Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/4] mx6ul_14x14_evk: Remove CONFIG_SPL_FAT_SUPPORT

2015-09-13 Thread Stefano Babic
On 09/09/2015 14:26, Fabio Estevam wrote: > Hi Peng and Stefano, > > On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 4:37 AM, Stefano Babic wrote: > #define CONFIG_SPL_LIBCOMMON_SUPPORT #define CONFIG_SPL_MMC_SUPPORT -#define CONFIG_SPL_FAT_SUPPORT >>> >>> Can we keep this? Without this, we need to burn

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/4] mx6ul_14x14_evk: Remove CONFIG_SPL_FAT_SUPPORT

2015-09-09 Thread Fabio Estevam
Hi Peng, On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 10:33 AM, Peng Fan wrote: > Fabio and Stefano, > > I agree that we have a common way for Freescale boards. But why > not choose SPL_FAT? In future we may add QSPI or SPI SPL boot, then we We have boards that boot from SPI SPL today and this is well supported. >

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/4] mx6ul_14x14_evk: Remove CONFIG_SPL_FAT_SUPPORT

2015-09-09 Thread Peng Fan
On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 03:36:38PM +0200, Stefano Babic wrote: >Hi Fabio, > >On 09/09/2015 14:26, Fabio Estevam wrote: >> Hi Peng and Stefano, >> >> On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 4:37 AM, Stefano Babic wrote: >> > #define CONFIG_SPL_LIBCOMMON_SUPPORT > #define CONFIG_SPL_MMC_SUPPORT > -#def

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/4] mx6ul_14x14_evk: Remove CONFIG_SPL_FAT_SUPPORT

2015-09-09 Thread Stefano Babic
Hi Fabio, On 09/09/2015 14:26, Fabio Estevam wrote: > Hi Peng and Stefano, > > On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 4:37 AM, Stefano Babic wrote: > #define CONFIG_SPL_LIBCOMMON_SUPPORT #define CONFIG_SPL_MMC_SUPPORT -#define CONFIG_SPL_FAT_SUPPORT >>> >>> Can we keep this? Without this, we nee

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/4] mx6ul_14x14_evk: Remove CONFIG_SPL_FAT_SUPPORT

2015-09-09 Thread Otavio Salvador
On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 9:26 AM, Fabio Estevam wrote: > On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 4:37 AM, Stefano Babic wrote: #define CONFIG_SPL_LIBCOMMON_SUPPORT #define CONFIG_SPL_MMC_SUPPORT -#define CONFIG_SPL_FAT_SUPPORT >>> >>> Can we keep this? Without this, we need to burn u-boot.img into sd

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/4] mx6ul_14x14_evk: Remove CONFIG_SPL_FAT_SUPPORT

2015-09-09 Thread Fabio Estevam
Hi Peng and Stefano, On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 4:37 AM, Stefano Babic wrote: >>> #define CONFIG_SPL_LIBCOMMON_SUPPORT >>> #define CONFIG_SPL_MMC_SUPPORT >>> -#define CONFIG_SPL_FAT_SUPPORT >> >> Can we keep this? Without this, we need to burn u-boot.img into sdcard, but >> i prefer to load u-boot.i

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/4] mx6ul_14x14_evk: Remove CONFIG_SPL_FAT_SUPPORT

2015-09-09 Thread Stefano Babic
Hi Peng, Fabio, On 09/09/2015 05:29, Peng Fan wrote: > Hi Fabio, > > On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 02:43:11PM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote: >> If the SD card does not contain the u-boot.img then we get the >> following error: >> >> U-Boot SPL 2015.10-rc2-23947-g7ad5930 (Sep 08 2015 - 14:10:29)

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/4] mx6ul_14x14_evk: Remove CONFIG_SPL_FAT_SUPPORT

2015-09-08 Thread Peng Fan
Hi Fabio, On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 02:43:11PM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote: >If the SD card does not contain the u-boot.img then we get the >following error: > >U-Boot SPL 2015.10-rc2-23947-g7ad5930 (Sep 08 2015 - 14:10:29) > >** Partition 1 not valid on device 0 **

[U-Boot] [PATCH 3/4] mx6ul_14x14_evk: Remove CONFIG_SPL_FAT_SUPPORT

2015-09-08 Thread Fabio Estevam
If the SD card does not contain the u-boot.img then we get the following error: U-Boot SPL 2015.10-rc2-23947-g7ad5930 (Sep 08 2015 - 14:10:29) ** Partition 1 not valid on device 0 ** spl_register_fat_device: fat register err - -1