Re: [PATCH] riscv: binman: fix the load field format

Hi Randolph, On Mon, 13 Nov 2023 at 23:26, Randolph Lin wrote: > > Hi Simon, > Thanks a lot. > On Fri, Nov 10, 2023 at 04:50:24AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote: > > Hi Randolph, > > > > On Wed, Nov 8, 2023, 20:15 Randolph wrote: > > > > > > The #address-cells is now equal to 2. The format of the

Re: [PATCH] riscv: binman: fix the load field format

Hi Simon, Thanks a lot. On Fri, Nov 10, 2023 at 04:50:24AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Randolph, > > On Wed, Nov 8, 2023, 20:15 Randolph wrote: > > > > The #address-cells is now equal to 2. The format of the load field for > > the Linux kernel doesn't match. > > > > Signed-off-by: Randolph >

Re: [PATCH] riscv: binman: fix the load field format

Hi Randolph, On Wed, Nov 8, 2023, 20:15 Randolph wrote: > > The #address-cells is now equal to 2. The format of the load field for > the Linux kernel doesn't match. > > Signed-off-by: Randolph > --- > arch/riscv/dts/binman.dtsi | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff

[PATCH] riscv: binman: fix the load field format

The #address-cells is now equal to 2. The format of the load field for the Linux kernel doesn't match. Signed-off-by: Randolph --- arch/riscv/dts/binman.dtsi | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/riscv/dts/binman.dtsi b/arch/riscv/dts/binman.dtsi index