Re: [U-Boot] [FAT/EXT4/SANDBOX] files > 2GB

2014-10-09 Thread Suriyan Ramasami
Hello Simon, On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 11:16 PM, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi, > > On 8 October 2014 07:07, Suriyan Ramasami wrote: >> Hello, >>I recently saw a post about fat commands such as fatls returning >> -ve values under u-boot for files whose sizes are >=2GB. fatsize would >> also not set

Re: [U-Boot] [FAT/EXT4/SANDBOX] files > 2GB

2014-10-08 Thread Simon Glass
Hi, On 8 October 2014 07:07, Suriyan Ramasami wrote: > Hello, >I recently saw a post about fat commands such as fatls returning > -ve values under u-boot for files whose sizes are >=2GB. fatsize would > also not set up filesize in this case. > >This also effects ext4/sandbox commands. I j

[U-Boot] [FAT/EXT4/SANDBOX] files > 2GB

2014-10-08 Thread Suriyan Ramasami
Hello, I recently saw a post about fat commands such as fatls returning -ve values under u-boot for files whose sizes are >=2GB. fatsize would also not set up filesize in this case. This also effects ext4/sandbox commands. I just looked at the ones which are handled by fs/fs.c I am thin