Hi Heinrich,
On Thu, 4 Aug 2022 at 00:06, Heinrich Schuchardt
wrote:
>
>
>
> On 8/3/22 20:14, Simon Glass wrote:
> > Hi Heinrich,
> >
> > On Tue, 2 Aug 2022 at 10:22, Heinrich Schuchardt
> > wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 8/2/22 14:41, Simon Glass wrote:
> >>> Hi Heinrich,
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, 2
On 8/3/22 20:14, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Heinrich,
On Tue, 2 Aug 2022 at 10:22, Heinrich Schuchardt
wrote:
On 8/2/22 14:41, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Heinrich,
On Tue, 2 Aug 2022 at 03:50, Heinrich Schuchardt
wrote:
Both the 'host' and the 'efiloader' block devices use the same parent
Hi Heinrich,
On Tue, 2 Aug 2022 at 10:22, Heinrich Schuchardt
wrote:
>
>
>
> On 8/2/22 14:41, Simon Glass wrote:
> > Hi Heinrich,
> >
> > On Tue, 2 Aug 2022 at 03:50, Heinrich Schuchardt
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Both the 'host' and the 'efiloader' block devices use the same parent
> >> uclass root.
On 8/2/22 14:41, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Heinrich,
On Tue, 2 Aug 2022 at 03:50, Heinrich Schuchardt
wrote:
Both the 'host' and the 'efiloader' block devices use the same parent
uclass root. Thus the parent uclass is not an indicator the interface type.
Currently the following fails:
Hi Heinrich,
On Tue, 2 Aug 2022 at 03:50, Heinrich Schuchardt
wrote:
>
> Both the 'host' and the 'efiloader' block devices use the same parent
> uclass root. Thus the parent uclass is not an indicator the interface type.
>
> Currently the following fails:
>
> setenv efi_selftest block device
Both the 'host' and the 'efiloader' block devices use the same parent
uclass root. Thus the parent uclass is not an indicator the interface type.
Currently the following fails:
setenv efi_selftest block device
bootefi selftest
part list efiloader 0
Struct blk_desc contains the
6 matches
Mail list logo