Hi
On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 5:10 PM, Lothar Waßmann wrote:
> Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 4:19 PM, Lothar Waßmann
>> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > On Wed, 4 Jul 2018 15:53:36 +0200 Michael Trimarchi wrote:
>> >> We need to address the redundat image case
Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 4:19 PM, Lothar Waßmann
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Wed, 4 Jul 2018 15:53:36 +0200 Michael Trimarchi wrote:
> >> We need to address the redundat image case and undestand if the
> >> image is corrupted or not and fallback to
Hi
On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 4:19 PM, Lothar Waßmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 4 Jul 2018 15:53:36 +0200 Michael Trimarchi wrote:
>> We need to address the redundat image case and undestand if the
>> image is corrupted or not and fallback to the copy. The function
>> used before was always return 0
Hi,
On Wed, 4 Jul 2018 15:53:36 +0200 Michael Trimarchi wrote:
> We need to address the redundat image case and undestand if the
> image is corrupted or not and fallback to the copy. The function
> used before was always return 0 without any evaluation of the
> error. We try to make it work
We need to address the redundat image case and undestand if the
image is corrupted or not and fallback to the copy. The function
used before was always return 0 without any evaluation of the
error. We try to make it work properly
Change-Id: Id6fc221c5cc08934b7324dd5d319b93c56e2e678
Signed-off-by:
5 matches
Mail list logo