Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/7] Bootgraph.pl instrumentation support for UBoot

2011-09-13 Thread Simon Glass
Hi Graeme, On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 10:24 PM, Graeme Russ graeme.r...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Simon, On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 2:34 PM, Simon Glass s...@chromium.org wrote: Hi Andrew, On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 5:40 AM, Andrew Murray amur...@theiet.org wrote: On 1 September 2011 00:53, Andrew Murray

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/7] Bootgraph.pl instrumentation support for UBoot

2011-09-13 Thread Graeme Russ
Hi Simon, On 13/09/11 21:52, Simon Glass wrote: Hi Graeme, On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 10:24 PM, Graeme Russ graeme.r...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Simon, On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 2:34 PM, Simon Glass s...@chromium.org wrote: Hi Andrew, On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 5:40 AM, Andrew Murray

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/7] Bootgraph.pl instrumentation support for UBoot

2011-09-13 Thread Simon Glass
Hi Graeme, On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 5:01 AM, Graeme Russ graeme.r...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Simon, On 13/09/11 21:52, Simon Glass wrote: Hi Graeme, On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 10:24 PM, Graeme Russ graeme.r...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Simon, On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 2:34 PM, Simon Glass

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/7] Bootgraph.pl instrumentation support for UBoot

2011-09-12 Thread Simon Glass
Hi Andrew, On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 5:40 AM, Andrew Murray amur...@theiet.org wrote: On 1 September 2011 00:53, Andrew Murray amur...@theiet.org wrote: I will assume that we have a microsecond timer, update my patch and resubmit so you can take a look and see what you think. Hopefully we

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/7] Bootgraph.pl instrumentation support for UBoot

2011-09-12 Thread Graeme Russ
Hi Simon, On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 2:34 PM, Simon Glass s...@chromium.org wrote: Hi Andrew, On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 5:40 AM, Andrew Murray amur...@theiet.org wrote: On 1 September 2011 00:53, Andrew Murray amur...@theiet.org wrote: This patch touches on Graeme's initcall patch. If

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/7] Bootgraph.pl instrumentation support for UBoot

2011-09-10 Thread Andrew Murray
On 1 September 2011 00:53, Andrew Murray amur...@theiet.org wrote: I will assume that we have a microsecond timer, update my patch and resubmit so you can take a look and see what you think. Hopefully we can unify this, your patch and the boot_progress stuff. Excellent! OK, well I will

[U-Boot] [PATCH 0/7] Bootgraph.pl instrumentation support for UBoot

2011-08-31 Thread Andrew Murray
This patchset introduces the CONFIG_BOOT_TRACE option which provides support for boot time instrumentation. When enabled printf output is prefixed with timing information (similar to the kernel's CONFIG_PRINTK_TIME option) and additional output is generated which instruments functions and

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/7] Bootgraph.pl instrumentation support for UBoot

2011-08-31 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Wednesday, August 31, 2011 18:20:54 Andrew Murray wrote: This patchset introduces the CONFIG_BOOT_TRACE option which provides support for boot time instrumentation. When enabled printf output is prefixed with timing information (similar to the kernel's CONFIG_PRINTK_TIME option) and

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/7] Bootgraph.pl instrumentation support for UBoot

2011-08-31 Thread Simon Glass
Hi Mike, On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote: On Wednesday, August 31, 2011 18:20:54 Andrew Murray wrote: This patchset introduces the CONFIG_BOOT_TRACE option which provides support for boot time instrumentation. When enabled printf output is prefixed

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/7] Bootgraph.pl instrumentation support for UBoot

2011-08-31 Thread Andrew Murray
On 1 September 2011 00:12, Simon Glass s...@chromium.org wrote: Hi Mike, On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote: On Wednesday, August 31, 2011 18:20:54 Andrew Murray wrote: This patchset introduces the CONFIG_BOOT_TRACE option which provides support for boot

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/7] Bootgraph.pl instrumentation support for UBoot

2011-08-31 Thread Graeme Russ
Hi Andrew, On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 9:25 AM, Andrew Murray amur...@mpc-data.co.uk wrote: On 1 September 2011 00:12, Simon Glass s...@chromium.org wrote: Hi Mike, On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote: On Wednesday, August 31, 2011 18:20:54 Andrew Murray wrote:

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/7] Bootgraph.pl instrumentation support for UBoot

2011-08-31 Thread Simon Glass
Hi Andrew, On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 4:32 PM, Graeme Russ graeme.r...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Andrew, On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 9:25 AM, Andrew Murray amur...@mpc-data.co.uk wrote: On 1 September 2011 00:12, Simon Glass s...@chromium.org wrote: Hi Mike, On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Mike

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/7] Bootgraph.pl instrumentation support for UBoot

2011-08-31 Thread Andrew Murray
On 1 September 2011 00:39, Simon Glass s...@chromium.org wrote: Is there any cross over between my approach and what is planned/already been done? Don't worry - your contribution is very welcome! Yes I think there is cross-over, and perhaps the right approach is to try to merge them