On 17/12/21 06:27AM, tudor.amba...@microchip.com wrote:
> On 12/16/21 8:45 PM, Pratyush Yadav wrote:
>
> >
> >> SFDP signature to determine the mode in which the flash is configured:
> >> '''
> >> try to read the SFDP signature (see 6.1) in 4-4-4 mode, if that fails
> >>
Hi Tudor,
I am not sure if you have sent a re-roll of this series. I am catching
back up on my email backlog.
On 15/11/21 05:44AM, tudor.amba...@microchip.com wrote:
> On 11/12/21 3:13 PM, Pratyush Yadav wrote:
> > EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the
> >
On 10/11/21 08:44AM, tudor.amba...@microchip.com wrote:
> On 11/9/21 9:26 PM, Pratyush Yadav wrote:
> > EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the
> > content is safe
> >
> > Hi Tudor,
>
> Hi, Pratyush,
>
> Thanks for reviewing the series.
>
> >
> > On
Hi Tudor,
On 04/11/21 01:49AM, Tudor Ambarus wrote:
> This reverts commit 0be8ab1f166844d53477387dc9a1184161ef44ef.
>
> There are multiple reset commands and it was used one at guess,
Correct.
> see BFPT[dword(16)]. It is preferable to avoid issuing unsupported
> commands to a flash. Since
4 matches
Mail list logo
