 2MB, we can enable more features.
> Updating config to enable SPI commands and full BootSTD support.
> ---
> configs/rockpro64-rk3399_defconfig | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2
Hi Shantur,
On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 at 17:14, Shantur Rathore wrote:
>
> RockPro64 has a 16MB onboard SPI chip and current u-boot takes
> around 2MB, we can enable more features.
What takes 2MB? I have never seen U-Boot get close to that large!
Regards,
Simon
> Updating config to enable SPI
RockPro64 has a 16MB onboard SPI chip and current u-boot takes
around 2MB, we can enable more features.
Updating config to enable SPI commands and full BootSTD support.
---
configs/rockpro64-rk3399_defconfig | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/configs/rockpro64-rk3399_defconfig
12 matches
Mail list logo
