On 30 June 2015 at 08:51, Simon Glass s...@chromium.org wrote:
Hi Hans,
On 30 June 2015 at 06:29, Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi,
On 29-06-15 05:44, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Hans.
On 17 June 2015 at 13:33, Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com wrote:
Drop the unneeded portnr
Hi,
On 29-06-15 05:44, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Hans.
On 17 June 2015 at 13:33, Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com wrote:
Drop the unneeded portnr function argument, the portnr is part of the
usb_device struct which is passed via the dev argument.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com
Hi Hans,
On 30 June 2015 at 06:29, Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi,
On 29-06-15 05:44, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Hans.
On 17 June 2015 at 13:33, Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com wrote:
Drop the unneeded portnr function argument, the portnr is part of the
usb_device struct
Hi Hans.
On 17 June 2015 at 13:33, Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com wrote:
Drop the unneeded portnr function argument, the portnr is part of the
usb_device struct which is passed via the dev argument.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com
---
common/usb.c | 10
Drop the unneeded portnr function argument, the portnr is part of the
usb_device struct which is passed via the dev argument.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com
---
common/usb.c | 10 +-
drivers/usb/host/usb-uclass.c | 2 +-
include/usb.h |
5 matches
Mail list logo