On 29.10.22 00:38, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
On 28/10/2022 16.10, Stefan Roese wrote:
On 28.10.22 13:50, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
As for cyclic_uninit(), it was never really the opposite of
cyclic_init() since it didn't free the struct cyclic_drv nor set
gd->cyclic to NULL. Rename it to
On 28/10/2022 16.10, Stefan Roese wrote:
> On 28.10.22 13:50, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
>> As for cyclic_uninit(), it was never really the opposite of
>> cyclic_init() since it didn't free the struct cyclic_drv nor set
>> gd->cyclic to NULL. Rename it to cyclic_unregister_all() and use that
>> in
On 28.10.22 13:50, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
Currently, we must call cyclic_init() at some point before
cyclic_register() becomes possible. That turns out to be somewhat
awkward, especially with SPL, and has resulted in a watchdog callback
not being registered, thus causing the board to
Currently, we must call cyclic_init() at some point before
cyclic_register() becomes possible. That turns out to be somewhat
awkward, especially with SPL, and has resulted in a watchdog callback
not being registered, thus causing the board to prematurely reset.
We already rely on gd->cyclic
4 matches
Mail list logo