On 07/05/2020 15.03, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 08:39:42AM +, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
>
>> Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes
>> Reviewed-by: Tom Rini
>
> [I had asked for a follow-up cleanup, but this is still worth taking,
> so...]
Yeah, sorry, been rather busy, dunno when
On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 08:39:42AM +, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> CMD_EEPROM and ENV_IS_IN_EEPROM can be selected independently, and
> cmd/eeprom.o gets built in either case, so whether to declare the real
> prototypes needs to follow the same logic as whether cmd/eeprom.c is
> built. Otherwise
On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 08:39:42AM +, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> CMD_EEPROM and ENV_IS_IN_EEPROM can be selected independently, and
> cmd/eeprom.o gets built in either case, so whether to declare the real
> prototypes needs to follow the same logic as whether cmd/eeprom.c is
> built. Otherwise
CMD_EEPROM and ENV_IS_IN_EEPROM can be selected independently, and
cmd/eeprom.o gets built in either case, so whether to declare the real
prototypes needs to follow the same logic as whether cmd/eeprom.c is
built. Otherwise a ENV_IS_IN_EEPROM=y, CMD_EEPROM=n build fails
cmd/eeprom.c:73:1: error:
4 matches
Mail list logo