On Wednesday 12 October 2016 11:14 AM, Keerthy wrote:
On Tuesday 11 October 2016 05:49 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Keerthy,
On 15 September 2016 at 05:16, Keerthy wrote:
On Thursday 15 September 2016 04:38 PM, Keerthy wrote:
On Thursday 15 September 2016 04:26 PM,
On Tuesday 11 October 2016 05:49 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Keerthy,
On 15 September 2016 at 05:16, Keerthy wrote:
On Thursday 15 September 2016 04:38 PM, Keerthy wrote:
On Thursday 15 September 2016 04:26 PM, Przemyslaw Marczak wrote:
Hello Keerthy,
On 09/15/2016
Hi Keerthy,
On 15 September 2016 at 05:16, Keerthy wrote:
>
>
> On Thursday 15 September 2016 04:38 PM, Keerthy wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thursday 15 September 2016 04:26 PM, Przemyslaw Marczak wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello Keerthy,
>>>
>>> On 09/15/2016 10:54 AM, Keerthy wrote:
On Thursday 15 September 2016 04:38 PM, Keerthy wrote:
On Thursday 15 September 2016 04:26 PM, Przemyslaw Marczak wrote:
Hello Keerthy,
On 09/15/2016 10:54 AM, Keerthy wrote:
Currently the specific set ops functions are directly
called without any check for voltage/current limits for a
Hello Keerthy,
On 09/15/2016 10:54 AM, Keerthy wrote:
Currently the specific set ops functions are directly
called without any check for voltage/current limits for a regulator.
Check for them and proceed.
Signed-off-by: Keerthy
---
On Thursday 15 September 2016 04:26 PM, Przemyslaw Marczak wrote:
Hello Keerthy,
On 09/15/2016 10:54 AM, Keerthy wrote:
Currently the specific set ops functions are directly
called without any check for voltage/current limits for a regulator.
Check for them and proceed.
Signed-off-by:
Currently the specific set ops functions are directly
called without any check for voltage/current limits for a regulator.
Check for them and proceed.
Signed-off-by: Keerthy
---
drivers/power/regulator/regulator-uclass.c | 10 ++
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
diff
7 matches
Mail list logo