On Thu, Jun 03, 2021 at 09:39:01AM -0400, Tom Rini wrote:
> Based on the comment in socfpga_soc64_common.h, the intention is for
> CONFIG_SYS_MEM_RESERVE_SECURE to be unused. However, in the code we do:
> ...
>
> and that will evaluate to true. This leads to unwanted code being
> compiled.
On Thu, Jun 03, 2021 at 05:07:17PM +0200, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> On 03/06/2021 15.39, Tom Rini wrote:
> > Based on the comment in socfpga_soc64_common.h, the intention is for
> > CONFIG_SYS_MEM_RESERVE_SECURE to be unused. However, in the code we do:
> > ...
> >
> > and that will evaluate to
On 03/06/2021 15.39, Tom Rini wrote:
> Based on the comment in socfpga_soc64_common.h, the intention is for
> CONFIG_SYS_MEM_RESERVE_SECURE to be unused. However, in the code we do:
> ...
>
> and that will evaluate to true. This leads to unwanted code being
Some cleanup made lines beginning
Based on the comment in socfpga_soc64_common.h, the intention is for
CONFIG_SYS_MEM_RESERVE_SECURE to be unused. However, in the code we do:
...
and that will evaluate to true. This leads to unwanted code being
compiled. Further, as CONFIG_SYS_MEM_RESERVE_SECURE has not been
migrated to
4 matches
Mail list logo