On 25 March 2017 at 21:47, Simon Glass wrote:
> On 23 March 2017 at 21:39, Kever Yang wrote:
>> Hi Philipp,
>>
>> On 03/24/2017 06:27 AM, Philipp Tomsich wrote:
>>>
>>> The BootROM of the RK3399 SoC does not initialise the cntfrq_el0 (which
>>> holds
On 23 March 2017 at 21:39, Kever Yang wrote:
> Hi Philipp,
>
> On 03/24/2017 06:27 AM, Philipp Tomsich wrote:
>>
>> The BootROM of the RK3399 SoC does not initialise the cntfrq_el0 (which
>> holds the value 0 (zero) on entry into the SPL. This causes the timebase
>> for
Hi Philipp,
On 03/24/2017 06:27 AM, Philipp Tomsich wrote:
The BootROM of the RK3399 SoC does not initialise the cntfrq_el0 (which
holds the value 0 (zero) on entry into the SPL. This causes the timebase
for U-Boot not to advance (and will cause a hang where a timeout would
be expected... e.g.
The BootROM of the RK3399 SoC does not initialise the cntfrq_el0 (which
holds the value 0 (zero) on entry into the SPL. This causes the timebase
for U-Boot not to advance (and will cause a hang where a timeout would
be expected... e.g. if something goes wrong during MMC/SD card startup).
This
4 matches
Mail list logo