On 11:40 Mon 20 Jul , Minkyu Kang wrote:
Because of the reset_cpu is soc specific, should be move to soc
Cc: Dirk Behme dirk.be...@googlemail.com
Signed-off-by: Minkyu Kang mk7.k...@samsung.com
---
cpu/arm_cortexa8/omap3/Makefile |1 +
cpu/arm_cortexa8/omap3/reset.S | 36
Minkyu Kang wrote:
Because of the reset_cpu is soc specific, should be move to soc
Thanks, looks fine for me.
For the archives, this makes
http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-May/053490.html
obsolete.
Dirk
Cc: Dirk Behme dirk.be...@googlemail.com
Signed-off-by: Minkyu Kang
Because of the reset_cpu is soc specific, should be move to soc
Cc: Dirk Behme dirk.be...@googlemail.com
Signed-off-by: Minkyu Kang mk7.k...@samsung.com
---
cpu/arm_cortexa8/omap3/Makefile |1 +
cpu/arm_cortexa8/omap3/reset.S | 36
Hi,
It's already discussed. Actually it's required for adding new S5PC1xx
series based on arm cortext8.
Please apply it.
Thank you,
Kyungmin Park
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 11:40 AM, Minkyu Kangmk7.k...@samsung.com wrote:
Because of the reset_cpu is soc specific, should be move to soc
Cc: Dirk
Minkyu Kang wrote:
Dear Jean and Dirk,
cpu/arm_cortexa8/omap3/lowlevel_init.S | 12
cpu/arm_cortexa8/start.S | 14 --
2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
Index: u-boot-arm/cpu/arm_cortexa8/omap3/lowlevel_init.S
Dear Jean and Dirk,
cpu/arm_cortexa8/omap3/lowlevel_init.S | 12
cpu/arm_cortexa8/start.S | 14 --
2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
Index: u-boot-arm/cpu/arm_cortexa8/omap3/lowlevel_init.S
Dear Jean-Christophe,
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
On 17:56 Sun 31 May , Dirk Behme wrote:
Dear Jean-Christophe,
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
On 09:30 Sat 30 May , Dirk Behme wrote:
Reset is SoC specific and not ARM Cortex A8 generic. Move it from generic
code
Dear Jean Dirk,
Jean's opinion seems that file naming func naming must match
for soruce maintaining, definitely I agree with that.
Moreover it's a very first time to implement the new arm_cortexa8
code for u-boot source. So, the matching works is needed.
On the other hand, Dirk's opinion
Dear Riverful,
In message b64afca20906010014r321bd3fas3539d97f6667e...@mail.gmail.com you
wrote:
Jean's opinion seems that file naming func naming must match
for soruce maintaining, definitely I agree with that.
I do not agree.
Yes, they _should_ match. That means we should try to
On 17:56 Sun 31 May , Dirk Behme wrote:
Dear Jean-Christophe,
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
On 09:30 Sat 30 May , Dirk Behme wrote:
Reset is SoC specific and not ARM Cortex A8 generic. Move it from generic
code to OMAP3 SoC specific file.
CC: Kim, Heung Jun
On 09:30 Sat 30 May , Dirk Behme wrote:
Reset is SoC specific and not ARM Cortex A8 generic. Move it from generic
code to OMAP3 SoC specific file.
CC: Kim, Heung Jun river...@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Dirk Behme dirk.be...@googlemail.com
---
This patches fixes the second issue found
Reset is SoC specific and not ARM Cortex A8 generic. Move it from generic
code to OMAP3 SoC specific file.
CC: Kim, Heung Jun river...@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Dirk Behme dirk.be...@googlemail.com
---
This patches fixes the second issue found by riverful in
12 matches
Mail list logo