Re: [PATCH 3/4] socfpga64: Do not define CONFIG_SYS_MEM_RESERVE_SECURE to 0

2021-06-24 Thread Tom Rini
On Thu, Jun 03, 2021 at 09:39:01AM -0400, Tom Rini wrote: > Based on the comment in socfpga_soc64_common.h, the intention is for > CONFIG_SYS_MEM_RESERVE_SECURE to be unused. However, in the code we do: > ... > > and that will evaluate to true. This leads to unwanted code being > compiled.

Re: [PATCH 3/4] socfpga64: Do not define CONFIG_SYS_MEM_RESERVE_SECURE to 0

2021-06-03 Thread Tom Rini
On Thu, Jun 03, 2021 at 05:07:17PM +0200, Rasmus Villemoes wrote: > On 03/06/2021 15.39, Tom Rini wrote: > > Based on the comment in socfpga_soc64_common.h, the intention is for > > CONFIG_SYS_MEM_RESERVE_SECURE to be unused. However, in the code we do: > > ... > > > > and that will evaluate to

Re: [PATCH 3/4] socfpga64: Do not define CONFIG_SYS_MEM_RESERVE_SECURE to 0

2021-06-03 Thread Rasmus Villemoes
On 03/06/2021 15.39, Tom Rini wrote: > Based on the comment in socfpga_soc64_common.h, the intention is for > CONFIG_SYS_MEM_RESERVE_SECURE to be unused. However, in the code we do: > ... > > and that will evaluate to true. This leads to unwanted code being Some cleanup made lines beginning

[PATCH 3/4] socfpga64: Do not define CONFIG_SYS_MEM_RESERVE_SECURE to 0

2021-06-03 Thread Tom Rini
Based on the comment in socfpga_soc64_common.h, the intention is for CONFIG_SYS_MEM_RESERVE_SECURE to be unused. However, in the code we do: ... and that will evaluate to true. This leads to unwanted code being compiled. Further, as CONFIG_SYS_MEM_RESERVE_SECURE has not been migrated to