On 9/11/19 8:35 AM, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
Heinrich,
Apologies for having not replied.
On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 08:09:45PM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
On 8/23/19 1:34 AM, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 08:19:24PM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
On 8/22/19 10:54 AM, AKA
Heinrich,
Apologies for having not replied.
On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 08:09:45PM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> On 8/23/19 1:34 AM, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> >On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 08:19:24PM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> >>On 8/22/19 10:54 AM, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> >>>Sandbox's "hos
On 8/23/19 1:34 AM, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 08:19:24PM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
On 8/22/19 10:54 AM, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
Sandbox's "host" devices are currently described as UCLASS_ROOT udevice
with DEV_IF_HOST block device. As the current implementation of
efi
On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 08:19:24PM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> On 8/22/19 10:54 AM, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> >Sandbox's "host" devices are currently described as UCLASS_ROOT udevice
> >with DEV_IF_HOST block device. As the current implementation of
> >efi_device_path doesn't support such a
On 8/22/19 10:54 AM, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
Sandbox's "host" devices are currently described as UCLASS_ROOT udevice
with DEV_IF_HOST block device. As the current implementation of
efi_device_path doesn't support such a type, any "host" device
on sandbox cannot be seen as a distinct object.
For e
Sandbox's "host" devices are currently described as UCLASS_ROOT udevice
with DEV_IF_HOST block device. As the current implementation of
efi_device_path doesn't support such a type, any "host" device
on sandbox cannot be seen as a distinct object.
For example,
=> host bind 0 /foo/disk.img
=> e
6 matches
Mail list logo