Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] 440spe MQ initialization

2008-10-17 Thread Stefan Roese
Hi Wolfgang, On Friday 17 October 2008, Wolfgang Denk wrote: Set the MQ Read Passing MCIF Cycle limits to the recommended by AMCC values. This fixes the occasional 440SPe hard locking issues when the 440SPe's dedicated DMA engines are used (e.g. by the h/w accelerated RAID driver).

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] 440spe MQ initialization

2008-10-17 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Stefan Roese, In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote: So it seems that the current code relies on some already preset (default) values in those registers. I don't really like this. I'll try to provide a patch that configures those registers completely in a short while. In a short

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] 440spe MQ initialization

2008-09-25 Thread Stefan Roese
On Tuesday 23 September 2008, Yuri Tikhonov wrote: Is it OK, or should we remove these strings from the Linux driver, assuming U-Boot has already done this ? Please go ahead and remove these from the linux driver. Thanks for confirmation, will do. I have to admit that I am a little

[U-Boot] [PATCH] 440spe MQ initialization

2008-09-23 Thread Yuri Tikhonov
Set the MQ Read Passing MCIF Cycle limits to the recommended by AMCC values. This fixes the occasional 440SPe hard locking issues when the 440SPe's dedicated DMA engines are used (e.g. by the h/w accelerated RAID driver). Previously the appropriate initialization had been made in Linux, by

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] 440spe MQ initialization

2008-09-23 Thread Stefan Roese
Hi Yuri, On Tuesday 23 September 2008, Yuri Tikhonov wrote: Set the MQ Read Passing MCIF Cycle limits to the recommended by AMCC values. This fixes the occasional 440SPe hard locking issues when the 440SPe's dedicated DMA engines are used (e.g. by the h/w accelerated RAID driver).

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] 440spe MQ initialization

2008-09-23 Thread Stefan Roese
On Tuesday 23 September 2008, Yuri Tikhonov wrote: BTW, when I said recommended by AMCC in the patch description I referred to the following information forwarded to me by Wolfgang Denk on Tue Mar 18 2008: --- Dear Yuri, here is some additional (and hopefully helpful) information from

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] 440spe MQ initialization

2008-09-23 Thread Yuri Tikhonov
Hello, BTW, when I said recommended by AMCC in the patch description I referred to the following information forwarded to me by Wolfgang Denk on Tue Mar 18 2008: --- Dear Yuri, here is some additional (and hopefully helpful) information from AMCC regarding the observed hangs on the katmai

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] 440spe MQ initialization

2008-09-23 Thread Olga Buchonina
Hazarika; Olga Buchonina Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] 440spe MQ initialization On Tuesday 23 September 2008, Yuri Tikhonov wrote: BTW, when I said recommended by AMCC in the patch description I referred to the following information forwarded to me by Wolfgang Denk on Tue Mar 18 2008

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] 440spe MQ initialization

2008-09-23 Thread Prodyut Hazarika
in the program_memory_queue function. Thanks, Prodyut From: Stefan Roese [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tue 9/23/2008 2:43 AM To: Yuri Tikhonov Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de; Prodyut Hazarika; Olga Buchonina Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] 440spe MQ initialization

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] 440spe MQ initialization

2008-09-23 Thread Yuri Tikhonov
; Olga Buchonina Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] 440spe MQ initialization On Tuesday 23 September 2008, Yuri Tikhonov wrote: BTW, when I said recommended by AMCC in the patch description I referred to the following information forwarded to me by Wolfgang Denk on Tue Mar 18 2008: --- Dear Yuri

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] 440spe MQ initialization

2008-09-23 Thread Yuri Tikhonov
/23/2008 2:43 AM To: Yuri Tikhonov Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de; Prodyut Hazarika; Olga Buchonina Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] 440spe MQ initialization On Tuesday 23 September 2008, Yuri Tikhonov wrote: BTW, when I said recommended by AMCC in the patch description I referred to the following