On Sun, Dec 29, 2019 at 08:11:10PM +0100, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> On 12/29/19 7:39 PM, Cristian Ciocaltea wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 29, 2019 at 11:22:08AM +0100, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> > > On 12/24/19 5:05 PM, Cristian Ciocaltea wrote:
> > > > This test verifies the implementation of the
On 12/29/19 7:39 PM, Cristian Ciocaltea wrote:
On Sun, Dec 29, 2019 at 11:22:08AM +0100, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
On 12/24/19 5:05 PM, Cristian Ciocaltea wrote:
This test verifies the implementation of the 'bootm' extension that
handles UEFI binaries inside FIT images (enabled via
On Sun, Dec 29, 2019 at 11:22:08AM +0100, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> On 12/24/19 5:05 PM, Cristian Ciocaltea wrote:
> > This test verifies the implementation of the 'bootm' extension that
> > handles UEFI binaries inside FIT images (enabled via CONFIG_BOOTM_EFI).
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Cristian
On 12/29/19 11:22 AM, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
On 12/24/19 5:05 PM, Cristian Ciocaltea wrote:
This test verifies the implementation of the 'bootm' extension that
handles UEFI binaries inside FIT images (enabled via CONFIG_BOOTM_EFI).
Signed-off-by: Cristian Ciocaltea
Thanks a lot for
On 12/24/19 5:05 PM, Cristian Ciocaltea wrote:
This test verifies the implementation of the 'bootm' extension that
handles UEFI binaries inside FIT images (enabled via CONFIG_BOOTM_EFI).
Signed-off-by: Cristian Ciocaltea
Thanks a lot for devising this test.
---
You are using variable
This test verifies the implementation of the 'bootm' extension that
handles UEFI binaries inside FIT images (enabled via CONFIG_BOOTM_EFI).
Signed-off-by: Cristian Ciocaltea
---
test/py/tests/test_efi_fit.py | 459 ++
1 file changed, 459 insertions(+)
create
6 matches
Mail list logo