Re: [PATCH 2/3] sunxi: mmc: group non-DM specific functions

2023-01-08 Thread Samuel Holland
On 7/13/22 11:21, Andre Przywara wrote:
> As the SPL code for sunxi boards does not use the driver model, we have
> two mmc_ops structures, one for DM, one for non-DM. The actual hardware
> access code is shared, with the respective callback functions using that
> common code.
> 
> To make this more obvious and easier to read, reorder the functions to
> group them: we first have the common code, then the non-DM bits, and
> the proper DM implementation at the end.
> Also document this structure in the comment at the beginning of the file.
> 
> No functional change intended.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara 
> ---
>  drivers/mmc/sunxi_mmc.c | 117 +---
>  1 file changed, 61 insertions(+), 56 deletions(-)

Reviewed-by: Samuel Holland 
Tested-by: Samuel Holland 



[PATCH 2/3] sunxi: mmc: group non-DM specific functions

2022-07-13 Thread Andre Przywara
As the SPL code for sunxi boards does not use the driver model, we have
two mmc_ops structures, one for DM, one for non-DM. The actual hardware
access code is shared, with the respective callback functions using that
common code.

To make this more obvious and easier to read, reorder the functions to
group them: we first have the common code, then the non-DM bits, and
the proper DM implementation at the end.
Also document this structure in the comment at the beginning of the file.

No functional change intended.

Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara 
---
 drivers/mmc/sunxi_mmc.c | 117 +---
 1 file changed, 61 insertions(+), 56 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mmc/sunxi_mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/sunxi_mmc.c
index b2f7e2d142..ad0fb4ad08 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/sunxi_mmc.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/sunxi_mmc.c
@@ -5,6 +5,12 @@
  * Aaron 
  *
  * MMC driver for allwinner sunxi platform.
+ *
+ * This driver is used by the (ARM) SPL with the legacy MMC interface, and
+ * by U-Boot proper using the full DM interface. The actual hardware access
+ * code is common, and comes first in this file.
+ * The legacy MMC interface implementation comes next, followed by the
+ * proper DM_MMC implementation at the end.
  */
 
 #include 
@@ -40,48 +46,6 @@ struct sunxi_mmc_priv {
struct mmc_config cfg;
 };
 
-#if !CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(DM_MMC)
-/* support 4 mmc hosts */
-struct sunxi_mmc_priv mmc_host[4];
-
-static int mmc_resource_init(int sdc_no)
-{
-   struct sunxi_mmc_priv *priv = _host[sdc_no];
-   struct sunxi_ccm_reg *ccm = (struct sunxi_ccm_reg *)SUNXI_CCM_BASE;
-
-   debug("init mmc %d resource\n", sdc_no);
-
-   switch (sdc_no) {
-   case 0:
-   priv->reg = (struct sunxi_mmc *)SUNXI_MMC0_BASE;
-   priv->mclkreg = >sd0_clk_cfg;
-   break;
-   case 1:
-   priv->reg = (struct sunxi_mmc *)SUNXI_MMC1_BASE;
-   priv->mclkreg = >sd1_clk_cfg;
-   break;
-#ifdef SUNXI_MMC2_BASE
-   case 2:
-   priv->reg = (struct sunxi_mmc *)SUNXI_MMC2_BASE;
-   priv->mclkreg = >sd2_clk_cfg;
-   break;
-#endif
-#ifdef SUNXI_MMC3_BASE
-   case 3:
-   priv->reg = (struct sunxi_mmc *)SUNXI_MMC3_BASE;
-   priv->mclkreg = >sd3_clk_cfg;
-   break;
-#endif
-   default:
-   printf("Wrong mmc number %d\n", sdc_no);
-   return -1;
-   }
-   priv->mmc_no = sdc_no;
-
-   return 0;
-}
-#endif
-
 /*
  * All A64 and later MMC controllers feature auto-calibration. This would
  * normally be detected via the compatible string, but we need something
@@ -269,19 +233,6 @@ static int sunxi_mmc_set_ios_common(struct sunxi_mmc_priv 
*priv,
return 0;
 }
 
-#if !CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(DM_MMC)
-static int sunxi_mmc_core_init(struct mmc *mmc)
-{
-   struct sunxi_mmc_priv *priv = mmc->priv;
-
-   /* Reset controller */
-   writel(SUNXI_MMC_GCTRL_RESET, >reg->gctrl);
-   udelay(1000);
-
-   return 0;
-}
-#endif
-
 static int mmc_trans_data_by_cpu(struct sunxi_mmc_priv *priv, struct mmc *mmc,
 struct mmc_data *data)
 {
@@ -486,7 +437,60 @@ out:
return error;
 }
 
+/* non-DM code here is used by the (ARM) SPL only */
+
 #if !CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(DM_MMC)
+/* support 4 mmc hosts */
+struct sunxi_mmc_priv mmc_host[4];
+
+static int mmc_resource_init(int sdc_no)
+{
+   struct sunxi_mmc_priv *priv = _host[sdc_no];
+   struct sunxi_ccm_reg *ccm = (struct sunxi_ccm_reg *)SUNXI_CCM_BASE;
+
+   debug("init mmc %d resource\n", sdc_no);
+
+   switch (sdc_no) {
+   case 0:
+   priv->reg = (struct sunxi_mmc *)SUNXI_MMC0_BASE;
+   priv->mclkreg = >sd0_clk_cfg;
+   break;
+   case 1:
+   priv->reg = (struct sunxi_mmc *)SUNXI_MMC1_BASE;
+   priv->mclkreg = >sd1_clk_cfg;
+   break;
+#ifdef SUNXI_MMC2_BASE
+   case 2:
+   priv->reg = (struct sunxi_mmc *)SUNXI_MMC2_BASE;
+   priv->mclkreg = >sd2_clk_cfg;
+   break;
+#endif
+#ifdef SUNXI_MMC3_BASE
+   case 3:
+   priv->reg = (struct sunxi_mmc *)SUNXI_MMC3_BASE;
+   priv->mclkreg = >sd3_clk_cfg;
+   break;
+#endif
+   default:
+   printf("Wrong mmc number %d\n", sdc_no);
+   return -1;
+   }
+   priv->mmc_no = sdc_no;
+
+   return 0;
+}
+
+static int sunxi_mmc_core_init(struct mmc *mmc)
+{
+   struct sunxi_mmc_priv *priv = mmc->priv;
+
+   /* Reset controller */
+   writel(SUNXI_MMC_GCTRL_RESET, >reg->gctrl);
+   udelay(1000);
+
+   return 0;
+}
+
 static int sunxi_mmc_set_ios_legacy(struct mmc *mmc)
 {
struct sunxi_mmc_priv *priv = mmc->priv;
@@ -562,7 +566,8 @@ struct mmc *sunxi_mmc_init(int sdc_no)
 
return mmc_create(cfg, priv);
 }
-#else
+
+#else /* CONFIG_DM_MMC code below, as used by U-Boot