On Wed, 17 Jan 2024 00:19:05 +
Andre Przywara wrote:
Hi,
> On Fri, 8 Dec 2023 01:39:45 +
> Andre Przywara wrote:
>
> Hi Samuel,
>
> > On Tue, 31 Oct 2023 00:17:41 -0500
> > Samuel Holland wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > > Now that 32-bit SoCs can load U-Boot proper (and possibly
On Fri, 8 Dec 2023 01:39:45 +
Andre Przywara wrote:
Hi Samuel,
> On Tue, 31 Oct 2023 00:17:41 -0500
> Samuel Holland wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > Now that 32-bit SoCs can load U-Boot proper (and possibly other
> > firmware) from a FIT, use this method by default. SPL_FIT_IMAGE_TINY is
> >
On Tue, 31 Oct 2023 00:17:41 -0500
Samuel Holland wrote:
Hi,
> Now that 32-bit SoCs can load U-Boot proper (and possibly other
> firmware) from a FIT, use this method by default. SPL_FIT_IMAGE_TINY is
> required to stay within the 24 or 32 KiB SPL size limit on early SoCs;
> for consistency,
On Tue, 31 Oct 2023 at 05:18, Samuel Holland wrote:
>
> Now that 32-bit SoCs can load U-Boot proper (and possibly other
> firmware) from a FIT, use this method by default. SPL_FIT_IMAGE_TINY is
> required to stay within the 24 or 32 KiB SPL size limit on early SoCs;
> for consistency, enable it
Now that 32-bit SoCs can load U-Boot proper (and possibly other
firmware) from a FIT, use this method by default. SPL_FIT_IMAGE_TINY is
required to stay within the 24 or 32 KiB SPL size limit on early SoCs;
for consistency, enable it everywhere.
Signed-off-by: Samuel Holland
---
(no changes
5 matches
Mail list logo