Hi Michael, all,
On 26.07.2016 11:41, Kever Yang wrote:
Hi Michael,
On 07/26/2016 05:08 PM, Michael Trimarchi wrote:
Hi
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 10:59 AM, Kever Yang
wrote:
Hi Michael,
On 07/26/2016 04:37 PM, Michael Trimarchi wrote:
Hi
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 9:56 AM, Kever Yang
wrote:
Hi Michael,
On 07/26/2016 05:08 PM, Michael Trimarchi wrote:
Hi
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 10:59 AM, Kever Yang wrote:
Hi Michael,
On 07/26/2016 04:37 PM, Michael Trimarchi wrote:
Hi
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 9:56 AM, Kever Yang
wrote:
The calculation of "dev_desc->lba - 34 - 1 - offset" is
Hi
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 10:59 AM, Kever Yang wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
>
> On 07/26/2016 04:37 PM, Michael Trimarchi wrote:
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 9:56 AM, Kever Yang
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> The calculation of "dev_desc->lba - 34 - 1 - offset" is not correct for
>>> size '-', because
Hi Michael,
On 07/26/2016 04:37 PM, Michael Trimarchi wrote:
Hi
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 9:56 AM, Kever Yang wrote:
The calculation of "dev_desc->lba - 34 - 1 - offset" is not correct for
size '-', because both fist_usable_lba and last_usable_lba will remain
34 sectors.
We can simply use 0 f
Hi
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 9:56 AM, Kever Yang wrote:
> The calculation of "dev_desc->lba - 34 - 1 - offset" is not correct for
> size '-', because both fist_usable_lba and last_usable_lba will remain
> 34 sectors.
>
> We can simply use 0 for size '-' because the part_efi module will decode
> th
The calculation of "dev_desc->lba - 34 - 1 - offset" is not correct for
size '-', because both fist_usable_lba and last_usable_lba will remain
34 sectors.
We can simply use 0 for size '-' because the part_efi module will decode
the size and auto extend the size to maximum available size.
Signed-
6 matches
Mail list logo