On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 10:08:10PM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> > > How about systab.tables assigned in efi_initialize_system_table()? Which
> > > of the addresses in systab.tables should be updated upon relocation.
> > >
> > > The EFI Spec is really hazy: "A pointer to the table
On 4/12/19 7:36 PM, Ilias Apalodimas wrote:
Hi Heinrich,
Hello Ilias, hello Ard,
please, have a look at this patch:
efi_loader: update virtual address in efi_mem_carve_out
https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2019-April/364937.html
Possibly the bug reported here could have contributed
On Fri, 12 Apr 2019 at 10:44, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
>
> On 4/12/19 7:24 PM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > On Fri, 12 Apr 2019 at 10:16, Heinrich Schuchardt
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On 4/11/19 10:50 PM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> >>> On Thu, 11 Apr 2019 at 12:59, Heinrich Schuchardt
> >>> wrote:
>
Hi Heinrich,
>
> Hello Ilias, hello Ard,
>
> please, have a look at this patch:
>
> efi_loader: update virtual address in efi_mem_carve_out
> https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2019-April/364937.html
>
> Possibly the bug reported here could have contributed the Linux crash
> you
On 4/12/19 7:24 PM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On Fri, 12 Apr 2019 at 10:16, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
On 4/11/19 10:50 PM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On Thu, 11 Apr 2019 at 12:59, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
On 4/11/19 9:41 PM, Ilias Apalodimas wrote:
Hi Heinrich,
On 4/11/19 8:39 PM, Ilias
On Fri, 12 Apr 2019 at 10:16, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
>
> On 4/11/19 10:50 PM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > On Thu, 11 Apr 2019 at 12:59, Heinrich Schuchardt
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On 4/11/19 9:41 PM, Ilias Apalodimas wrote:
> >>> Hi Heinrich,
> On 4/11/19 8:39 PM, Ilias Apalodimas wrote:
>
On 4/11/19 10:50 PM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On Thu, 11 Apr 2019 at 12:59, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
On 4/11/19 9:41 PM, Ilias Apalodimas wrote:
Hi Heinrich,
On 4/11/19 8:39 PM, Ilias Apalodimas wrote:
Following Ard's suggestion:
Runtime data sections are intended for data that is used by
On Thu, 11 Apr 2019 at 12:59, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
>
> On 4/11/19 9:41 PM, Ilias Apalodimas wrote:
> > Hi Heinrich,
> >> On 4/11/19 8:39 PM, Ilias Apalodimas wrote:
> >>> Following Ard's suggestion:
> >>> Runtime data sections are intended for data that is used by the runtime
> >>> services
On Thu, 11 Apr 2019 at 13:08, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
>
> On 4/11/19 9:50 PM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > (+ Leif)
> >
> > On Thu, 11 Apr 2019 at 12:34, Heinrich Schuchardt
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On 4/11/19 8:39 PM, Ilias Apalodimas wrote:
> >>> Following Ard's suggestion:
> >>> Runtime data
On 4/11/19 9:50 PM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
(+ Leif)
On Thu, 11 Apr 2019 at 12:34, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
On 4/11/19 8:39 PM, Ilias Apalodimas wrote:
Following Ard's suggestion:
Runtime data sections are intended for data that is used by the runtime
services implementations.
Let's change
On 4/11/19 9:41 PM, Ilias Apalodimas wrote:
Hi Heinrich,
On 4/11/19 8:39 PM, Ilias Apalodimas wrote:
Following Ard's suggestion:
Runtime data sections are intended for data that is used by the runtime
services implementations.
Let's change they type to EFI_ACPI_RECLAIM_MEMORY
Suggested-by:
(+ Leif)
On Thu, 11 Apr 2019 at 12:34, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
>
> On 4/11/19 8:39 PM, Ilias Apalodimas wrote:
> > Following Ard's suggestion:
> > Runtime data sections are intended for data that is used by the runtime
> > services implementations.
> > Let's change they type to
Hi Heinrich,
> On 4/11/19 8:39 PM, Ilias Apalodimas wrote:
> >Following Ard's suggestion:
> >Runtime data sections are intended for data that is used by the runtime
> >services implementations.
> >Let's change they type to EFI_ACPI_RECLAIM_MEMORY
> >
> >Suggested-by: Ard Biesheuvel
>
On 4/11/19 8:39 PM, Ilias Apalodimas wrote:
Following Ard's suggestion:
Runtime data sections are intended for data that is used by the runtime
services implementations.
Let's change they type to EFI_ACPI_RECLAIM_MEMORY
Suggested-by: Ard Biesheuvel
Signed-off-by: Ilias Apalodimas
---
Hi Ard,
> On Thu, 11 Apr 2019 at 11:39, Ilias Apalodimas
> wrote:
> >
> > Following Ard's suggestion:
> > Runtime data sections are intended for data that is used by the runtime
> > services implementations.
> > Let's change they type to EFI_ACPI_RECLAIM_MEMORY
> >
> > Suggested-by: Ard
On Thu, 11 Apr 2019 at 11:39, Ilias Apalodimas
wrote:
>
> Following Ard's suggestion:
> Runtime data sections are intended for data that is used by the runtime
> services implementations.
> Let's change they type to EFI_ACPI_RECLAIM_MEMORY
>
> Suggested-by: Ard Biesheuvel
> Signed-off-by: Ilias
Following Ard's suggestion:
Runtime data sections are intended for data that is used by the runtime
services implementations.
Let's change they type to EFI_ACPI_RECLAIM_MEMORY
Suggested-by: Ard Biesheuvel
Signed-off-by: Ilias Apalodimas
---
cmd/bootefi.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2
17 matches
Mail list logo
