On 11/11/19 7:06 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
On Wed, Nov 06, 2019 at 05:22:44PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
A recent change adjusted the symbol calculation to work on x86 but broke
it for Tegra. In fact this is because they have different needs.
On x86 devices the code is linked to a ROM address and
On Wed, Nov 06, 2019 at 05:22:44PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> A recent change adjusted the symbol calculation to work on x86 but broke
> it for Tegra. In fact this is because they have different needs.
>
> On x86 devices the code is linked to a ROM address and the end-at-4gb
> property is used
On 11/7/19 9:25 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 11/6/19 5:22 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
A recent change adjusted the symbol calculation to work on x86 but broke
it for Tegra. In fact this is because they have different needs.
On x86 devices the code is linked to a ROM address and the end-at-4gb
On 11/6/19 5:22 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
A recent change adjusted the symbol calculation to work on x86 but broke
it for Tegra. In fact this is because they have different needs.
On x86 devices the code is linked to a ROM address and the end-at-4gb
property is used for the image. In this case
A recent change adjusted the symbol calculation to work on x86 but broke
it for Tegra. In fact this is because they have different needs.
On x86 devices the code is linked to a ROM address and the end-at-4gb
property is used for the image. In this case there is no need to add the
base address of
5 matches
Mail list logo
