On Monday 20 August 2012 04:11:17 Bob Liu wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 12:59 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > start with the address that the newest boards are using, and then
> > fallback to the older ones. this way there's no runtime penalty on
> > newer boards, but older ones continue to work.
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 12:59 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Tuesday 07 August 2012 04:07:45 Bob Liu wrote:
>> --- a/board/bf609-ezkit/Makefile
>> +++ b/board/bf609-ezkit/Makefile
>>
>> +COBJS-$(CONFIG_BFIN_SOFT_SWITCH) += soft_switch.o
>
> is there any reason we *wouldn't* want to build this ?
On Tuesday 07 August 2012 04:07:45 Bob Liu wrote:
> --- a/board/bf609-ezkit/Makefile
> +++ b/board/bf609-ezkit/Makefile
>
> +COBJS-$(CONFIG_BFIN_SOFT_SWITCH) += soft_switch.o
is there any reason we *wouldn't* want to build this ? i would just skip
making this an option and always enable it.
a
From: Sonic Zhang
Set up soft switch pins properly in board init code.
Signed-off-by: Sonic Zhang
Signed-off-by: Bob Liu
---
board/bf609-ezkit/Makefile |1 +
board/bf609-ezkit/bf609-ezkit.c | 22 +++--
board/bf609-ezkit/soft_switch.c | 173 +++
4 matches
Mail list logo