Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/2] Revert "ARM: set GD_FLG_RELOC for boards skipping relocation to RAM"

Dear Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD, In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/2] Normally, such a subject means that message No. '0' contains some explanation about the following patch series, followed by two relates patches numbered '1' and '2'. I find it pr

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/2] Revert "ARM: set GD_FLG_RELOC for boards skipping relocation to RAM"

Dear Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD, In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > This reverts commit f96b44cef897bd372beb86dde1b33637c119d84d. And what exactly is the reason to revert this patch? Please explain. Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgan

[U-Boot] [PATCH 0/2] Revert "ARM: set GD_FLG_RELOC for boards skipping relocation to RAM"

This reverts commit f96b44cef897bd372beb86dde1b33637c119d84d. diff --git a/lib_arm/board.c b/lib_arm/board.c index 5ade882..47e834c 100644 --- a/lib_arm/board.c +++ b/lib_arm/board.c @@ -220,18 +220,6 @@ static int init_func_i2c (void) } #endif -#ifdef CONFIG_SKIP_RELOCATE_UBOOT -/* - * This r