Wolfgang,
On Fri, 2011-08-26 at 00:31 +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear York Sun,
In message 1314308192.29220.29.camel@oslab-l1 you wrote:
I am introducing it to this file as it is already being used somewhere
else. If you are trying to enforce this new policy, please start with
brand
Dear York Sun,
In message 1314378058.20734.25.camel@oslab-l1 you wrote:
I am going to follow the style and not to add new typedefs. For the
existing typedef, I will keep using them. In this case, it is an
existing typedef, just for another platform. Fixing it alone will cause
more troubles.
On Fri, 2011-08-26 at 20:12 +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear York Sun,
In message 1314378058.20734.25.camel@oslab-l1 you wrote:
I am going to follow the style and not to add new typedefs. For the
existing typedef, I will keep using them. In this case, it is an
existing typedef, just
Wolfgang,
On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 00:36 +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear York Sun,
In message 1312923045-2612-5-git-send-email-york...@freescale.com you wrote:
Unified DDR driver is maintained for better performance, robustness and bug
fixes. Upgrading to use unified DDR driver for MPC83xx
Dear York Sun,
In message 1314305821.29220.21.camel@oslab-l1 you wrote:
WARNING: do not add new typedefs
#408: FILE: arch/powerpc/include/asm/immap_83xx.h:289:
+typedef struct ccsr_ddr {
Please fix.
I can fix the new tyepdef. But this one isn't. It has been used for a
long time
On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 23:20 +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear York Sun,
In message 1314305821.29220.21.camel@oslab-l1 you wrote:
WARNING: do not add new typedefs
#408: FILE: arch/powerpc/include/asm/immap_83xx.h:289:
+typedef struct ccsr_ddr {
Please fix.
I can fix the
Dear York Sun,
In message 1314307500.29220.24.camel@oslab-l1 you wrote:
Fixing all existing reference to ccs_ddr is a lot of work, comparing
with defining it for 83xx. There are many other typedefs in the very
same files. Would we fix all of them? I don't think so. The bottom of
well, if you
Wolfgang,
On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 23:30 +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear York Sun,
In message 1314307500.29220.24.camel@oslab-l1 you wrote:
Fixing all existing reference to ccs_ddr is a lot of work, comparing
with defining it for 83xx. There are many other typedefs in the very
same
Dear York Sun,
In message 1314308192.29220.29.camel@oslab-l1 you wrote:
I am introducing it to this file as it is already being used somewhere
else. If you are trying to enforce this new policy, please start with
brand new files/typedefs, as you pointed out in my another patch. I will
be
Dear York Sun,
In message 1312923045-2612-5-git-send-email-york...@freescale.com you wrote:
Unified DDR driver is maintained for better performance, robustness and bug
fixes. Upgrading to use unified DDR driver for MPC83xx takes advantage of
overall improvement. It requires changes for board
Unified DDR driver is maintained for better performance, robustness and bug
fixes. Upgrading to use unified DDR driver for MPC83xx takes advantage of
overall improvement. It requires changes for board files to customize
platform-dependent parameters.
To utilize the unified DDR driver, a board
11 matches
Mail list logo
